<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Desktop Search versus Microsoft Windows&#160;Search</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.searchenginejournal.com/google-desktop-search-versus-microsoft-windows-search/968/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/google-desktop-search-versus-microsoft-windows-search/968/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 22:19:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: matlyhew</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/google-desktop-search-versus-microsoft-windows-search/968/comment-page-1/#comment-1271642</link>
		<dc:creator>matlyhew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2010 19:57:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=968#comment-1271642</guid>
		<description>If it comes to search in my opinion the one and only one is Lookeen!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If it comes to search in my opinion the one and only one is Lookeen!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: matlyhew</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/google-desktop-search-versus-microsoft-windows-search/968/comment-page-1/#comment-1231471</link>
		<dc:creator>matlyhew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2010 14:57:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=968#comment-1231471</guid>
		<description>If it comes to search in my opinion the one and only one is Lookeen!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If it comes to search in my opinion the one and only one is Lookeen!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: çet</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/google-desktop-search-versus-microsoft-windows-search/968/comment-page-1/#comment-1099312</link>
		<dc:creator>çet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 12:15:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=968#comment-1099312</guid>
		<description>Chat and FriendS ..thankS you..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chat and FriendS ..thankS you..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#111;nl&#105;n&#101; p&#111;k&#101;r</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/google-desktop-search-versus-microsoft-windows-search/968/comment-page-1/#comment-33209</link>
		<dc:creator>&#111;nl&#105;n&#101; p&#111;k&#101;r</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Jan 2005 23:12:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=968#comment-33209</guid>
		<description>I come to your site because it keeps me entertained and aware of new things.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I come to your site because it keeps me entertained and aware of new things.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rod Trent</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/google-desktop-search-versus-microsoft-windows-search/968/comment-page-1/#comment-4482</link>
		<dc:creator>Rod Trent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Oct 2004 14:53:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=968#comment-4482</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;myITforum Daily Newsletter; October 20, 2004&lt;/strong&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>myITforum Daily Newsletter; October 20, 2004</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Danish Munir</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/google-desktop-search-versus-microsoft-windows-search/968/comment-page-1/#comment-4476</link>
		<dc:creator>Danish Munir</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Oct 2004 10:08:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=968#comment-4476</guid>
		<description>I agree google desktop search is fast, powerful and VERY intuitive and user friendly. But honestly it PALES in comparison to Copernic Desktop Search (CDS) www.copernic.com CDS not only does EVERYTHING google desktop search does, but it makes it, if u can believe it, EVEN MORE INTUITIVE, and friendly. Believe me guys, if uve tried googles stuff, give this one a shot too. u&#039;ll love it. 

PS: Copernic Desktop Search is free too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree google desktop search is fast, powerful and VERY intuitive and user friendly. But honestly it PALES in comparison to Copernic Desktop Search (CDS) <a href="http://www.copernic.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.copernic.com</a> CDS not only does EVERYTHING google desktop search does, but it makes it, if u can believe it, EVEN MORE INTUITIVE, and friendly. Believe me guys, if uve tried googles stuff, give this one a shot too. u&#8217;ll love it. </p>
<p>PS: Copernic Desktop Search is free too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: amit agarwal</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/google-desktop-search-versus-microsoft-windows-search/968/comment-page-1/#comment-4468</link>
		<dc:creator>amit agarwal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Oct 2004 08:05:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=968#comment-4468</guid>
		<description>Does anyone remember that great tool from Altavista which indexed hard-disk and could be docked at the top of the screen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does anyone remember that great tool from Altavista which indexed hard-disk and could be docked at the top of the screen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon C</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/google-desktop-search-versus-microsoft-windows-search/968/comment-page-1/#comment-4467</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Oct 2004 00:43:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=968#comment-4467</guid>
		<description>Now if they would only make that little search engine search through my MSN Messenger logs</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now if they would only make that little search engine search through my MSN Messenger logs</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Loren Baker</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/google-desktop-search-versus-microsoft-windows-search/968/comment-page-1/#comment-4466</link>
		<dc:creator>Loren Baker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Oct 2004 20:31:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=968#comment-4466</guid>
		<description>Not that everyone is just centered on Google Desktop, it&#039;s brand spankin&#039; new, and interesting, that&#039;s why it&#039;s getting so much play. Here&#039;s where Search Engine Journal covered &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.searchenginejournal.com/index.php?p=394&quot;&gt;HotBot Desktop Search&lt;/a&gt; last year. Enjoy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not that everyone is just centered on Google Desktop, it&#8217;s brand spankin&#8217; new, and interesting, that&#8217;s why it&#8217;s getting so much play. Here&#8217;s where Search Engine Journal covered <a href="http://www.searchenginejournal.com/index.php?p=394">HotBot Desktop Search</a> last year. Enjoy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leland G Whitlock</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/google-desktop-search-versus-microsoft-windows-search/968/comment-page-1/#comment-4465</link>
		<dc:creator>Leland G Whitlock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Oct 2004 20:24:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=968#comment-4465</guid>
		<description>Why is it everyone thinks Google was the first serach engine to put out a desktop search tool?  Hotbot actually gets that honer and in many ways I like it better than Google&#039;s desktop serach tool.  See for yourself, check it out at http://www.hotbot.com/tools/.  I&#039;m not saying this for any reason other than I think it&#039;s good to have choices.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why is it everyone thinks Google was the first serach engine to put out a desktop search tool?  Hotbot actually gets that honer and in many ways I like it better than Google&#8217;s desktop serach tool.  See for yourself, check it out at <a href="http://www.hotbot.com/tools/" rel="nofollow">http://www.hotbot.com/tools/</a>.  I&#8217;m not saying this for any reason other than I think it&#8217;s good to have choices.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

