Comments on: Introducing SearchSalad: A Healthy Way to Search

By: John

John — Thu, 10 Jan 2008 13:33:33 +0000

I agree, I think they are in the infancy. However, I have had a playaround with the other aspects of the site and the customisation and addition of non search sites is a good idea… they just need to get it slick!
Also it needs speeding up, I think they will get their in the end…

By: Maciej Galecki

Maciej Galecki — Mon, 31 Dec 2007 13:29:21 +0000

I agree to Phil – it doesn’t really improve the functionality… This kind of added value is doubtful in my opinion. Btw, what if Google and other search engines start to reject data requests? I don’t think it’s a good solution in long term.

By: Small Business Marketing

Small Business Marketing — Sun, 30 Dec 2007 01:52:43 +0000

If it helps to filter the information then it makes sense. It appears to be just regurgitating information without doing any specific filtering.

By: Phil Bradley

Phil Bradley — Sat, 29 Dec 2007 21:38:37 +0000

You are having a laugh arn’t you? This type of search engine went out with the ark. It’s the most basic of all the types of meta search engine and it really adds absolutely nothing of interest to a searcher. I did laugh though – the name is throwing up totally inappropriate Google ads. The page title of the engine really says everything and smacks of desperation.

By: Affiliate Marketing Guide

Affiliate Marketing Guide — Sat, 29 Dec 2007 13:43:18 +0000

Hi,
I have had a look at search salad.

It looks quite good
Really handy for

1. Keeping an eye on your SERP position over a wide range of search engines

2. Niche and keyword research

Thanks for the heads up