<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is Backlink Age an Important SEO&#160;Factor?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.searchenginejournal.com/backlink-age-seo-factor/9943/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/backlink-age-seo-factor/9943/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 09:28:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Klaus Hanemann</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/backlink-age-seo-factor/9943/comment-page-1/#comment-1271711</link>
		<dc:creator>Klaus Hanemann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Apr 2010 14:29:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=9943#comment-1271711</guid>
		<description>Short and to the basics - liked that :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Short and to the basics &#8211; liked that :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Klaus Hanemann</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/backlink-age-seo-factor/9943/comment-page-1/#comment-1249729</link>
		<dc:creator>Klaus Hanemann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Apr 2010 09:29:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=9943#comment-1249729</guid>
		<description>Short and to the basics - liked that :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Short and to the basics &#8211; liked that :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/backlink-age-seo-factor/9943/comment-page-1/#comment-1174438</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2010 08:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=9943#comment-1174438</guid>
		<description>while age is a means to help spam, it really isn&#039;t the greatest indicator of what page should rank better.  Hopefully, in the near future google will search engines will be able to develop more effective ways of ranking sites.

The age factor of domains and links seems to limit the ability of creative and useful new pages to shine through in the search engines and also gives alot of control to old money type websites.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>while age is a means to help spam, it really isn&#8217;t the greatest indicator of what page should rank better.  Hopefully, in the near future google will search engines will be able to develop more effective ways of ranking sites.</p>
<p>The age factor of domains and links seems to limit the ability of creative and useful new pages to shine through in the search engines and also gives alot of control to old money type websites.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shane</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/backlink-age-seo-factor/9943/comment-page-1/#comment-1173038</link>
		<dc:creator>Shane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Jan 2010 06:26:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=9943#comment-1173038</guid>
		<description>I agree, the age factor cannot be ignored--great insight! That is one of the reasons I believe social media cannot replace SEO. With link age, Google has a way of truly  gauging a website&#039;s popularity over a longer period of time (unlike a news flash, which might be worthy for a day or so). With social media it&#039;s impossible to do that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree, the age factor cannot be ignored&#8211;great insight! That is one of the reasons I believe social media cannot replace SEO. With link age, Google has a way of truly  gauging a website&#8217;s popularity over a longer period of time (unlike a news flash, which might be worthy for a day or so). With social media it&#8217;s impossible to do that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Timewarp</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/backlink-age-seo-factor/9943/comment-page-1/#comment-1099342</link>
		<dc:creator>Timewarp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 19:36:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=9943#comment-1099342</guid>
		<description>Good post, yahoo also seems to really like aged back links. I would say they are more important then an aged domain that doesn&#039;t have backlinks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good post, yahoo also seems to really like aged back links. I would say they are more important then an aged domain that doesn&#8217;t have backlinks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dakshin</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/backlink-age-seo-factor/9943/comment-page-1/#comment-1099011</link>
		<dc:creator>Dakshin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2009 02:46:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=9943#comment-1099011</guid>
		<description>Yes, I believe in the age of the link, it is similar that google considers the domain age and expire date.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, I believe in the age of the link, it is similar that google considers the domain age and expire date.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/backlink-age-seo-factor/9943/comment-page-1/#comment-1098892</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 02:19:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=9943#comment-1098892</guid>
		<description>In my own experience, I have noticed that gaining backlinks from PR4-8 and using anchor text, even on unrelated sites, will dramatically boost your ranking.  They have been maintaining for awhile now, but again, this is for local search terms/less competitive search terms.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In my own experience, I have noticed that gaining backlinks from PR4-8 and using anchor text, even on unrelated sites, will dramatically boost your ranking.  They have been maintaining for awhile now, but again, this is for local search terms/less competitive search terms.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Mann</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/backlink-age-seo-factor/9943/comment-page-1/#comment-1098825</link>
		<dc:creator>James Mann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 08:16:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=9943#comment-1098825</guid>
		<description>Something that has always puzzled me about SEO, is what defines the amount of keywords you can use on any one page? how much is considered spamming?  and how does Google know when someone is placing text, the same colour as the background?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Something that has always puzzled me about SEO, is what defines the amount of keywords you can use on any one page? how much is considered spamming?  and how does Google know when someone is placing text, the same colour as the background?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Martinez</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/backlink-age-seo-factor/9943/comment-page-1/#comment-1098796</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Martinez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 21:59:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=9943#comment-1098796</guid>
		<description>Nice recap of what is (and isn&#039;t) known on this topic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice recap of what is (and isn&#8217;t) known on this topic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Betamale</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/backlink-age-seo-factor/9943/comment-page-1/#comment-1098795</link>
		<dc:creator>Betamale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 21:08:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=9943#comment-1098795</guid>
		<description>So to that comment above by Nina,

are you saying that link age is more important than link freshness?  I always see both being discussed on SEO blogs but is there a definitive answer?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So to that comment above by Nina,</p>
<p>are you saying that link age is more important than link freshness?  I always see both being discussed on SEO blogs but is there a definitive answer?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

