Human preferences still remain the main factor to measure any website’s usefulness and popularity. Today we have a number of trusted third-party sources to explore and compare traffic of any site.
1. Alexa.com - the most popular way to measure website traffic from outside. Despite the fact, most people think it is inaccurate, the info provided by Alexa is widely used to make judgments about the site popularity. Alexa traffic is measured in percentage, i.e. “how many unique users visited the site compared to overall Internet users measured by Alexa.” A few most useful features include:
- the option to compare traffic graphs of up to 5 domains;
- change-range option (1 week, 1 month, 3 and 6 months).

According to them:
Alexa’s traffic rankings are based on the usage patterns of Alexa Toolbar users and data collected from other, diverse sources over a rolling 3 month period.
2. Compete.com also compares up to 5 websites. Apart from monthly traffic stats (”people counts”), the site provides some interesting stats to look into and compare:
- people’s “attention” (the time spent on site compared to overall time spent in the Internet by US people);
- average stay (average time spent on site by one person - in minutes);
- number of pages per one visit;
- velocity = the average change in daily attention.

A few months ago in an interview with Rand Fishkin, Jeremy Crane, the Director of Search & Online Media for Compete, described their data sources this way:
… we collect data on a monthly basis from more than 10 sources including ISP data, ASP data, Custom toolbars/desktop applications, and our own panel. The multiple sources of data allows us to adjust for source bias that can exist with a single source of data, however, it also brings some complications along with it. It’s quite difficult to integrate multiple data sources which is likely the reason no one else in the space has tried it.
3. Google Trends - their new “Websites” feature allows to compare traffic sources over different periods of time (e.g. past month, past year, in a given month/ yeah) on different territories (countries, states, cities). Besides, the tool will also show you “related” search queries and websites.

According to Google:
Vote for this post : 6Trends for Websites combines information from a variety of sources, such as aggregated Google search data, aggregated opt-in anonymous Google Analytics data, opt-in consumer panel data, and other third-party market research.
or Buzz it at Yahoo :







Comments
7 responses so far ↓
Michael Martinez on Jul 9, 2008 at 10:44 am
Quantcast is another valuable traffic estimation tool. However, people should keep in mind that these services get data primarily from U.S. sources — hence, their estimates for sites that obtain a lot of traffic from outside the U.S. tend to be very wrong.
Jillian on Jul 9, 2008 at 6:54 pm
Another trusted place is quanstcast.com and is worth noting at least in the comments here.
Software Testing on Jul 10, 2008 at 2:18 am
@ Ann,
What is your idea about ComScore,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ComScore
Can we use this to explore websites and its traffic behavior?
Saad Kamal on Jul 10, 2008 at 2:34 pm
you missed - http://quantcast.com — which is pretty good too.
avi on Jul 10, 2008 at 6:07 pm
I find that google’s 3 week old product - “google trends for websites” is quite useful. When logged into your google account, and only when logged in, google will release estimated traffic stats for any given non-google owned web site .
For example,
http://trends.google.com/websites?q=searchenginejournal.com
Google trends is showing that SEJ gets approximately 7k-14k unique daily users.
The tool does not provide data on sites that receive very little traffic.
John Spohr on Jul 13, 2008 at 9:37 pm
I think Ann has provided 3 very good tools. And while some don’t like Alexa because they think it is inaccurate, so what… it’s relative. The alleged inaccuracy applies to all sites it analyzes. I use Alexa and other tools as guides, not full blown web analytics.
You have to keep things in perspective!
Regards,
John Spohr
Lowline Angus on Jul 23, 2008 at 9:31 am
I agree. Ann has provided 3 very good tools. But, like a couple people mentioned above, quancast is another good tool too, IMHO.
Leave a Comment