<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Research Firm Says Yahoo, MSN, &amp; Google Have Major Page-Caching&#160;Flaw</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.searchenginejournal.com/research-firm-says-yahoo-msn-google-have-major-page-caching-flaw/6071/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/research-firm-says-yahoo-msn-google-have-major-page-caching-flaw/6071/</link>
	<description>Latest Search Engine News from the Search Engine Journal</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 14:34:20 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Alphane Moon</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/research-firm-says-yahoo-msn-google-have-major-page-caching-flaw/6071/comment-page-1/#comment-779496</link>
		<dc:creator>Alphane Moon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 12:28:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/research-firm-says-yahoo-msn-google-have-major-page-caching-flaw/6071/#comment-779496</guid>
		<description>Oh yes, removed pages can be found in the cache of some search engines for eternity.

I&#039;m not a big fan of the &quot;cache&quot; functionality, since it has sometimes be exploited by scrapers to steal content from websites. &quot;noarchive&quot; is a good idea.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh yes, removed pages can be found in the cache of some search engines for eternity.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not a big fan of the &#8220;cache&#8221; functionality, since it has sometimes be exploited by scrapers to steal content from websites. &#8220;noarchive&#8221; is a good idea.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: g1smd</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/research-firm-says-yahoo-msn-google-have-major-page-caching-flaw/6071/comment-page-1/#comment-772483</link>
		<dc:creator>g1smd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2007 23:55:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/research-firm-says-yahoo-msn-google-have-major-page-caching-flaw/6071/#comment-772483</guid>
		<description>&quot;od&quot; should be &quot;of&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;od&#8221; should be &#8220;of&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: g1smd</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/research-firm-says-yahoo-msn-google-have-major-page-caching-flaw/6071/comment-page-1/#comment-772482</link>
		<dc:creator>g1smd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2007 23:55:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/research-firm-says-yahoo-msn-google-have-major-page-caching-flaw/6071/#comment-772482</guid>
		<description>This would be a bigger problem with sites like archive.org as they keep old pages forever by design.

With search engines the old pages are eventually dropped, some in a matter od days to weeks. 

Be aware that Google can keep some old pages for a year when they are in the Supplemental Index.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This would be a bigger problem with sites like archive.org as they keep old pages forever by design.</p>
<p>With search engines the old pages are eventually dropped, some in a matter od days to weeks. </p>
<p>Be aware that Google can keep some old pages for a year when they are in the Supplemental Index.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jaan Kanellis</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/research-firm-says-yahoo-msn-google-have-major-page-caching-flaw/6071/comment-page-1/#comment-772289</link>
		<dc:creator>Jaan Kanellis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2007 21:19:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/research-firm-says-yahoo-msn-google-have-major-page-caching-flaw/6071/#comment-772289</guid>
		<description>Well if Google (and other SE&#039;s) removed 404 or missing pages faster this would not be an issue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well if Google (and other SE&#8217;s) removed 404 or missing pages faster this would not be an issue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
