How Google, Yahoo & Ask.com Treat the No Follow Link Attribute

SMS Text

There seems to be a common misconception in the webmaster and search engine marketing field that inbound links which use the ‘no follow’ attribute have no value to the site which they point towards.

Earlier in the week, Raj Dash commented in a post on Exposing the Invisible Web to Search Engines that in addition to bookmarking and social news sharing, securing links from authority sites such as Wikipedia can help search engines discover sites which they may not have been able to find.

A reader responded in a comment that this is false:

Links from Wikipedia will not allow you pages to be seen by search engines, because Wikipedia recently added rel=”nofollow” to all of there external links.

Instead of challenging the reader to an argument on No Follow, I thought that for once and for all, the law needs to be laid down as to how search engines treat the no follow attribute in terms of linking and discovery.

What better way to do so than to ask the search engines themselves? So I wrote Google’s Adam Lasnik (Matt’s on vacation), Yahoo’s Director of Search Tim Mayer and the Ask.com Search Team to get the lowdown on No Follow directly from the source.

So, here are the basic No Follow questions and answers, from Google, Ask.com (a surprising response) and Yahoo.

1. How does your search engine treat the No Follow attribute?

  • Google : The Googlebot does not follow that link.
  • Yahoo : If we find a link we make it available to our algorithms to find new content, whether it has a ‘no follow’ attribute or not. However, if the ‘no follow’ attribute is present, it means that no attribution is given to the target from the source of the link.
  • Ask.com : We have never officially supported No Follow, so your questions don’t apply to our crawler/ranking.

2. If a site has no web citations and only has one link pointing to it, and that link is from a Wikipedia entry, would your search engine find that site and index it even though the link uses a No Follow attribute?

  • Yahoo : Yes, the link is available to our crawlers for finding the target. Then the target will be crawled and indexed based on our algorithms.
  • Google : Assuming that link is still no-followed per Wikipedia’s current practice, we will not find much less index that page (remember, this is page, not site related; if links to other pages on that site are not no-followed, we will see and potentially index those pages).

    On a related note, though, and echoing Matt’s earlier sentiments… we hope and expect that more and more sites — including Wikipedia — will adopt a less-absolute approach to no-follow… expiring no-follows, not applying no-follows to trusted contributors, and so on.

3. Is there any quality given to sites which attract No Follow links from authority sites, besides the lack of the passing of PageRank, Link Authority or “Search Juice”?

  • Google : Since the Googlebot does not follow no-follow links, this isn’t really an issue.
  • Yahoo : As promised in the semantics for the ‘no follow’ tag, the anchor text and attribution will not be carried over to the target of a ‘no follow’ link.

No Follow Search Engines

In conclusion, the commenter was correct about links to pages from Wikipedia some search engines, specifically Google, but Yahoo and Ask.com both not only follow No Follow, but also make those sites available to their algorithm. Therefore, even links with the No Follow attribute do have value; especially in the counting, but not always authoritative measurement, of backlinks.

No Follow does not mean that search engines do not see the pages which No Follow attributed links point to, it means in some cases (not Ask.com) link value nor referral attribution is given.

Loren Baker
Loren Baker is the Founder of SEJ, an Advisor at Alpha Brand Media and runs Foundation Digital, a digital marketing strategy & development agency.
Loren Baker
Get the latest news from Search Engine Journal!
We value your privacy! See our policy here.
  • Great job, thanks!

    Didn’t you ask MSN or didn’t you expect that they can remember that they officially support the rel-nofollow microformat since 2005?

  • Hey Loren, thanks for looking into this. It confirms my suspicion. What better way to prove something?!

  • Nice job, surprised you got such a concrete answer from them. But it raises one issue – people could use wikipedia to put in spam pages and although it doesn’t get any credit to those sites, it still helps it get indexed by Yahoo and Ask..hmm I predict a surge in spam on Wikipedia.

  • Joe Mulloy

    “but Yahoo and Ask.com both not only follow No Follow, but also make those sites available to their algorithm.”

    This has to be one of the most confusing thing I’ve ever read.

    Was it supposed to be “both not only NOT follow No Follow, but…”

    The wording makes it seem like they do adhere to No Follow

  • Wow! Great information, thank you very much for contacting the big guys. Bookmarking this, I will most likely be referencing this in my own article soon.

