<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Yahoo Search Marketing&#8217;s New Quality Ranking : Patent Info &amp; How&#160;To&#8217;s</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.searchenginejournal.com/yahoo-search-marketing-adding-new-quality-ranking-on-february-5th/4306/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/yahoo-search-marketing-adding-new-quality-ranking-on-february-5th/4306/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 00:21:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Website Design</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/yahoo-search-marketing-adding-new-quality-ranking-on-february-5th/4306/comment-page-1/#comment-1271429</link>
		<dc:creator>Website Design</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Apr 2010 02:17:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=4306#comment-1271429</guid>
		<description>Interesting to read the older data.... currently writing up an article about the history of Yahoo marketing efforts.  Thanks for taking up the time to post such a wonderful article!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting to read the older data&#8230;. currently writing up an article about the history of Yahoo marketing efforts.  Thanks for taking up the time to post such a wonderful article!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Website Design</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/yahoo-search-marketing-adding-new-quality-ranking-on-february-5th/4306/comment-page-1/#comment-1248266</link>
		<dc:creator>Website Design</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Apr 2010 21:17:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=4306#comment-1248266</guid>
		<description>Interesting to read the older data.... currently writing up an article about the history of Yahoo marketing efforts.  Thanks for taking up the time to post such a wonderful article!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting to read the older data&#8230;. currently writing up an article about the history of Yahoo marketing efforts.  Thanks for taking up the time to post such a wonderful article!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daryl Saari</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/yahoo-search-marketing-adding-new-quality-ranking-on-february-5th/4306/comment-page-1/#comment-1097525</link>
		<dc:creator>Daryl Saari</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2009 22:30:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=4306#comment-1097525</guid>
		<description>Like your site, and all the great tips that are mentioned on it, it has really helped out. Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Like your site, and all the great tips that are mentioned on it, it has really helped out. Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Ben-Nes</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/yahoo-search-marketing-adding-new-quality-ranking-on-february-5th/4306/comment-page-1/#comment-773007</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Ben-Nes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Dec 2007 10:33:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=4306#comment-773007</guid>
		<description>On Google my ad quality rank is at the highest.
Same one on Yahoo got only 2 of 5...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On Google my ad quality rank is at the highest.<br />
Same one on Yahoo got only 2 of 5&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ralph</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/yahoo-search-marketing-adding-new-quality-ranking-on-february-5th/4306/comment-page-1/#comment-694705</link>
		<dc:creator>Ralph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2007 21:29:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=4306#comment-694705</guid>
		<description>I have not paid a dime for any hits to anyone for anything. But my ranking in Google rose above my usurper&#039;s site in which he paid for hits. Google demonstrates 11.6 hits to only 1 from Yahoo.  And I have only started with two select AdSense ads just last week (10-25-07)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have not paid a dime for any hits to anyone for anything. But my ranking in Google rose above my usurper&#8217;s site in which he paid for hits. Google demonstrates 11.6 hits to only 1 from Yahoo.  And I have only started with two select AdSense ads just last week (10-25-07)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guy Hoogewerf</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/yahoo-search-marketing-adding-new-quality-ranking-on-february-5th/4306/comment-page-1/#comment-538340</link>
		<dc:creator>Guy Hoogewerf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2007 18:24:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=4306#comment-538340</guid>
		<description>I am going to be slammed for this, but as I have 15 accounts with Yahoo I feel I have the right, the whole upgrade is a disaster... this is a highly complicated beast of an upgrade full of good intent, but lets face it, when you have 30% of the market share you need a system that requires 30% of the time, I currently spend 1-3 hours week on Google, but 8-12 hours on yahoo. Nightmare, the return is no longer there with this new system, sorry.

