<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fundamental flaw with Link&#160;Popularity</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.searchenginejournal.com/fundamental-flaw-with-link-popularity/630/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/fundamental-flaw-with-link-popularity/630/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 15:12:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ph&#101;nt&#101;rm&#105;n&#101;</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/fundamental-flaw-with-link-popularity/630/comment-page-1/#comment-23842</link>
		<dc:creator>ph&#101;nt&#101;rm&#105;n&#101;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Dec 2004 20:03:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=630#comment-23842</guid>
		<description>Nice website</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice website</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bryan Sambrook</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/fundamental-flaw-with-link-popularity/630/comment-page-1/#comment-678</link>
		<dc:creator>Bryan Sambrook</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jun 2004 13:08:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=630#comment-678</guid>
		<description>I think in the future, many search engines (including Google), will not rely on &quot;link popularity&quot;. Instead social networking will play a key role in determing a sites ranking.

-Bryan Sambrook&lt;br&gt;
President&lt;br&gt;
Acez Software&lt;br&gt;
http://www.acez.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think in the future, many search engines (including Google), will not rely on &#8220;link popularity&#8221;. Instead social networking will play a key role in determing a sites ranking.</p>
<p>-Bryan Sambrook<br />
President<br />
Acez Software<br />
<a href="http://www.acez.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.acez.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Lauher</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/fundamental-flaw-with-link-popularity/630/comment-page-1/#comment-655</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Lauher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jun 2004 22:44:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=630#comment-655</guid>
		<description>Actually, lingering PR from old domains is something that Google has been trying to address for over a year now.  The &quot;meat&quot; of this story is that the domain for the old search engine, Magellan, has been acquired by a real estate company.  The fact that they rank well for a non-relevant term is probably old news.  I was in the mood to rant.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, lingering PR from old domains is something that Google has been trying to address for over a year now.  The &#8220;meat&#8221; of this story is that the domain for the old search engine, Magellan, has been acquired by a real estate company.  The fact that they rank well for a non-relevant term is probably old news.  I was in the mood to rant.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

