<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 5 Reasons Not To Use&#160;Flash</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.searchenginejournal.com/5-reasons-not-to-use-flash/3949/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/5-reasons-not-to-use-flash/3949/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 09:28:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: austin web design</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/5-reasons-not-to-use-flash/3949/comment-page-1/#comment-1271709</link>
		<dc:creator>austin web design</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Apr 2010 22:09:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=3949#comment-1271709</guid>
		<description>so is flash still bad for seo ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>so is flash still bad for seo ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: austin web design</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/5-reasons-not-to-use-flash/3949/comment-page-1/#comment-1241012</link>
		<dc:creator>austin web design</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Apr 2010 17:09:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=3949#comment-1241012</guid>
		<description>so is flash still bad for seo ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>so is flash still bad for seo ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roger</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/5-reasons-not-to-use-flash/3949/comment-page-1/#comment-1101786</link>
		<dc:creator>Roger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 00:18:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=3949#comment-1101786</guid>
		<description>Use flash at your own peril, while it may possible to get flash  mostly accessible and SE friendly, generally a non flash site will always preform better in the long term.

The worst problem with flash is that it gives the sort of eye candy that the marketing people love - and they use it with gay abandon because the marketing people are more interested about how a thing looks rather that its functionality. Eg - flash intros.

Ease of editing, constant updates,  cross browser, multiple device (esp mobiles - the next frontier) html will win hands down every time, try making a pdf out of you flash page.

The 3 most imortant things on a web site are :- content content and content, followed by navigation so you can find the content, after this comes basic formating to make the content more readable, Then in position 5, 6 and 7 you have more content, even more content and then some funcitonality such as search and forms.

Eye candy is only for the owners of the website.
Flash looks impressive and can work extremely well but dollar for dollar a html site will always out preform flash except in a few special instances.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Use flash at your own peril, while it may possible to get flash  mostly accessible and SE friendly, generally a non flash site will always preform better in the long term.</p>
<p>The worst problem with flash is that it gives the sort of eye candy that the marketing people love &#8211; and they use it with gay abandon because the marketing people are more interested about how a thing looks rather that its functionality. Eg &#8211; flash intros.</p>
<p>Ease of editing, constant updates,  cross browser, multiple device (esp mobiles &#8211; the next frontier) html will win hands down every time, try making a pdf out of you flash page.</p>
<p>The 3 most imortant things on a web site are :- content content and content, followed by navigation so you can find the content, after this comes basic formating to make the content more readable, Then in position 5, 6 and 7 you have more content, even more content and then some funcitonality such as search and forms.</p>
<p>Eye candy is only for the owners of the website.<br />
Flash looks impressive and can work extremely well but dollar for dollar a html site will always out preform flash except in a few special instances.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/5-reasons-not-to-use-flash/3949/comment-page-1/#comment-1100075</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 10:15:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=3949#comment-1100075</guid>
		<description>I personally think Flash has a time and a place in web design.  I think making pieces for a web site in flash can work nicely, as long as there are alternatives coded into the site that allow for those who cannot see flash.

Who can&#039;t see flash?  More people than many understand.  Many people surf the net at work, and many more workplaces will block flash content from coming in.  Mostly to keep bandwidth usage (Youtube is an example) down as well as prevent possible openings for viruses.

I am not a fan of Flash.  I think it&#039;s nice for a display kind of site where you do not need to change the content regularly and for some embedded applications using Flex.  I would not make a blog in Flash, nor a news site, or anything.

When push comes to shove, you have to not think of the designers and techies who can easily learn and use a site, but the average person who gets lost easily, and does not have patience for a loader bar.

I prefer trying to show great design without using flash.  Great usability, imaginative thinking, and ease of use.  That&#039;s just me.

