<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Expands One Line SiteLinks : Little Blue Links in&#160;SERPS</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.searchenginejournal.com/google-one-line-sitelinks/9674/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/google-one-line-sitelinks/9674/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 09:28:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: sohbet</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/google-one-line-sitelinks/9674/comment-page-1/#comment-1102543</link>
		<dc:creator>sohbet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Jun 2009 11:03:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=9674#comment-1102543</guid>
		<description>thankks you

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.tcsohbet.net/&quot; title=&quot;sohbet, chat&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;sohbet&lt;/a&gt;       &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.tcsohbet.net/&quot; title=&quot;chat, sohbet&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;chat&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thankks you</p>
<p><a href="http://www.tcsohbet.net/" title="sohbet, chat" rel="nofollow">sohbet</a>       <a href="http://www.tcsohbet.net/" title="chat, sohbet" rel="nofollow">chat</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Catfish</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/google-one-line-sitelinks/9674/comment-page-1/#comment-1097668</link>
		<dc:creator>Catfish</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 16:23:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=9674#comment-1097668</guid>
		<description>What I don&#039;t like about site links is when someone gets them unfairly for a generic term that happens to be close to their URL.  For example, why does Gamespot get a site link for &quot;video games&quot;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What I don&#8217;t like about site links is when someone gets them unfairly for a generic term that happens to be close to their URL.  For example, why does Gamespot get a site link for &#8220;video games&#8221;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barry Welford</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/google-one-line-sitelinks/9674/comment-page-1/#comment-1097662</link>
		<dc:creator>Barry Welford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 13:12:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=9674#comment-1097662</guid>
		<description>This is an excellent feature in reducing the real estate for any given entry.  I can&#039;t wait until it becomes universal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is an excellent feature in reducing the real estate for any given entry.  I can&#8217;t wait until it becomes universal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin March</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/google-one-line-sitelinks/9674/comment-page-1/#comment-1097644</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin March</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 08:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=9674#comment-1097644</guid>
		<description>I like the feature gives more info to the searcher which is only good.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the feature gives more info to the searcher which is only good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seemyspots</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/google-one-line-sitelinks/9674/comment-page-1/#comment-1097612</link>
		<dc:creator>Seemyspots</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 20:17:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=9674#comment-1097612</guid>
		<description>Max,

I am not sure if this is exactly what you are looking for but, I do have a client: http://www.pressreleasesolutions.com that offers traditional and online PR services.  I also know that he has years of traditional media experience and he may be able to at least guide you in the right direction.   I hope this helps.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Max,</p>
<p>I am not sure if this is exactly what you are looking for but, I do have a client: <a href="http://www.pressreleasesolutions.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.pressreleasesolutions.com</a> that offers traditional and online PR services.  I also know that he has years of traditional media experience and he may be able to at least guide you in the right direction.   I hope this helps.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Max Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/google-one-line-sitelinks/9674/comment-page-1/#comment-1097604</link>
		<dc:creator>Max Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 19:00:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=9674#comment-1097604</guid>
		<description>Google and other search engines put a lot of importance on online media reports. If a website was featured in CNN.com, WSJ.com or other major online publications, it will rank much higher than the sites which have hundreds of link-farm-generated links. Does anybody know of a good list of PR firms specializing in online publicity? Publicity Guaranteed (PublicityGuaranteed.com) looks like an attractive option, as they only charge for the results, without any retainers or hourly rates; however they don’t do online-only publicity. AllPublicits.com seems to be the most comprehensive database of publicists and I posted there my RFP for publicists to bid on, but all resulting bids included traditional media. If I had a larger budget, I wouldn’t mind good coverage in traditional media, but I only seek publicity for my SEO campaign, so I need online publicity only</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google and other search engines put a lot of importance on online media reports. If a website was featured in CNN.com, WSJ.com or other major online publications, it will rank much higher than the sites which have hundreds of link-farm-generated links. Does anybody know of a good list of PR firms specializing in online publicity? Publicity Guaranteed (PublicityGuaranteed.com) looks like an attractive option, as they only charge for the results, without any retainers or hourly rates; however they don’t do online-only publicity. AllPublicits.com seems to be the most comprehensive database of publicists and I posted there my RFP for publicists to bid on, but all resulting bids included traditional media. If I had a larger budget, I wouldn’t mind good coverage in traditional media, but I only seek publicity for my SEO campaign, so I need online publicity only</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Gaudet</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/google-one-line-sitelinks/9674/comment-page-1/#comment-1097592</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Gaudet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 14:46:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=9674#comment-1097592</guid>
		<description>I think this is great because there is less real estate being taken. I wish Google would change the default to 20 links on the first page. I know I can change my personal settings, but people don&#039;t do that. And now the first page is full of YouTube videos and Wiki pedia. there is only 2 real informational items on the first page now..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think this is great because there is less real estate being taken. I wish Google would change the default to 20 links on the first page. I know I can change my personal settings, but people don&#8217;t do that. And now the first page is full of YouTube videos and Wiki pedia. there is only 2 real informational items on the first page now..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