    Mark

  • Yahoo has the best attitude here. Google just doesn’t “follow” the link, but if it’s present on any other page, it’ll crawl the page. That’s stupid, because it does nothing, all you need is one link to defeat every nofollow’ed reference. Unless Google hid if they consider the link for PR purposes, unlike Yahoo, who were explicit on their answers about this.

    A link is a link is a link, better have it even if it’s nofollow. I would rather hit Digg’s frontpage with nofollow than getting thousands of links from untrusted, PR 1 pages.

  • I’ve touted what Lasnik was saying for a while now but I have to ask, why in the heck is it still including in the backlink results?

  • Thanks for clearing this up Loren, but as Sebastian said, any reason why you didn’t ask MSN?

  • Your findings align with an experiment I conducted a few months ago:

    http://www.wagerank.com/2007/the-nofollow-experiment/

  • Well done on that interview. At least I feel I have a clearer idea on how various search engines, particular Google index my sites.

  • Pinged MSN Search for this information, but did not hear back in a timely fashion. I will retry and once we hear back from them, will update.

  • Whenever I think of rel-nofollow, I think of the requests by webmasters asking to have a way to link to a website, without transferring any value, because they were usually talking about a bad source. Thus, the purpose of no-follow, in much sense, is to keep from passing value to unwanted sites. I think this attribute is very limiting, and more attributes should be created.

    Specifically, I want a rel-paidlink attribute to identify links that have been purchased. This attribute, unlike the non-specific rel-nofollow attribute, can inform the crawler of the paid link status on the link, allowing the system crawling to determine what to do with that new information.

  • Google does follow “nofollows”, set up a page on your site with no interlinking within your site, point 10 “nofollows at it” wait 2 weeks, go back search in google, and it will be indexed.

  • Aftseo, is the page dynamically generated? Or static? I am assuming from the behavior you described that the page was a static object in a web accessible subdirectory, in which case it would be picked up.

  • Good Information about nofollow.

  • If I’m in the place of the search engines or wikipedia… I’ll stick with nofollow. It’ll be devastating on the system.

    However, that DOFollow thing that is getting popular (for blogs) might as well be good and be bad.

  • Loren.

    Whats the bottom line?

    Are we or are we not getting credits for these comments ?

    🙂

    Good work. Just a few hours before reading this post I added the plugin allowing links to be followed from my site. I figure reward the visitors and take my chances… for now.

  • Thank you for bringing clarity to an issue that has caused confusion for some time.

    I recently joined the “Do/I Follow” movement and have seen traffic increase to my blog accordingly. Hopefully, this move will translate to better link juice on the part of all participants.

  • Great Post. Just last week I posted an article on my blog titled I’ve Removed The ‘No Follow’ Tag from My Blog – You Should Too!.
    Take Care,
    Fred

  • Is there a possibility to put a nofollow for external links using HTaccess? I know this question is not related but I jst wanted to know and would appreciate a post on this. I have many sites linking to me, but I am not sure if my pages are getting crawled by the bots. Also is there a way to check HTaccess tags of other sites?

  • So, now that we know how the NOFOLLOW is treated by the bots, how are they (mis)treating the NOINDEX attribute?

  • Loren,

    Nice post on an undercovered topic!

  • I wrote this up in detail last year http://www.seo-blog.com/rel-nofollow.php and also included the results for MSN.

    – Michael

  • Hi

    Very nice post. Very much informative.
    Eagerly waiting to know how MSN reacts to it.

    Cheers
    Nirupam

  • I could swear i’ve seen Google reporting on links with “nofollow” for ours as well as our clients’ sites in their Webmaster Central link report.

  • Thanks for the article Loren, Great to get the whole picture in one clean package. Good job. Required reading for my team.

  • Loren, thanks so much for this! It’s exactly the info I was looking for. Consider yourself delicioused. Cheers!

  • Very much informative.

  • This is not good news for link exchange marketer. Do you think that if search engine will not index that URL then why link exchange expert will visit any blogs, social networking website or wiki site for link posting, if that is not useful. This will affect Page Hit also for that specific website if no buddy is posting any link or making comment on your post.

  • No-follow “inlinks” are displayed in Yahoo Site Explorer. so there is some recognition…

  • Loren

    @David, yes, as stated in the pice Yahoo follows links using the no follow attribute but does not pass value from the page which is linking to a specific site. So, of course the links show up in Site Explorer, but should not influence ranking.

