<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: LinkExaminer: SEO Friendly Link Scanning&#160;Utility</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.searchenginejournal.com/linkexaminer-seo-friendly-link-scanning-utility/13380/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/linkexaminer-seo-friendly-link-scanning-utility/13380/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 17:43:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kruse Internet Services</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/linkexaminer-seo-friendly-link-scanning-utility/13380/comment-page-1/#comment-1123007</link>
		<dc:creator>Kruse Internet Services</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 18:34:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=13380#comment-1123007</guid>
		<description>Lots of designers get rich by simply not bothering with SEO considerations at all. I&#039;ve recently had to break the news to yet another enquirer that her Flash site, all one long, long movie, can&#039;t be properly optimised and will remain largely invisible to the engines unless we break it down into individual shorts on separate pages, costing, well, rather a lot. Perhaps not surprisingly there are no audible or visible signs of contrition from the designer. 

BB</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lots of designers get rich by simply not bothering with SEO considerations at all. I&#8217;ve recently had to break the news to yet another enquirer that her Flash site, all one long, long movie, can&#8217;t be properly optimised and will remain largely invisible to the engines unless we break it down into individual shorts on separate pages, costing, well, rather a lot. Perhaps not surprisingly there are no audible or visible signs of contrition from the designer. </p>
<p>BB</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Business Management</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/linkexaminer-seo-friendly-link-scanning-utility/13380/comment-page-1/#comment-1122840</link>
		<dc:creator>Business Management</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 09:00:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=13380#comment-1122840</guid>
		<description>My comment would be that Creating a website design that is appealing, while also search engine friendly, is one of the hardest parts about SEO web design. After discussing SEO strategy with a potential new client, the business owner gets cold feet. Considering today&#039;s economic uncertainty, entering into a contract to pay for costly search engine optimization services can be a daunting commitment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My comment would be that Creating a website design that is appealing, while also search engine friendly, is one of the hardest parts about SEO web design. After discussing SEO strategy with a potential new client, the business owner gets cold feet. Considering today&#8217;s economic uncertainty, entering into a contract to pay for costly search engine optimization services can be a daunting commitment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Philipp</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/linkexaminer-seo-friendly-link-scanning-utility/13380/comment-page-1/#comment-1122476</link>
		<dc:creator>Philipp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 08:21:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=13380#comment-1122476</guid>
		<description>The CSV export is not really helpful since it doesn&#039;t state what pages those links are placed on. the html export would be better, but with a size of 250MB it&#039;s simply too large for my browser to handle... i see the tool&#039;s potential but can&#039;t really use it in an easy way</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The CSV export is not really helpful since it doesn&#8217;t state what pages those links are placed on. the html export would be better, but with a size of 250MB it&#8217;s simply too large for my browser to handle&#8230; i see the tool&#8217;s potential but can&#8217;t really use it in an easy way</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kruse Internet Services</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/linkexaminer-seo-friendly-link-scanning-utility/13380/comment-page-1/#comment-1117841</link>
		<dc:creator>Kruse Internet Services</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 16:01:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=13380#comment-1117841</guid>
		<description>Your evidence?

BB</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your evidence?</p>
<p>BB</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erin</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/linkexaminer-seo-friendly-link-scanning-utility/13380/comment-page-1/#comment-1117800</link>
		<dc:creator>Erin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 13:34:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=13380#comment-1117800</guid>
		<description>This link checker caused an denial of service attack on my sites. Luckily I ran it on a Sunday night. Beware!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This link checker caused an denial of service attack on my sites. Luckily I ran it on a Sunday night. Beware!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kruse Internet Services</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/linkexaminer-seo-friendly-link-scanning-utility/13380/comment-page-1/#comment-1116473</link>
		<dc:creator>Kruse Internet Services</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 00:13:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=13380#comment-1116473</guid>
		<description>For free, wonderful, and very good if it were paid.

BB</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For free, wonderful, and very good if it were paid.</p>
<p>BB</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Dunlap</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/linkexaminer-seo-friendly-link-scanning-utility/13380/comment-page-1/#comment-1116299</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Dunlap</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 17:08:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=13380#comment-1116299</guid>
		<description>Good stuff. I&#039;ve got a lot of work to do... I like how it shows your meta-keywords. I see I need to add meta-keywords to my blogs tag pages</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good stuff. I&#8217;ve got a lot of work to do&#8230; I like how it shows your meta-keywords. I see I need to add meta-keywords to my blogs tag pages</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Wilton</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/linkexaminer-seo-friendly-link-scanning-utility/13380/comment-page-1/#comment-1116242</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Wilton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 15:20:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=13380#comment-1116242</guid>
		<description>Ann,

Happy to hear that you liked the tool.  I was tipped off to it a few months back and have used it regularly during site audits ever since.  I&#039;ve only run into a few issues with it and all them seem to have stemmed from problems on the site directly and not the tool itself.  Thanks for the mention!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ann,</p>
<p>Happy to hear that you liked the tool.  I was tipped off to it a few months back and have used it regularly during site audits ever since.  I&#8217;ve only run into a few issues with it and all them seem to have stemmed from problems on the site directly and not the tool itself.  Thanks for the mention!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pewter Art</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/linkexaminer-seo-friendly-link-scanning-utility/13380/comment-page-1/#comment-1116111</link>
		<dc:creator>Pewter Art</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 10:34:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=13380#comment-1116111</guid>
		<description>Hi Ann,

Thanks for the introduction of such great tool.  Much easier to use then the Xenu tool.  

j</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Ann,</p>
<p>Thanks for the introduction of such great tool.  Much easier to use then the Xenu tool.  </p>
<p>j</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dean Cruddace</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/linkexaminer-seo-friendly-link-scanning-utility/13380/comment-page-1/#comment-1116070</link>
		<dc:creator>Dean Cruddace</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 09:17:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=13380#comment-1116070</guid>
		<description>Downloaded the tool and ran it, i did have a few errors there and managed to sort them out within 10 minutes, without this tool i would never have noticed them! Thanks for that Ann, i will refer to this tool at least once a month on all sites, great find.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Downloaded the tool and ran it, i did have a few errors there and managed to sort them out within 10 minutes, without this tool i would never have noticed them! Thanks for that Ann, i will refer to this tool at least once a month on all sites, great find.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