I can explian more, check my Blog.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am going to be slammed for this, but as I have 15 accounts with Yahoo I feel I have the right, the whole upgrade is a disaster&#8230; this is a highly complicated beast of an upgrade full of good intent, but lets face it, when you have 30% of the market share you need a system that requires 30% of the time, I currently spend 1-3 hours week on Google, but 8-12 hours on yahoo. Nightmare, the return is no longer there with this new system, sorry.</p>
<p>I can explian more, check my Blog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anton</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/yahoo-search-marketing-adding-new-quality-ranking-on-february-5th/4306/comment-page-1/#comment-377569</link>
		<dc:creator>anton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Jan 2007 23:33:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=4306#comment-377569</guid>
		<description>I just try to set up a Marketing Ad Strategy with Yahoo and gladly will report back how things are going. So far I like what I see and hear as Yahoo seems to pay specific attention to the local Advertiser or so called local Market. Will also compare it directly to MSN as I have used some of their beta and test solutions with good results. Valid Search Results on the local Business Market have to improve much more with all three Players. The Results just vary in many cases just too much or are irrelevant to the Search</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just try to set up a Marketing Ad Strategy with Yahoo and gladly will report back how things are going. So far I like what I see and hear as Yahoo seems to pay specific attention to the local Advertiser or so called local Market. Will also compare it directly to MSN as I have used some of their beta and test solutions with good results. Valid Search Results on the local Business Market have to improve much more with all three Players. The Results just vary in many cases just too much or are irrelevant to the Search</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/yahoo-search-marketing-adding-new-quality-ranking-on-february-5th/4306/comment-page-1/#comment-372243</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jan 2007 22:45:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=4306#comment-372243</guid>
		<description>From an advertisers perspective, the Yahoo Ad site is much more complicated to navigate than Google&#039;s.  Maybe my mind is just google-centric, but I understood what I was doing when advertising with Google and I often found myself lost and frustrated with Yahoo.  My ads would get accepted one day....then certain key words would be removed 3 days later.  Yes they have rules and everyone has rules, but I never really understood and consequently stuck with Google....so I hope that they change a few things within the Advertiser site itself as mentioned in the article.

John
http://www.monomachines.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From an advertisers perspective, the Yahoo Ad site is much more complicated to navigate than Google&#8217;s.  Maybe my mind is just google-centric, but I understood what I was doing when advertising with Google and I often found myself lost and frustrated with Yahoo.  My ads would get accepted one day&#8230;.then certain key words would be removed 3 days later.  Yes they have rules and everyone has rules, but I never really understood and consequently stuck with Google&#8230;.so I hope that they change a few things within the Advertiser site itself as mentioned in the article.</p>
<p>John<br />
<a href="http://www.monomachines.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.monomachines.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rational Beaver</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/yahoo-search-marketing-adding-new-quality-ranking-on-february-5th/4306/comment-page-1/#comment-372188</link>
		<dc:creator>Rational Beaver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jan 2007 20:43:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=4306#comment-372188</guid>
		<description>Everett: The way I read it, they are using organic results to determine the relevancy of your ad, not your landing page. Yahoo will be comparing your ad to the organic results for the same keyword. So if you&#039;re the number 1 organic result for &#039;widget&#039; your ad for the keyword &#039;widget&#039; will probably get a slightly higher quality score for that. (If this is true, then firms who provide both SEO and PPC services have cause to rejoice...)

I am sure that Yahoo will look at your landing pages as well and, if they do it like Google, they&#039;ll use a separate spider that will simply follow the URLs you give them as your landing pages in the system.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Everett: The way I read it, they are using organic results to determine the relevancy of your ad, not your landing page. Yahoo will be comparing your ad to the organic results for the same keyword. So if you&#8217;re the number 1 organic result for &#8216;widget&#8217; your ad for the keyword &#8216;widget&#8217; will probably get a slightly higher quality score for that. (If this is true, then firms who provide both SEO and PPC services have cause to rejoice&#8230;)</p>
<p>I am sure that Yahoo will look at your landing pages as well and, if they do it like Google, they&#8217;ll use a separate spider that will simply follow the URLs you give them as your landing pages in the system.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: a</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/yahoo-search-marketing-adding-new-quality-ranking-on-february-5th/4306/comment-page-1/#comment-372187</link>
		<dc:creator>a</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jan 2007 20:42:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=4306#comment-372187</guid>
		<description>I know I may get slammed for this, but I like Yahoo&#039;s customer service much more then Google&#039;s.  When I setup my Yahoo Store, and the developers were testing my account, and posted about $50 worth of commissions, I had to pay. After speaking with Yahoo, they credited me back the charges, escalating my concerns from level 1 support to level 2 support.

While Google just isn&#039;t as friendly from my experience.  I have never heard of a story, where Google was willing to reimburse for a mistake.

So, I&#039;m glad Yahoo has  a new search platform, which I hope will be successful.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know I may get slammed for this, but I like Yahoo&#8217;s customer service much more then Google&#8217;s.  When I setup my Yahoo Store, and the developers were testing my account, and posted about $50 worth of commissions, I had to pay. After speaking with Yahoo, they credited me back the charges, escalating my concerns from level 1 support to level 2 support.</p>
<p>While Google just isn&#8217;t as friendly from my experience.  I have never heard of a story, where Google was willing to reimburse for a mistake.</p>
<p>So, I&#8217;m glad Yahoo has  a new search platform, which I hope will be successful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