  • If Yahoo and Ask follow them and index those sites, won’t Google then index them by finding the links on Yahoo and Ask? If that’s the case, then the nofollow attribute is useless with respect to indexing.

  • Wikipedia now adds the “nofollow” attribute to all external links. The reason given for this is to battle spam links, like those of blackhat search engine optimizers. The change is already active, as you can see by checking outgoing links on Wikipedia’s articles.

    Web Page

    Thank for the official response. Official is always good. Nice leg work Loren.

  • oopsa i meant to show the tag 😉

    a href=”http://www.website.com/page.html” rel=”nofollow”>Visit My Page

  • Allen makes a very good point. If Yahoo is following and indexing links despite the No Follow tags. These same links will be indexed by Google and MSN via a Yahoo spidering and the No Follow tag becomes a none issue.

    As long as one major search engine ignores No Follow tags, they are technically not working.

  • Good to see such a detailed post on nofollow.

  • Whats about the page rank of google if no follow link is there?

  • Mr. Baker, thank you for this article which [in part] clarifies the “no follow” tag’s role.

  • Great post! Thanks for the information. I have been more than a little confused as to how the whole no follow/do follow thing worked.

  • Loren, thanks for getting the SE’s on record for this.

  • Thank you for this article, really good stuff. Worth reading.

  • Thanks for the facts, wish I’d never seen nofollow.
    Hope to have a better time without such crazy solutions.

  • Good Post and great information- love it when its backed up with facts! -Not opinions.

    I like the “expiring no follow links” -concept -as will allow webmasters that are serious- to post-thinking long term…..

    Wiki had to try and stop abuse- so it made sense to go no follow – Someone should look at the traffic stats from no follow links (as isn’t that what you are really after- more traffic after all?)

  • Great article and thank you for taking the time to interview these authorities.

    I would like to see some test results displaying pages with no other links but those with no follow attributes…

    Also thanks for clearing up why you didn’t include MSN, I was wondering why they were not included also.

  • Great Research! i used this content on my website too if you don’t mind Loren. Plus one thing i want to tell is that GOOGLE does FOLLOW no-follow link. I have prove of it. I am analyzing a site links in google where i find a link to that site from a directory when i visit that directory ,interestingly its using NO FOLLOW tags.

    🙂

  • It would be really good, if you included Windows Live search with the comparison. Live search have much more search market share then Ask.

  • And ask.com wonders why no one takes them seriously …

  • what is the requirements for live.com for linking?

  • Somehow… I still have doubts. I always perceived Google to crawl but not credit the link love from a nofollow. So it may still help in the indexing but not helping in the ranking.

    I’ll test this with a page unknown the world and just link to it from a nofollow link.

  • You would be better using a site map program like this one: http://www. xml-sitemaps.com and it will automatically index the new page

    Getting indexed is not a challenge

  • Does a no follow tag keep the crawler on your site with the result of more pages being indexed or reindexed.
    Also does activating no follow help you achieve a higher pagerank, It seams that a site owner can put more links on thei site or blog without fear of being penalized for to many outgoing links, If in fact you are penalized. Just seams that those with the power have figured out how to keep those without from getting any.

  • If a web page needs to have a lot of outbound links, they can be affected to PR. In this case, no follows might be helpful! – I think.

  • The traffic I get from Yahoo and Ask is so minimal I don’t even bother wondering what their alog does.. G just buries all the rest of them

  • Google owns about 60% of the search engine market and continue to grow. Yahoo has good content such as news and their own information but google is the king of search engines

  • Nofollow attribute does not really apply to the other search engines. This attribute is simply part of Google’s plan against link spamming and PR manipulation.

  • Interesting article-I’ll admit I learned something about Ask. Wonder if they will ever come around full circle and accept the no follow?

  • I think this debate continues to prove that no link is a bad link – void of adult, non related sites, etc. I know many people who steer clear of linking with no-follow sites simply because of the no-follow. I’m still not completely convinced that, if it is an ‘authority’ site, Google completely discredits the link if it is tagged with a ‘nofollow’.

  • Reading through the article and subsequent comments, I think I am now safe in the knowledge that all my “find ‘nofollow’ blogs for comments” software rubbish has been pretty useless and can well and truly be confined to the recycle bin!

  • This is good article which I have been following.

    It can be abused- thats where the lack of no follow creates more work.

