<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Like Google? Don&#8217;t Forget Yahoo &amp; MSN&#160;Too</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.searchenginejournal.com/forget-google-seo-for-yahoo-and-msn-is-easy/8473/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/forget-google-seo-for-yahoo-and-msn-is-easy/8473/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 17:43:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: andreas.wpv</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/forget-google-seo-for-yahoo-and-msn-is-easy/8473/comment-page-1/#comment-1093431</link>
		<dc:creator>andreas.wpv</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 18:04:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=8473#comment-1093431</guid>
		<description>Done that for several companies, globally, and rule of thumb would be never to leave out these easy things. 

Apart from meeting all SE requirements it is a question of how much effort you can put into this to update. Many companies have huge systems running the sites, you cannot change the parameters so easily. 

And which SE you target depends quite some on product / brand / target group.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Done that for several companies, globally, and rule of thumb would be never to leave out these easy things. </p>
<p>Apart from meeting all SE requirements it is a question of how much effort you can put into this to update. Many companies have huge systems running the sites, you cannot change the parameters so easily. </p>
<p>And which SE you target depends quite some on product / brand / target group.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alicia Magda</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/forget-google-seo-for-yahoo-and-msn-is-easy/8473/comment-page-1/#comment-1093417</link>
		<dc:creator>Alicia Magda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 13:38:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=8473#comment-1093417</guid>
		<description>I head up an SEO department, and our clients tend to do much better in Yahoo! over Google. We&#039;re heavy on SEO content for our clients, so I do feel it is closely linked to that. I definitely have a lot of love for Yahoo!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I head up an SEO department, and our clients tend to do much better in Yahoo! over Google. We&#8217;re heavy on SEO content for our clients, so I do feel it is closely linked to that. I definitely have a lot of love for Yahoo!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alicia Magda</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/forget-google-seo-for-yahoo-and-msn-is-easy/8473/comment-page-1/#comment-1093416</link>
		<dc:creator>Alicia Magda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 13:37:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=8473#comment-1093416</guid>
		<description>I head up an SEO department, and our clients overwhelmingly do better in Yahoo! over Google. We&#039;re heavy on SEO content for our clients, so it&#039;s probably closely linked to that, but I definitely have a lot of love for Yahoo.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I head up an SEO department, and our clients overwhelmingly do better in Yahoo! over Google. We&#8217;re heavy on SEO content for our clients, so it&#8217;s probably closely linked to that, but I definitely have a lot of love for Yahoo.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Craig</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/forget-google-seo-for-yahoo-and-msn-is-easy/8473/comment-page-1/#comment-1093394</link>
		<dc:creator>Craig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 06:52:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=8473#comment-1093394</guid>
		<description>I have noticed for sometime that Yahoo always returns the most relevant results for my searches. Google is iffy and MSN acts like it&#039;s on drugs.

Excepts for Google maps,  I avoid Google like the plague.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have noticed for sometime that Yahoo always returns the most relevant results for my searches. Google is iffy and MSN acts like it&#8217;s on drugs.</p>
<p>Excepts for Google maps,  I avoid Google like the plague.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seo Sapien</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/forget-google-seo-for-yahoo-and-msn-is-easy/8473/comment-page-1/#comment-1093393</link>
		<dc:creator>Seo Sapien</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 05:42:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=8473#comment-1093393</guid>
		<description>It is normal for people to want to rank in google but MSN traffic is much more likely to buy anything than visitors coming from google. The same goes with yahoo. 

Google can highly increase unique visitors and clicks but a smaller percentage of those clicks will convert compared to live.com and yahoo.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is normal for people to want to rank in google but MSN traffic is much more likely to buy anything than visitors coming from google. The same goes with yahoo. </p>
<p>Google can highly increase unique visitors and clicks but a smaller percentage of those clicks will convert compared to live.com and yahoo.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Indian NGO</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/forget-google-seo-for-yahoo-and-msn-is-easy/8473/comment-page-1/#comment-1093392</link>
		<dc:creator>Indian NGO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 05:22:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=8473#comment-1093392</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s the matter of traffic that brings revenue to the site, So better target Top search engine rather targeting only one</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s the matter of traffic that brings revenue to the site, So better target Top search engine rather targeting only one</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Saad Kamal</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/forget-google-seo-for-yahoo-and-msn-is-easy/8473/comment-page-1/#comment-1093380</link>
		<dc:creator>Saad Kamal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 00:42:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=8473#comment-1093380</guid>
		<description>So what exactly are you suggesting for Live.com?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So what exactly are you suggesting for Live.com?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ricky. C</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/forget-google-seo-for-yahoo-and-msn-is-easy/8473/comment-page-1/#comment-1093353</link>
		<dc:creator>Ricky. C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Feb 2009 04:47:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=8473#comment-1093353</guid>
		<description>It doesn&#039;t matter from which search engine has gives me the most traffic. In my opinion, The more search engine you submit into, the more your site will get indexed and visited by many people</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It doesn&#8217;t matter from which search engine has gives me the most traffic. In my opinion, The more search engine you submit into, the more your site will get indexed and visited by many people</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SEOHighrank</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/forget-google-seo-for-yahoo-and-msn-is-easy/8473/comment-page-1/#comment-1093337</link>
		<dc:creator>SEOHighrank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Feb 2009 14:31:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=8473#comment-1093337</guid>
		<description>Hi Steve
Nice information but want to know how to make difference in optimization process for Yahoo and MSN with Google ? I think from one page we can not make target for Google and Yahoo at a time, we have to choose either one what do you think ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Steve<br />
Nice information but want to know how to make difference in optimization process for Yahoo and MSN with Google ? I think from one page we can not make target for Google and Yahoo at a time, we have to choose either one what do you think ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steve</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/forget-google-seo-for-yahoo-and-msn-is-easy/8473/comment-page-1/#comment-1093318</link>
		<dc:creator>steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 21:48:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=8473#comment-1093318</guid>
		<description>Loren:
MSN is next... i have 3 new clients who aren&#039;t doing to well in MSN.. so i am running experiments on 4 non-profits i do &quot;volunteering&quot; for.. and then i will plug those into the new clients after i do the initial baseline metrics, keyword and competitor studies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Loren:<br />
MSN is next&#8230; i have 3 new clients who aren&#8217;t doing to well in MSN.. so i am running experiments on 4 non-profits i do &#8220;volunteering&#8221; for.. and then i will plug those into the new clients after i do the initial baseline metrics, keyword and competitor studies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

