Ask anyone and the first thing they will tell you about socially driven sites like Digg is that the key to getting on the front page is to have good content. While that is true, others will argue that other elements such as interesting titles and descriptions can be just as important.
Most people think that the key to getting on the Digg homepage is great content. Although this is true, a good Digg title and description can make “non-Digg worthy” content reach the homepage.
It is true that you should choose an interesting title so as to get a reader’s attention, but how far should you go? There is a very thin line between making your title interesting and intriguing, and using a title that inaccurately sensationalizes your story to the point where the you are purely relying on (inaccurate) shock value to get the reader to click the link.
The reason why people do this is because it works. But of course this doesn’t make it right. Like Neil has mentioned before,
To increase your chances of getting on Digg’s homepage, try coming up with something unique and funny but don’t forget to make sure it’s still related to the article.
The worst offender I have seen in quite a while is the following submission: Women gives birth, wakes up without arms or legs. If you read the actual story, you will see that this title is a gross misrepresentation of what actually transpired.