    Let me explain…..
    On my dog site: http://www.JustDogClothes.com/

    The competition has made 28 K links to it for the term of “dog clothes” – 99% of them are from blogs without the no follow- some of them in english- most in chinese (I believe most don’t require confirmation)

    (They have a number 1 ranking BTW)

    I am all for posts on blogs with relevent content(like this one) but when it gets abused like this- its possible for anybody to apply it to any market and you cant remove them from the top position (even with a complain to the big G)

    Comments?

  • @Paul from SEO Training Live – I have seen the same exact thing from an advertising company in CA. They have hundreds of links from dofollow blogs using only the anchor text: ‘internet marketing’ and rank rather well for the extremely competitive term. The worst part – they sell SEO. Is this the same tactic they use for their clients?
    I clicked through to a few and a couple were from a ‘business ethics’ blog – the irony.

  • Hi to the north carolina Graphic design -are you able to tell me the site? or tell me its rank- I want to look into it more….

    Paul

  • @Paul – Sure I would be happy to disclose more although a more private setting might ideal as opposed to a blog forum:) Feel free to e-mail me at jclark (at) andrusgroup.com. I just dropped the URL into Yahoo Site Explorer – 17,000 plus links most of which are from BS.

  • Nice report… Being in the business of marketing, advertising, and SEO, I can tell you that the best way to obtain a higher PR is through quality backlinks (obviously), however we have always maintained that even a nofollow link is better than no link at all…

  • Nice article – guess I need to go experiment a bit…

  • Even though Google doesn’t follow the links, they can still get you visitors. So don’t worry too much about it.

  • thank god for this article, I was getting suspicious after submitting my site to various directories, because not many backlinks are found when I do a search. I think the no follow attribute is just heinous

  • Hiya,
    Google can be slow in reconizing back links. Have you used this tool:

    http://www.marketleap.com/publinkpop/default.htm

    Shows more and is helpful

    Paul

  • Someone commented – No-follow “inlinks” are displayed in Yahoo Site Explorer. So there is some recognition…

    I have noticed this too with some Yahoo Answers I posted – which are nofollow links but seem to get some recognition in Yahoo. Whether this is because it is their own site, or whether it is because they still rate nofollow links to some degree, I’m not certain.

  • As this post approaches being 12 months old is the information still relevant today.
    or have there been dramatic changes in the past 10 months. Have Google, Yahoo or Ask changed their view on the “no-follow” tag

    Regards Shayne

  • Nice article – guess I need to go experiment a bit..

  • Thanks. I have spent the last week thinking about this and wondering whether to trawl my sites adding no follows to unimportant links. I maaaay still do this on the main sites, but I feel it is less urgent now.

  • The official claim is that links with the rel=nofollow attribute do not influence the search engine rankings of the target page. In addition to Google, Yahoo and MSN also support the rel=nofollow attribute.

    i think it helps indexing….

  • If everyone would moderate their comments the old fashioned way, one at a time and check the landing pages, this would not be a problem.

  • Only now I have come to fully understand what no-follow attribute really means.Until now I never paid attention to this is now I now I was wrong.
    I now use seo source for firefox to highlight nofollow links.
    Oh, and thanks alot!!!

  • Nice Post! I was looking for this information all over the internet.

  • Fantastic article, this is exactly the black and white answer we need.

  • I want to congratulate you on your work to explaining this follow – nofollow issue. I’ve searched literally hundreds of site only to find little information.Thanks man.

  • Thanks for the info. Very informative.

  • I have noticed tht G does index links fron no-follow sites. Now I understand.

    http://www.websiteplex.com

  • thank you

  • leif white

    HOW DO I GET SEARCH ENGINES TO NOT DISPLAY PREVIOUS SEARCHES. FOR INSTANCE IF I SEARCH FOR “AIR LINES” THE NEXT TIME I HIT “A” , THE WORD “AIR LINES” AUTOMATICLLY COMES UP. HOW DO I GET RID OF THAT?

  • no kidding? the no follow link is just plain evil.

  • thank you man

  • Do not worry too much about having your links in nofollow attribute. If you are writing good content, webmasters are more than happy to provide a link back. Focus should be placed on building great content.

  • I find this very interesting but how can you really tell if a website has a no follow attribute?

  • I have noticed tht G does index links fron no-follow sites. Now I understand.

  • thanks

  • thanked

  • thanks you.

  • thanks alot

  • Strange google still shows up as links on my external links page in webmasters

  • Is there any info about live.com and no follow?

