<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Search Index Booms to 8&#160;Billion</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.searchenginejournal.com/google-search-index-booms-to-8-billion/1046/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/google-search-index-booms-to-8-billion/1046/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 14:42:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: p&#111;k&#101;r</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/google-search-index-booms-to-8-billion/1046/comment-page-1/#comment-33740</link>
		<dc:creator>p&#111;k&#101;r</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Jan 2005 06:17:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=1046#comment-33740</guid>
		<description>Thank you for the great web site - a true resource, and one many people clearly enjoy</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for the great web site &#8211; a true resource, and one many people clearly enjoy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dark Poems - SorrowMan</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/google-search-index-booms-to-8-billion/1046/comment-page-1/#comment-8289</link>
		<dc:creator>Dark Poems - SorrowMan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Nov 2004 11:37:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=1046#comment-8289</guid>
		<description>There are now huge piles of duplicated pages and most likely always will be, sadly :/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are now huge piles of duplicated pages and most likely always will be, sadly :/</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dilip Samuel</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/google-search-index-booms-to-8-billion/1046/comment-page-1/#comment-8282</link>
		<dc:creator>Dilip Samuel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Nov 2004 08:40:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=1046#comment-8282</guid>
		<description>Go by the quality of the index, not by the numbers. I can darn well say that a huge number of pages with duplicate content still exist in Google, especially the ones like Amazon APIs and other web services-enabled pages. It would be worth the wait to see whether Google finds a way to exhibit something like this: ...billion unique pages in the index.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Go by the quality of the index, not by the numbers. I can darn well say that a huge number of pages with duplicate content still exist in Google, especially the ones like Amazon APIs and other web services-enabled pages. It would be worth the wait to see whether Google finds a way to exhibit something like this: &#8230;billion unique pages in the index.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SorrowMan - Dark Sad Poems</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/google-search-index-booms-to-8-billion/1046/comment-page-1/#comment-8279</link>
		<dc:creator>SorrowMan - Dark Sad Poems</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Nov 2004 07:43:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=1046#comment-8279</guid>
		<description>Ah, works finally. Haven&#039;t been THAT big surprise really unless you have been living eyes closed :)

Already long time certain searches were showing way over 4 billion pages, search for word THE gave about 6 Billion pages as I earlier pointed in comment for www.searchenginejournal.com/index.php?p=988 (Google Flaws and Fixes) article.

Page amount have been going up quite while but they didn&#039;t update static number on front page where it claimed that famous +4 Billion pages.

In reality this update &quot;only&quot; brought in less than 2 billion pages from what were indexed two weeks ago, still nice big boost in index size, but no way near doubling indexed page count :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah, works finally. Haven&#8217;t been THAT big surprise really unless you have been living eyes closed :)</p>
<p>Already long time certain searches were showing way over 4 billion pages, search for word THE gave about 6 Billion pages as I earlier pointed in comment for <a href="http://www.searchenginejournal.com/index.php?p=988" rel="nofollow">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/index.php?p=988</a> (Google Flaws and Fixes) article.</p>
<p>Page amount have been going up quite while but they didn&#8217;t update static number on front page where it claimed that famous +4 Billion pages.</p>
<p>In reality this update &#8220;only&#8221; brought in less than 2 billion pages from what were indexed two weeks ago, still nice big boost in index size, but no way near doubling indexed page count :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SorrowMan - Dark Sad Poems</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/google-search-index-booms-to-8-billion/1046/comment-page-1/#comment-8276</link>
		<dc:creator>SorrowMan - Dark Sad Poems</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Nov 2004 07:41:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=1046#comment-8276</guid>
		<description>hmm, is it just me or is this comment leaving system broken, sorry for this test but seems I can&#039;t post a comment right now for some reason</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hmm, is it just me or is this comment leaving system broken, sorry for this test but seems I can&#8217;t post a comment right now for some reason</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

