<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Does Image Search Traffic&#160;Convert?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.searchenginejournal.com/does-image-search-traffic-convert/6000/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/does-image-search-traffic-convert/6000/</link>
	<description>Latest Search Engine News from the Search Engine Journal</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 14:34:20 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ask Questions</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/does-image-search-traffic-convert/6000/comment-page-1/#comment-1107121</link>
		<dc:creator>Ask Questions</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 12:10:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/does-image-search-traffic-convert/6000/#comment-1107121</guid>
		<description>I get a lot of traffic for terms like yamaha fz 16 and children allergies which rank # 1 on G images.
I am not sure how to monetize this traffic. perhaps using a poppup cpa offer may help.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I get a lot of traffic for terms like yamaha fz 16 and children allergies which rank # 1 on G images.<br />
I am not sure how to monetize this traffic. perhaps using a poppup cpa offer may help.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joseph</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/does-image-search-traffic-convert/6000/comment-page-1/#comment-1104408</link>
		<dc:creator>joseph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 18:15:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/does-image-search-traffic-convert/6000/#comment-1104408</guid>
		<description>i have soccer wallpapers site and half the traffic from image search.they convert very bad less than 1% adsense ctr</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i have soccer wallpapers site and half the traffic from image search.they convert very bad less than 1% adsense ctr</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hegabya</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/does-image-search-traffic-convert/6000/comment-page-1/#comment-1077439</link>
		<dc:creator>hegabya</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 15:03:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/does-image-search-traffic-convert/6000/#comment-1077439</guid>
		<description>i wiill be thanks for that</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i wiill be thanks for that</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Content Writer</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/does-image-search-traffic-convert/6000/comment-page-1/#comment-1076374</link>
		<dc:creator>Content Writer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 03:00:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/does-image-search-traffic-convert/6000/#comment-1076374</guid>
		<description>I get hundreds of uniques for a very popular search term but from Image search.
However I am very disappointed with the revenue result.
I am tryng hard to convert them but the Image results are not that beneficial. Thanks to my server who is able to handle high bandwidth but truth is such  results consume too much of the site bandwidth.
My last months bandwidth used for a high traffic site solely from image search was 1.5 gb!!!
Revenue : $8 just enough for my hosting costs :(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I get hundreds of uniques for a very popular search term but from Image search.<br />
However I am very disappointed with the revenue result.<br />
I am tryng hard to convert them but the Image results are not that beneficial. Thanks to my server who is able to handle high bandwidth but truth is such  results consume too much of the site bandwidth.<br />
My last months bandwidth used for a high traffic site solely from image search was 1.5 gb!!!<br />
Revenue : $8 just enough for my hosting costs :(</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Exi</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/does-image-search-traffic-convert/6000/comment-page-1/#comment-1017762</link>
		<dc:creator>Exi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Mar 2008 16:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/does-image-search-traffic-convert/6000/#comment-1017762</guid>
		<description>hello
buy google image traffic!
Iсq 274-37-5997</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hello<br />
buy google image traffic!<br />
Iсq 274-37-5997</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CBR</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/does-image-search-traffic-convert/6000/comment-page-1/#comment-893017</link>
		<dc:creator>CBR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2008 04:20:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/does-image-search-traffic-convert/6000/#comment-893017</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve heard it&#039;s mostly people looking for images they can lift for their sites or whatever project they are working on. I don&#039;t see great conversion from it but then again I don&#039;t get huge amounts of it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve heard it&#8217;s mostly people looking for images they can lift for their sites or whatever project they are working on. I don&#8217;t see great conversion from it but then again I don&#8217;t get huge amounts of it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simlock verwijderen</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/does-image-search-traffic-convert/6000/comment-page-1/#comment-873666</link>
		<dc:creator>Simlock verwijderen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 15:26:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/does-image-search-traffic-convert/6000/#comment-873666</guid>
		<description>Not at all. It is how you optimize it and on which conversion keyword the are coming inside.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not at all. It is how you optimize it and on which conversion keyword the are coming inside.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Utah SEO</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/does-image-search-traffic-convert/6000/comment-page-1/#comment-774314</link>
		<dc:creator>Utah SEO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Dec 2007 08:40:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/does-image-search-traffic-convert/6000/#comment-774314</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s best to run a JavaScript that removes the topframe of any referring site (like Google images, tutorialized.com, etc.) so they can actually land on your site.

if (parent.frames.length
&gt; 0) top.location.replace(document.location);</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s best to run a JavaScript that removes the topframe of any referring site (like Google images, tutorialized.com, etc.) so they can actually land on your site.</p>
<p>if (parent.frames.length<br />
&gt; 0) top.location.replace(document.location);</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leapfrogg</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/does-image-search-traffic-convert/6000/comment-page-1/#comment-737588</link>
		<dc:creator>Leapfrogg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 09:46:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/does-image-search-traffic-convert/6000/#comment-737588</guid>
		<description>I agree with Website Promotion Service, many of our clients see a good amount of traffic from images. Provided the images on their sites are relevant to their business or product offering (which really should be the case) there is no reason that good relevant copy on the image page can&#039;t convert a reasonable amount of visitors.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Website Promotion Service, many of our clients see a good amount of traffic from images. Provided the images on their sites are relevant to their business or product offering (which really should be the case) there is no reason that good relevant copy on the image page can&#8217;t convert a reasonable amount of visitors.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Website Promotion Service</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/does-image-search-traffic-convert/6000/comment-page-1/#comment-734744</link>
		<dc:creator>Website Promotion Service</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Nov 2007 18:47:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/does-image-search-traffic-convert/6000/#comment-734744</guid>
		<description>Image search is not as popular as organic search. But I think any source of traffic to a site is good. It is up to your sales copy that determines the conversion rate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Image search is not as popular as organic search. But I think any source of traffic to a site is good. It is up to your sales copy that determines the conversion rate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