  • Thx bro

  • Thx u bro.

  • Is there any info about live.com and no follow?

  • beatifull

  • foryou

  • good

  • good

  • Great information and certainly changes the ball park.

    Rich

  • thanks

  • thanks.

  • thankss.

  • thanksss.

  • thanks.
    ..

  • I am in the process of learning SEO techniques and just recently found out about “nofollow”. Glad to know that the comments I made on sites utilizing “nofollow” links would still have a benefit. I just wish more people used ASK.

  • I have noticed this too with some Yahoo Answers I posted – which are nofollow links but seem to get some recognition in Yahoo. Whether this is because it is their own site, or whether it is because they still rate nofollow links to some degree, I’m not certain.

  • thankss.

  • so so so nice

  • very nice

  • That’s nice to know. I always wondered why Yahoo recorded the nofollow links to one of my sites.

  • Thanks for your information, I have always had questions about the no follow rule and how the bots worked.

  • I have sites with more yahoo traffic than google traffic. So all does not necessarily have to end or start with google.

    yahoo loves blogs and will index blogs faster particularly if you throw them in the yahoo.dir and they are personal blogs.

    MSN loves blogs even more than yahoo ( recent trend ? ) and some of my blogs can get more traffic from MSN than Google.

    Look for the traffic people, its more important than how much G loves you ( and yes, they can be related but… Focus on the real reason for doing business )

  • Hi everyone!
    Thanx for the post!
    Probably smb can tell how Russian Yandex treat no-follow-links??????

  • Hi real great post I have wondered about this for a while and heard on a few occasions that nofollow links are still worth something, Anyways main reason I am posting is I am very interested in knowing if you ever got a response back from MSN

  • Great information on no follow link. My blog also has a post about no rel also! Check it out.

  • sesli chat panel paneli sohbet paneli sohbet sitesi speakyweb speaky chat odalari sesli chat panel paneli sohbet paneli sohbet sitesi speakyweb speaky chat odalari sesli chat panel paneli sohbet paneli sohbet sitesi speakyweb speaky chat odalari sesli chat panel paneli sohbet paneli sohbet sitesi http://www.sohbetdizayn.com http://www.seslichatpanel.com http://www.seslideyiz.net

  • Any chance of getting an update on this? I’m curious to see if the search engines have changed their feelings on “no follow” since this was first posted almost 2 years ago.

  • hello

  • To answer your question

    Jim on Jan 12, 2009 at 2:49 pm

    Any chance of getting an update on this? I’m curious to see if the search engines have changed their feelings on “no follow” since this was first posted almost 2 years ago.

    Not that I have seen but I am still interested in MSN

  • seslichatpaneli seslipanel http://www.sonbaharim.com

  • ok man

  • hosting sites asp

  • Great article. i see the importance of the no-follow now. As from a professional SEO person a link is better than no link at all. Also I heard that sometimes google crawler will miss the no-follow and you will get credit.. SEO expert told me its like “a leaky condom” But who knows. That is what i have learned. I have realized getting links on pages that do not have the no-follow link have a huge impact on me. And definitly has grown my websites to what it is today.

    By the way……… great article….

  • hello jerry,
    i offer you to buy all my shares at 30$.
    it’s a real bargain. 20% below fair value.
    will you plase contact me immediately ?
    i would be very happy to make you richer.
    regards

  • sesli chat,sesli sohbet,sesli chat,sesli sohbet ,sesli chat ,sesli sohbet,sesli sohbet,birsesdeyiz,seslikankam,sesliyizibiz.net

  • It seems to me that ask.com traffic is neglible for many sites. Most people I speak to get very little traffic regardless of nofollow or not.Indexing of sites seems a little hit and miss also

  • Of course, this Selsi person who is spamming this website understands that this site itself implements a no-follow rule?

    Thank you for this article, it makes my job a little harder though.

  • seslichat,sesli sohbet

  • Wow, Great Article.

    I thought all SE’s treated nofollow the same. The thought didn’t even cross my mind that they didn’t.

  • seslichat,seslipanel,seslichatpanel,seslisohbet,Seslichat,Seslipanel,seslichat,seslipanel,seslichatpanel,seslisohbet,Seslichat,Seslipanel,seslichat,seslipanel,seslichatpanel,seslisohbet,Seslichat,Seslipanel,seslichat,seslipanel,seslichatpanel,seslisohbet,Seslichat,Seslipanel

  • Fine discuss on no-follow, bookmark it and I’ll read it tomorrow because it’s too late. Wikis dose a bad work. Why close itself within walls.

