Comments on: Google PageRank is for Entertainment Purposes Only http://www.searchenginejournal.com/google-pagerank-is-for-entertainment-purposes-only/1105/ Tue, 14 Feb 2012 17:43:21 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v= By: Keith Holloway http://www.searchenginejournal.com/google-pagerank-is-for-entertainment-purposes-only/1105/comment-page-1/#comment-184989 Keith Holloway Thu, 15 Jun 2006 19:39:07 +0000 http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=1105#comment-184989 It's more than just one employees' opinion at Google. It's posted on their site somewhere - but I cannot find it at the moment. With that said, I use PR all of the time to judge sites, but I take it with a grain of salt for the reasons mentioned. It’s more than just one employees’ opinion at Google. It’s posted on their site somewhere – but I cannot find it at the moment.

With that said, I use PR all of the time to judge sites, but I take it with a grain of salt for the reasons mentioned.

]]> By: Bukaboo.com http://www.searchenginejournal.com/google-pagerank-is-for-entertainment-purposes-only/1105/comment-page-1/#comment-30797 Bukaboo.com Fri, 07 Jan 2005 19:20:24 +0000 http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=1105#comment-30797 You really must investigate this matter, very well,contact Google about it, "Google page rank is for entertainment purposes only" only then you will know the truth. You really must investigate this matter, very well,contact Google about it, “Google page rank is for entertainment purposes only” only then you will know the truth.

]]> By: みよしてつおのぼやき部屋 http://www.searchenginejournal.com/google-pagerank-is-for-entertainment-purposes-only/1105/comment-page-1/#comment-13128 みよしてつおのぼやき部屋 Fri, 03 Dec 2004 06:42:26 +0000 http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=1105#comment-13128 <strong>Googleトリビア</strong> Google PageRank is for Entertainment Pur... Googleトリビア
Google PageRank is for Entertainment Pur…

]]> By: Jon http://www.searchenginejournal.com/google-pagerank-is-for-entertainment-purposes-only/1105/comment-page-1/#comment-12986 Jon Thu, 02 Dec 2004 21:37:27 +0000 http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=1105#comment-12986 I have to agree with GoogleGuy and the post as well as the source are misleading. Key point is that the Google toolbar is everywhere and PageRank is critical to ranking. This means website owners will judge sites because it provides a measure albeit an old one. Jon I have to agree with GoogleGuy and the post as well as the source are misleading. Key point is that the Google toolbar is everywhere and PageRank is critical to ranking. This means website owners will judge sites because it provides a measure albeit an old one.

Jon

]]> By: Loren Baker http://www.searchenginejournal.com/google-pagerank-is-for-entertainment-purposes-only/1105/comment-page-1/#comment-12914 Loren Baker Thu, 02 Dec 2004 14:12:09 +0000 http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=1105#comment-12914 Thank you for your input GoogleGuy, we'll be sure to look into this and post a follow up. Thank you for your input GoogleGuy, we’ll be sure to look into this and post a follow up.

]]> By: trying http://www.searchenginejournal.com/google-pagerank-is-for-entertainment-purposes-only/1105/comment-page-1/#comment-12731 trying Thu, 02 Dec 2004 01:23:14 +0000 http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=1105#comment-12731 <strong>Google PageRank is for Entertainment Purposes Only</strong> » Google PageRank is for Entertainment Purposes Only - Search... Google PageRank is for Entertainment Purposes Only
» Google PageRank is for Entertainment Purposes Only – Search…

]]> By: GoogleGuy http://www.searchenginejournal.com/google-pagerank-is-for-entertainment-purposes-only/1105/comment-page-1/#comment-12611 GoogleGuy Wed, 01 Dec 2004 22:56:13 +0000 http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=1105#comment-12611 I'd strongly disagree with the statement that the toolbar PageRank is for "entertainment purposes only"--millions of toolbar users use the PageRank display to judge the quality of pages. I think it's also a little irresponsible to quote JohnGalt claiming to talk to some random person at Google, and then for you to quote it as a reponse from Google, which makes it sound more official. I'm happy to refute that this is any sort of official stance. I’d strongly disagree with the statement that the toolbar PageRank is for “entertainment purposes only”–millions of toolbar users use the PageRank display to judge the quality of pages. I think it’s also a little irresponsible to quote JohnGalt claiming to talk to some random person at Google, and then for you to quote it as a reponse from Google, which makes it sound more official. I’m happy to refute that this is any sort of official stance.

]]>