I also think with the widespread use of mobile devices now to view the internet, one needs to think deeply about how they build their sites, because most mobile devices cannot view Flash.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I personally think Flash has a time and a place in web design.  I think making pieces for a web site in flash can work nicely, as long as there are alternatives coded into the site that allow for those who cannot see flash.</p>
<p>Who can&#8217;t see flash?  More people than many understand.  Many people surf the net at work, and many more workplaces will block flash content from coming in.  Mostly to keep bandwidth usage (Youtube is an example) down as well as prevent possible openings for viruses.</p>
<p>I am not a fan of Flash.  I think it&#8217;s nice for a display kind of site where you do not need to change the content regularly and for some embedded applications using Flex.  I would not make a blog in Flash, nor a news site, or anything.</p>
<p>When push comes to shove, you have to not think of the designers and techies who can easily learn and use a site, but the average person who gets lost easily, and does not have patience for a loader bar.</p>
<p>I prefer trying to show great design without using flash.  Great usability, imaginative thinking, and ease of use.  That&#8217;s just me.</p>
<p>I also think with the widespread use of mobile devices now to view the internet, one needs to think deeply about how they build their sites, because most mobile devices cannot view Flash.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elijah Lucian</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/5-reasons-not-to-use-flash/3949/comment-page-1/#comment-1092345</link>
		<dc:creator>Elijah Lucian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2009 15:09:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=3949#comment-1092345</guid>
		<description>i hope you stay broke. 

if you wont cater to your clients needs and are too lazy to learn a simple program.. then nevermind you. stop posting useless articles.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i hope you stay broke. </p>
<p>if you wont cater to your clients needs and are too lazy to learn a simple program.. then nevermind you. stop posting useless articles.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil Roberts</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/5-reasons-not-to-use-flash/3949/comment-page-1/#comment-1084015</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil Roberts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 02:12:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=3949#comment-1084015</guid>
		<description>Just to let you all know this guy is just trying to shake the tree so that he can get hits to his website. This is just an old SEO trick. Nobody in their right mind would ever post an article so blatantly ridiculous without having an ulterior motive.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just to let you all know this guy is just trying to shake the tree so that he can get hits to his website. This is just an old SEO trick. Nobody in their right mind would ever post an article so blatantly ridiculous without having an ulterior motive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: paul</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/5-reasons-not-to-use-flash/3949/comment-page-1/#comment-1084014</link>
		<dc:creator>paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 02:03:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=3949#comment-1084014</guid>
		<description>Wow, I can&#039;t believe that someone would actually post such a careless and ignorant article. Mr. Baker obviously knows so very little about Flash to be so completely incorrect about this subject. If you don&#039;t know what you’re talking about keep your mouth shut.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, I can&#8217;t believe that someone would actually post such a careless and ignorant article. Mr. Baker obviously knows so very little about Flash to be so completely incorrect about this subject. If you don&#8217;t know what you’re talking about keep your mouth shut.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Brown</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/5-reasons-not-to-use-flash/3949/comment-page-1/#comment-1076024</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Brown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 10:05:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=3949#comment-1076024</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t mind keeping up with new technology. I don&#039;t mind having to do a ton of work to get accessibility to work properly. However, aside from videos, I can&#039;t see any real need for Flash on the internet.

I&#039;d love to see an example of a Flash site which couldn&#039;t more easily be done in W3C standard technologies (ie not requiring a plugin) and whic performs any kind of decent purpose on the web.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t mind keeping up with new technology. I don&#8217;t mind having to do a ton of work to get accessibility to work properly. However, aside from videos, I can&#8217;t see any real need for Flash on the internet.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d love to see an example of a Flash site which couldn&#8217;t more easily be done in W3C standard technologies (ie not requiring a plugin) and whic performs any kind of decent purpose on the web.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jimi</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/5-reasons-not-to-use-flash/3949/comment-page-1/#comment-1038557</link>
		<dc:creator>jimi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 12:24:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=3949#comment-1038557</guid>
		<description>hehe, is so funny to see all those old fashioned HTML - AJAX lovers defend their obsolete tecnologies... Have any one of you taken a look at FLEX 3??? It makes ajax an old thing, as it uses XML, Strong object oriented programation and a View-Model-Controller system that really puts WEB developing where it should&#039;ve been. Finally, the real software engineers can develop professionally. New times come for the real developers!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hehe, is so funny to see all those old fashioned HTML &#8211; AJAX lovers defend their obsolete tecnologies&#8230; Have any one of you taken a look at FLEX 3??? It makes ajax an old thing, as it uses XML, Strong object oriented programation and a View-Model-Controller system that really puts WEB developing where it should&#8217;ve been. Finally, the real software engineers can develop professionally. New times come for the real developers!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Gates is Evil</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/5-reasons-not-to-use-flash/3949/comment-page-1/#comment-1004517</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Gates is Evil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 11:19:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=3949#comment-1004517</guid>
		<description>Internet Explorer sucks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Internet Explorer sucks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