  • Well thanks for bringing this up i think google needs to go this way as well and be more open.

  • great summary of nofollow links, very useful

  • I don’t think google underestimates nofollow links, I have seen many guys ranking high with no-follow comments.

  • sesli sohbet sesli chat sohbet sesli arkadaslık kameralı chat goruntulu chat seslizurna

  • I think Google allows more for no follow than they let on. They don’t tell everything.

  • I wonder, does Google follow their own “FOLLOW” links on their blogs? In other words if I visit a blogspot.com blog and like it and then click their follow me link and add myself will Google find me?

  • Really good information. I just watched an online seminar that said differently, but I figured the nofollow links had to have some value. I mean comments from people are important.

  • think Google allows more for no follow than they let on. They don’t tell everything.

  • As long as one major search engine ignores No Follow tags, they are technically not working.

  • thank you this is very important article

  • Really good information. I just watched an online seminar that said differently, but I figured the nofollow links had to have some value. I mean comments from people are important

  • hello jerry,
    i offer you to buy all my shares at 30$.
    it’s a real bargain. 20% below fair value.
    will you plase contact me immediately ?
    i would be very happy to make you richer.
    regards

  • Fine discuss on no-follow, bookmark it and I’ll read it tomorrow because it’s too late. Wikis dose a bad work. Why close itself within walls.

  • thank you this is very important article

  • As long as one major search engine ignores No Follow tags, they are technically not working.

  • think Google allows more for no follow than they let on. They don’t tell everything.

  • I don’t think google underestimates nofollow links, I have seen many guys ranking high with no-follow comments.

  • Fine discuss on no-follow, bookmark it and I’ll read it tomorrow

  • Fine discuss on no-follow

  • Very nice and very informative

    Thanks for the article Loren.

  • very interesting, thanks for your article

  • I really don’t care if a site uses no-follow or do-follow atribute…every link I get do matter…

  • I really love this info that you have here on nofollow.

  • So at the end of the day after I post this Yahoo will see it as a backlink.

    I had a website that we were excluding from the robots and yet Yahoo found a post of mine here, counted as a link and actually called the website my user name for about a week until slurp came around to the site. So I would say they might not be tell people the truth.

  • thanks admin.

  • thanks for sharing. Been wondering about that

  • Thanks mate this has cleared up a few niggling little bits of info I was after.

  • Thank you very much for clearing the concept about no follow links.

    If a site is a quality one such as wikipedia and giving you link, it doesn’t matter whether the link is follow or no follow.

  • Official clarification on exactly how each search engine treats nofollow. Thanks for the great information.

  • Thank you for sharing this informative post and clearing the No-follow links. Some web directories offer free links placement services but put the link with this attribute.

    Thanks again and best regards,
    Alex

  • Even though this post is two years old, it still holds water. Since the Big G is where you want to be ranked, it is obviously important to follow what they say – if you have backlinks from do-follow sites with high PR and authority, then you will do well in the search engines.

    I believe Google is now working on relevance and local search results.

    This article is a good place to start, though, for the no-follow mystery.

  • Nice Post! Thanx

  • Even though this post is two years old

  • This article is really interesting. I didn’t realise that search engines treat no follow tags differently. The thing to remember is that Google has somewhere between 78% and 88% or the entire search engine market share (in the UK anyway) and because links with the “no follow” attribute aren’t followed by Googlebot they are of no use in an SEO campaign.

    In the past I have spent lots of time submitting my websites to various web directories only to find out afterwards that the links are no follow – hence of no use to me when trying to build my inbound links for SEO as nearly all of my traffic comes through Google.

  • Nice Post! Thanx

  • n the past I have spent lots of time submitting my websites to various web directories only to find out afterwards that the links are no follow

  • Cool Post there 😀

  • hey its graetes post ever seen

  • don’t think google underestimates nofollow links, I have seen many guys ranking high with no-follow comments.

  • good!thanks!

  • great posting, love u guys.

