AOL Overruled : vs.

SMS Text

Today a U.S. federal appeals court ruled that AOL Inc cannot stop Inc (known to many in the search industry as ABCSearch) from using a brand name similar to, an AOL property and decade old ad network.

This is a pretty interesting ruling, not only in the world of competitive advertising, as positions itself to be like, and the room for confusion is very wide. But also in the world of domaining and trademarks, as the ruling states that “” mark is generic enough not to warrant protection. Speaking from experience, it’s very tough to land a trademark ruling for a generic term (like “advertising” or “search engine journal”) as opposed to a unique name or brand (like “Ruffles” or “Google”).

More from Jonathan Stempel @ Reuters / Yahoo :

The term conveys “only the generic nature” of the services offered and that it is “certainly highly unlikely that consumer surveys or other evidence might ultimately demonstrate that AOL’s mark is valid and protectable.”

Have you ever gotten and mixed up?

Loren Baker
Loren Baker is the Founder of SEJ, an Advisor at Alpha Brand Media and runs Foundation Digital, a digital marketing strategy & development agency.
Loren Baker
Subscribe to SEJ!
Get our weekly newsletter from SEJ's Founder Loren Baker about the latest news in the industry!
  • traffic school california

    i support the outcome result from court as they do vary in different aspects and indeed the Trademark issue too. you made it very clear about the topic.

  • Maryjohn

    This is a pretty interesting