Headlines can be powerful. I think most marketers would agree that a strong headline can be both intriguing and enticing, and can help drive a surge in short term traffic. However, I’m also sure that most SEO’s would question the long term impact of using creative headlines on their search engine rankings. There are times I work with a client’s editorial staff to explain and clarify aspects of SEO, including the importance of keyword research, content optimization, the power of inbound links, etc.
It usually doesn’t take long before a shoe is thrown at my head from across the conference room. That happens when I tell people that creative and clever headlines aren’t great for long-term sustained traffic from natural search. If I’m lucky, the flying shoe is coming from someone with bad accuracy (or with small feet).
Being an avid blogger, I completely understand the power of a great headline, however, the SEO in me knows how important search traffic is… Most SEO’s, including myself, recommend creating descriptive titles based on keyword research. For example, if you are writing about the features of Google Wave, you should make sure that the keywords Google, Wave, and Features are in the title, even though you could probably come up with several clever titles based on Wave. For example, Surf the Google Wave, a Tsunami of Google Proportions, Hang 10 with Google Wave, etc.
The reason SEO’s recommend descriptive titles based on keyword research is because many have analyzed traffic across numerous sites and know how important optimized title tags are, which are often pulled from the title of the article or blog post. I said “often” and not “always” and I’ll explain more about that later. When natural search can sometimes be a majority of a site’s traffic, it’s hard to ignore optimizing content to attract longer-term, sustained traffic from organic search. Sure, the clever headline can produce a spike in short term traffic, but it might not generate the long term effect that a well optimized title can.
My SEO Headline Test, Let’s Conduct Some Searches
Going back to the shoe throwing incident mentioned earlier, someone (usually the person championing SEO) calls off the bombardment long enough for me to start showing some examples. Conducting searches and compiling results based on a client’s industry and focus typically provides some great data that’s hard to ignore. As I’ve said in previous posts, I’m a big fan of backing your recommendations based on data and not opinion (unless you want to sit in a conference room debating all day).
I decided to conduct searches on several topics and see which pages rank highly in the SERPs. Specifically, we’ll look at article or post titles to see how well optimized they are. After which, we’ll reverse it and check the rankings of some posts that I know used clever headlines versus optimized titles (although I won’t show you the actual posts… I’m not here to point out editors who chose to use a creative headline.) During the test, I checked Google, Yahoo, and Bing, but in order to keep this post manageable, I’ll include notes below from just Google. In case you are wondering, I didn’t notice any major differences in Yahoo or Bing for the searches I conducted.
Quick disclaimer: There are obviously a number of factors that go into high search engine rankings and optimized title tags is just one of the factors. Other factors, such as domain strength, on-page optimization, inbound links, anchor text, internal linking, etc. all influence rankings. For this post, we’ll just focus on analyzing the titles of each article (and title tags). With that out of the way, let’s begin.
For each query, I will provide the number of listings in the top ten organic rankings (excluding blended news) that I believe have creative or clever headlines versus optimized titles. And yes, “creative” is subjective, but I’m referring to a headline that’s catchy, amusing, funny, shocking, etc. that isn’t necessarily optimized for the keywords the editors would want to rank for. Note, you might see slightly different results when testing these searches, as rankings are always changing.
- The only two listings that didn’t have all three keywords in the title were from Apple! But, those two listings were for a guided tour of the new iPhone and the technical specifications.
- The other seven organic listings all had the keywords in the title tag.
- The two video results in universal search contained target keywords in the title.
- The three blog posts listed in universal search also had the keywords in the title.
- None of the listings would be considered creative or clever.
- All ten listings had at least two of the keywords in each title tag. Most of the listings had all of them in the title.
- None of the headlines or titles would be considered clever or creative.
- Eight of the top ten listings had the target keywords in the title.
- The two listings that weren’t perfectly optimized were from Facebook! (Similar to what I listed above for Apple.)
- None of the top listings had titles that would be considered creative or clever.
- All eight of the organic listings had optimized headlines.
- None of the top listings used a creative or clever headline.
- Both video results showing in universal search had the keywords in the video title.
- The three blog posts listed in universal search also had the keywords in the title.
- Seven of the top ten listings had the keywords Google, wave, and features in the title.