  • süper foto

  • laptopmu alacan la gel bizim siteye al 😀 akıllı ol akluni aluurummm…. kaybolll

  • bizdeki laptoplar harika bize gelin

  • en ucuz en uygun laptoplar bizde her zaman bekleriz

  • herzaman bizim dükkana bekleriz laptop almak için

  • en güzel laptoplar bizde

  • kulanıma el verişli laptoplar bizde

  • notebook en güzel laptoplar bizde

  • acar laptop almak isteyen bize gelsin

  • acar laptoplar bizde galin bizden alın en uygun laptoplar

  • casper an uygun süper laptoplar bide her zaman bekleriz

  • loptop bızde

  • şeker loptoplar bızde

  • sınırsız loptop ne dersın

  • canın sıkıldımı loptop al

  • ozel ve guzel loptop

  • samsun laptoplar bizde bekleriz

  • laptop parçaları bulunuz bizde

  • en ucuz laptop parçaları bizde bekleriz

  • süper casper kaliteli laptoplar bizde bekleriz

  • laptop almak için bizim yerimize bekleriz sizi

  • istediğiniz laptop modelleri bizde bulunur

  • süper laptop modeller bizde bulunur

  • fıyatları uygum laptoplar var

  • ucuz laptoplar almak istermisiniz

  • ucuz laptop parçaları vardır lamak istermisiniz

  • casper laptop almak istermisiniz

  • toşhiba laptop almak istermisiniz

  • hangi model laptop almak istersin

  • acer laptop almak istermiziniz

  • vestel laptop almak istermisiniz

  • vestel laptop modelleri var bizde bekleriz

  • laptop tamıratı yapılır

  • laptop parcaları tamıratı bulunur

  • tasınana bılır haddısk ıstermısın

  • fotoğrar makınelerımız çok iyi wallla gelın alın

  • Foto makınelerı..

  • bizde en uygun laptoplar bulunur

  • vestel laptoplar bizde bulunur en uygun fayatlar vardır

  • kampanyalı laptoplar var bizde

  • en kampanyalı laptoplar var bizde bekleriz

  • vastel laptoplar bizde kampanyalıdır her zaman bekleriz

  • vestel modeller bizde kampanyalıdır

  • very informative posting.

  • Thanks a lot …. this will really be very helpful and the matter of the fact is the whole content fall so smoothly at place …. make it very readable …. appreciate the effort.

  • Very informative one on no follow links treated by major search engines.The beauty is the interview with top officials of search engines.

  • very useful info, thanks for taking the time to check with the head honchos and sharing the skinny, which I assume is still true ( though I have read elsewhere that google does follow the no follow but doesn’t pass any page rank)

  • Thank you wery mach.. 🙂

  • thank you very mach

  • Thank you for the clarification on no-follow links. Personally, i think a site with only follow-links are unnatural.

    So getting some no-follow links are good in some extent.

    Cheow

  • thank you veri mach. Çok Teşekkürler Yani 😉

  • This article is really informative, i suppose clears all doubts on “no follow” links.

  • çok teşekkür ederim

  • thank you very mach okey!

  • 🙂 Thank you veri mach.

  • thank you veri mach. ı am turkish.

  • en ucuz ve kaliteli mini notebook lar burada.

  • Dude, would it kill you to delete the spam comments?

    So why are the links in blog comments (like this one) no-follow by default? What is the reason behind it?

  • Don’t worry, found your opinion on another blog article of yours: https://www.searchenginejournal.com/13-reasons-why-nofollow-tags-suck/4410/

  • DO you think its relevant to have no-follows on your own blog on the topic?

  • Thank you for clarifying the finer points of “no follow” attributes and search engines.

  • very nice chart 🙂
    good o know for at least ask.com my comment is worth sth 🙂

    funny thing with what google says – I’ve read many time that they DO follow (meaning robot goes to the site) and index it, but doeas not give any PR..

    why with so simple one bit problem we have so much – they do? they dont? 🙂

  • Can,t believe this is a no follow through page

  • About as clear as mud I’d say. As usual you have to read between the lines when digesting exactly what Google says. The only thing we can rely on is that nofollow links block the flow of PageRank. But nothing else can be deduced from that.

  • Need to make a little correction there, as Google indexes the site whether it has no follow or do follow 🙂

    The only tag that prevents an url to get indexed is the no index tag.

    Anyway, great article.

  • Very interesting! I always suspected that the link was actually followed by engines other than Google.

  • I thought I was up on SEO of a website page, This brings new light to tags & no follow tags in particular.

  • I always thought that google follows the no-follow links but does not give pagerank. Thanks for clearing this up.

