<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: StatCounter Reports Bing&#8217;s First&#160;Decline</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.searchenginejournal.com/statcounter-reports-bings-first-decline/13718/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/statcounter-reports-bings-first-decline/13718/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 16:48:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: jitabigue</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/statcounter-reports-bings-first-decline/13718/comment-page-1/#comment-1127957</link>
		<dc:creator>jitabigue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 14:26:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=13718#comment-1127957</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m sure google SE will still be the best search engine even after ten years. Unless, there&#039;s someone brilliant enough to have an idea to overwhelmed search engines...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m sure google SE will still be the best search engine even after ten years. Unless, there&#8217;s someone brilliant enough to have an idea to overwhelmed search engines&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jerri Cook</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/statcounter-reports-bings-first-decline/13718/comment-page-1/#comment-1120096</link>
		<dc:creator>Jerri Cook</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 13:46:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=13718#comment-1120096</guid>
		<description>I think you&#039;re correct--it&#039;s a marketing issue. I advertise and search with Bing. I prefer it to Google.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you&#8217;re correct&#8211;it&#8217;s a marketing issue. I advertise and search with Bing. I prefer it to Google.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mikey T</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/statcounter-reports-bings-first-decline/13718/comment-page-1/#comment-1120091</link>
		<dc:creator>Mikey T</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 13:33:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=13718#comment-1120091</guid>
		<description>I agree. I also think that more &quot;monsters&quot; competing with Google will push the search envelope faster and farther than we thought. Although Google innovates and creates on almost a daily basis, a stronger group of direct competition would force new ways of thinking outside of the search engine box.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree. I also think that more &#8220;monsters&#8221; competing with Google will push the search envelope faster and farther than we thought. Although Google innovates and creates on almost a daily basis, a stronger group of direct competition would force new ways of thinking outside of the search engine box.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IMGuru</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/statcounter-reports-bings-first-decline/13718/comment-page-1/#comment-1120016</link>
		<dc:creator>IMGuru</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 11:11:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=13718#comment-1120016</guid>
		<description>Its too late for any search engine to  beat Google currently.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Its too late for any search engine to  beat Google currently.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Seng</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/statcounter-reports-bings-first-decline/13718/comment-page-1/#comment-1119879</link>
		<dc:creator>John Seng</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 05:33:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=13718#comment-1119879</guid>
		<description>Sorry to hear that, I think it&#039;s a better thing having more big monsters like Google in the market, so we don&#039;t rely on Google too much. Hope Bing and Yahoo! would rise soon, and also hope more search engines like Google launched.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry to hear that, I think it&#8217;s a better thing having more big monsters like Google in the market, so we don&#8217;t rely on Google too much. Hope Bing and Yahoo! would rise soon, and also hope more search engines like Google launched.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jordan Foutz</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/statcounter-reports-bings-first-decline/13718/comment-page-1/#comment-1119791</link>
		<dc:creator>Jordan Foutz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 02:02:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=13718#comment-1119791</guid>
		<description>This isn&#039;t too terribly surprising. I was bored last week and went Binging for a new Imac and couldn&#039;t find one for the life of me. Irrelevant results and just overall SE fail. I got over to Google gasping for results goodness and found everything i needed within the first five results. I&#039;m surprised their share isn&#039;t more than 80%.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This isn&#8217;t too terribly surprising. I was bored last week and went Binging for a new Imac and couldn&#8217;t find one for the life of me. Irrelevant results and just overall SE fail. I got over to Google gasping for results goodness and found everything i needed within the first five results. I&#8217;m surprised their share isn&#8217;t more than 80%.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