- There were three listings in the top ten that were creatively written (although not too far off from being optimized).
- However, the three pages with less than optimized titles are all major players in covering online marketing and technology.
- All ten listings contained target keywords in the title (and were at least partially optimized).
- The only title that wasn’t heavily optimized was for the official health reform website. Go figure.
- Still, none of the top listings could be classified as using creative or clever headlines.
- All ten results contained target keywords in the title.
- There were definitely a few headlines that mixed creativity with optimized titles. It’s part of a combo approach that I’ll explain later in my post.
- All ten listings had the target keywords in the title.
- None of the listings had titles that would be considered creative or clever.
OK, I think you get the picture. Not every article title tag was perfectly optimized, but you can clearly see how important title optimization is.
Let’s Reverse It and Check Some Creative Headlines. And yes, there are exceptions to the rule…
During my research, I chose ten articles that clearly used creative and clever headlines versus optimized titles (and they were great headlines.) Most were on relatively powerful sites from an SEO standpoint. I analyzed each article and checked its rankings for what I determined to be target keywords.
8 of the 10 articles did not rank in the top listings in Google, Yahoo, or Bing, although they were great articles about the subject at hand (and on powerful sites from an SEO standpoint). My guess is that if they would have better optimized each post, including writing optimized title tags, the posts would have ranked much higher. Unfortunately, if you go with a creative title, you risk low rankings… I’m not saying to always go down the path of using an optimized title, but you should understand the risks involved if you don’t. For example, if a killer headline is important for the task at hand, and long term traffic from search is not critical, then run with it. However, if you are looking to build sustained traffic from search, then rethink your approach and use optimized titles (or use the combo approach I explain below).
A Few Exceptions to the Rule
There were two articles out of the ten that ranked highly even though their titles weren’t optimized at all. Both articles were on ultra-powerful sites from an SEO perspective that focus heavily on the verticals covered in each article. Interestingly, each article didn’t build up a lot of inbound links. It looked like each site’s SEO strength enabled the articles to rank highly. Both posts rank in the top ten listings in Google for competitive keywords, while hundreds of other pages that are better optimized for those keywords fail to reach page one. I’m sure every SEO reading this post has several examples of webpages that they are trying to beat out that also aren’t optimized well! Welcome to SEO.
Striking a Balance With Title Optimization, What Can You Do?
By now, you are probably wondering if there is anything you can do that strikes a balance between great headlines and optimized titles. There are definitely a few things you can try out.
1. Separate Your Headline, Kicker, and Title Tag Using this approach, you can ensure your headline and kicker are creative, but also have a well optimized title tag. For example, check out the link below. The headline is Clunker Confusion: MPG Figures, but when you hit the page, the title tag reads EPA Changes fuel economy numbers ahead ‘Cash for Clunkers’. Your CMS will just need to support breaking apart the post title and the title tag (which not every CMS can do). Then your editors can have their creative headlines and your SEO manager can have an optimized title tag.
2. The Combo Approach – Using a 2-Part Title For Your Headline and Title Tag This involves starting your title tag with a creative headline, but ending it with your optimized segment (or vice versa). Using this approach, you can grab someone’s attention while still having target keywords in the title tag. A good example is my post about Twitter Account ownership. I titled it Lawyers, Guns, and Twitter – Who Owns your Twitter Account. Another example would be a recent post from TechCrunch titled Search Smackdown: Bing Vs. Google. Both are good examples of using a creative first segment followed by target keywords in the second part of the title.
So there you have it. A rundown on how important title optimization is, along with a few recommendations for your own articles and posts. There’s always a balance between creativity and SEO, and you need to decide if long term, sustained traffic is more important or if a potential short term surge in traffic would suffice. Based on heavily analyzing website traffic for clients, I’d go with an optimized title or the combo approach I mentioned above. Search engine traffic is too important to ignore.
Glenn Gabe is an online marketing consultant at G-Squared Interactive and focuses heavily on SEO, SEM, Social Media Marketing, Viral Marketing and Web Analytics. You can read more of Glenn’s posts on his blog, The Internet Marketing Driver and you can follow him on Twitter to keep up with his latest projects, news, and updates.