  • Hmm I just saw that google has listed a inbound link in my webmaster tools that is a nofollow. They should not do this or have I analyzed your article wrong

  • Lou

    This is now outdated, or Google were being liberal with the truth to begin with. I did a test fairly recently on a new blog. Before I even added an entry or pinged it in anyway, I dropped a link to one of its inner pages on a very popular social site which is quite definitely ‘nofollow’ – I even triple checked the source code. By the time it took me to get the browser with my stats up, Googlebot had already visited my site, literally, within seconds. So, they do follow it. My site hasn’t been indexed (yet), but they do ‘follow’ ‘nofollow’.

    To be honest, if they were true to the ‘nofollow’ they invented, they wouldn’t even follow it.

    I know there are some diehard IM’ers out there who want to believe there is some worth to ‘nofollow’ links. The only worth they have is direct traffic, and whether we like it or not, they have no influence on Googles SERPS.

  • @lou – if you have the Google toolbar or anyone who visits that page has then Google will come and visit.

    I believe that anyone using chrome will also trigger a Googlebot visit.

  • akdenizli

    Thenk you very much very nice post

    seslichat
    sesli chat
    sesliakdeniz
    videolar

  • Great read, i always wandered about this it seems as if google is the only engine that is 100% in tune with no follow.

  • OzgurDunyamcom

    Thank you for the information your provide

  • rajajang

    this is nice info for seo specialist, now we have to work accorarding yahoo and other search engine

  • rajajang

    that mean page rank will be low if there is nofollow up working

  • It makes sense

  • This is a great post. I was actually searching info in regards to a WP widget that would be a “dofollow” attribute. However, it's not out there. But after reading your research, it doesn't really matter too much. I always put so much emphasis on making sure every link wasn't “nofollow”. Thanks for the insight!

  • Although I agree with the article with respect to no follow i have a major caveat.

    Imagine you have posted 500 questions on Excel to YAhoo and linked you site to all of them. 10% of the readers followed the link and found something useful and 5 people (10%) created their own links to the content believing it to be useful. Would that not logically mean that there was value in leaving links on sites using the no follow attribute because of percieved indirect value

  • Teşekkürler Admin

  • rajajang

    dofollow links are not easy to get

  • Thanks for setting the record straight on this issue.

  • Good Information about nofollow.

  • Good Information about nofollow.

  • Thank you admin gerekten soalc

  • Thank for the official response. Official is always good. Nice leg work Loren.

  • Thank for the official response. Official is always good. Nice leg work Loren.

  • sohbetmerkezi

    thank you dostum

  • sohbetmerkezi

    thanks dostum

  • sohbetmerkezi

    thank you

  • sohbetmerkezi
  • suskunsair

    Çok teşekkür thak

  • suskunsair
  • seems like yahoo has juice in no follow links. dont know what do you think?

  • Another common misconception is that a “nofollow” link is worthless. It really depends on the program scope and goals. Let's say you have a backlink from a wildly popular site but it uses the rel=”nofollow”.

    The wildly popular site could still drive lots of user traffic which could lead to conversions. Those users who love this wildly popular site and “now” your link could then pass the link on to other friends who could start linking to it from other sources. I mean, it's a wildly popular site, anything could happen.

    I generally pursue them both.

  • It makes sense…you wouldnt want the pr juice to be gained by spammers.

  • seslichatsitesi

    I salute your great site I like Singapore City Stay

  • Anonymous

    Thanks Admin

  • seslialeyram

    Thank Good Post Editörs.

  • kelownacondominium

    Thanks for sharing… Very interesting post… keep on updating

  • Thanks for some great info. There is so much differing information and opinions out there!

  • funnyspeakers

    Nice post… thanks for sharing

  • seslichatsitesi

    Hi, my name would live Turkey Ercan your site every day to follow you great success and I wish I İnzgilizce very low

  • I have found that I have got several links from no follow links on blogs and such

  • I do think that nofollow helps for sure.It is really considered very important if its with anchor text. Thank you for the post it helps for search engine algo information.

  • I do think that nofollow helps for sure.It is really considered very important if its with anchor text. Thank you for the post it helps for search engine algo information.

  • Just say me one thing, if i have archive based post like /2012/12/postname.html
    i should Add nofollow to day pages, Add nofollow to month pages or year page or not?

  • A very enriching artcle

  • Very good article.
    It’s amazing how there is always something very interesting on this site, Thanks guys.