<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Bans BMW for Search&#160;Spamming</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.searchenginejournal.com/bmw-booted-from-google-for-spamming/2886/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/bmw-booted-from-google-for-spamming/2886/</link>
	<description>Latest Search Engine News from the Search Engine Journal</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 22:31:24 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Your Brand Size Matters with Big Site SEO - Why Big is the new Blackhat - Intent, Extent, and Semantics - Stuntdubl - SEO Consultant</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/bmw-booted-from-google-for-spamming/2886/comment-page-1/#comment-1078801</link>
		<dc:creator>Your Brand Size Matters with Big Site SEO - Why Big is the new Blackhat - Intent, Extent, and Semantics - Stuntdubl - SEO Consultant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2008 20:48:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=2886#comment-1078801</guid>
		<description>[...] post in the archives, and thought it was worth tossing up since I&#8217;ve been MIA quite a while. BMW was out of the index for less than a week. Colgate has pushed the envelope hard. Wordpress made a [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] post in the archives, and thought it was worth tossing up since I&#8217;ve been MIA quite a while. BMW was out of the index for less than a week. Colgate has pushed the envelope hard. Wordpress made a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jellyfish &#187; Blog Archive &#187; How Google Profits from Irrelevance</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/bmw-booted-from-google-for-spamming/2886/comment-page-1/#comment-102075</link>
		<dc:creator>Jellyfish &#187; Blog Archive &#187; How Google Profits from Irrelevance</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 May 2006 20:48:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=2886#comment-102075</guid>
		<description>[...] The article cites estimates that &#8220;robot-generated spam consists of anywhere between one-fifth and one-third of the Google index&#8221; and indicates that Google is &#8220;engaged in an arms race with search engine optimizers.&#8221; But I wonder, is this web spam actually bad for Google? And are Google (and Yahoo! for that matter) really out to get the SEO industry (like posts here and here indicate)? Do they really want to destroy SEO as a whole or even the worst kinds of SEO like web spam? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The article cites estimates that &#8220;robot-generated spam consists of anywhere between one-fifth and one-third of the Google index&#8221; and indicates that Google is &#8220;engaged in an arms race with search engine optimizers.&#8221; But I wonder, is this web spam actually bad for Google? And are Google (and Yahoo! for that matter) really out to get the SEO industry (like posts here and here indicate)? Do they really want to destroy SEO as a whole or even the worst kinds of SEO like web spam? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pat Mcgee</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/bmw-booted-from-google-for-spamming/2886/comment-page-1/#comment-61753</link>
		<dc:creator>Pat Mcgee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2006 15:54:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=2886#comment-61753</guid>
		<description>Saying that cloaking is ethical is like saying that knives are ethical. It depends how you use them. But they should have known it could very easily get them banned, and for that they are just stupid. Ethics don&#039;t apply.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Saying that cloaking is ethical is like saying that knives are ethical. It depends how you use them. But they should have known it could very easily get them banned, and for that they are just stupid. Ethics don&#8217;t apply.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nicholas Gillard-Byers</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/bmw-booted-from-google-for-spamming/2886/comment-page-1/#comment-61748</link>
		<dc:creator>Nicholas Gillard-Byers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2006 15:25:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=2886#comment-61748</guid>
		<description>Even as an atheist, I&#039;m pretty sure the &quot;master rule&quot; of the Ten Commandments would be &quot;I am the Lord thy God&quot; or whatever particular variation people prefer.  An especially appropriate commandment given Google&#039;s move here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even as an atheist, I&#8217;m pretty sure the &#8220;master rule&#8221; of the Ten Commandments would be &#8220;I am the Lord thy God&#8221; or whatever particular variation people prefer.  An especially appropriate commandment given Google&#8217;s move here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mikey</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/bmw-booted-from-google-for-spamming/2886/comment-page-1/#comment-61610</link>
		<dc:creator>Mikey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2006 19:51:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=2886#comment-61610</guid>
		<description>I know of alot of big UK companies spamming/cloaking too. The list is pretty big and Google has never done anything about them. Take a look at: www.thomascook.com, www.Boots.com, www.virgincosmetics.com, www.mytravel.com, www.bradford-bingley.co.uk, www.thewhitecompany.co.uk, etc. The list goes on. They&#039;re all hiding content. Check Google&#039;s cache for any of those homepages, select &#039;cached text&#039; and you&#039;ll see exactly what I mean. They&#039;re all the work of an seo agency called Ambergreen who really should be banned right away if Google has any sense.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know of alot of big UK companies spamming/cloaking too. The list is pretty big and Google has never done anything about them. Take a look at: <a href="http://www.thomascook.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.thomascook.com</a>, <a href="http://www.Boots.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.Boots.com</a>, <a href="http://www.virgincosmetics.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.virgincosmetics.com</a>, <a href="http://www.mytravel.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.mytravel.com</a>, <a href="http://www.bradford-bingley.co.uk" rel="nofollow">http://www.bradford-bingley.co.uk</a>, <a href="http://www.thewhitecompany.co.uk" rel="nofollow">http://www.thewhitecompany.co.uk</a>, etc. The list goes on. They&#8217;re all hiding content. Check Google&#8217;s cache for any of those homepages, select &#8216;cached text&#8217; and you&#8217;ll see exactly what I mean. They&#8217;re all the work of an seo agency called Ambergreen who really should be banned right away if Google has any sense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SEO-3.com &#187;  Non-Geek SEO Tips&#8230; - Google Bans BMW for Search Spamming&#160;</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/bmw-booted-from-google-for-spamming/2886/comment-page-1/#comment-62393</link>
		<dc:creator>SEO-3.com &#187;  Non-Geek SEO Tips&#8230; - Google Bans BMW for Search Spamming&#160;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 19:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=2886#comment-62393</guid>
		<description>[...] Spamming&#160; 	Filed under: SEO &#8212; jdunn @ 4:09 am  	 	 	 		&lt;a rel=&quot;nofollow&quot; href=&quot;http://www.searchenginejournal.com/index.php?p=2886&quot;&gt;Google Bans BMW for Search Spamming&#160;&lt;/a&gt; Search Engine Journal&#160;-&#160;Feb 06  6:53 AM G [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Spamming&nbsp;</p>
<p> 	Filed under: SEO &#8212; jdunn @ 4:09 am </p>
<p> 		<a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.searchenginejournal.com/index.php?p=2886">Google Bans BMW for Search Spamming&nbsp;</a> Search Engine Journal&nbsp;-&nbsp;Feb 06  6:53 AM G [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
