<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Yahoo Cedes Victory to&#160;Google?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.searchenginejournal.com/yahoo-cedes-victory-to-google/5038/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/yahoo-cedes-victory-to-google/5038/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 09:28:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Walt C.</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/yahoo-cedes-victory-to-google/5038/comment-page-1/#comment-484154</link>
		<dc:creator>Walt C.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2007 07:35:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/yahoo-cedes-victory-to-google/5038/#comment-484154</guid>
		<description>I say... just use squeba! (squeba dot com) &#124; This site combined the best search engines on one page (google, yahoo, msn) ... they also included boxes for ebay, wikipedia, and dictionary.com as well.

I use this as my start page and would never use a single start page again. Why choose just one when you can have them all?

go squeba!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I say&#8230; just use squeba! (squeba dot com) | This site combined the best search engines on one page (google, yahoo, msn) &#8230; they also included boxes for ebay, wikipedia, and dictionary.com as well.</p>
<p>I use this as my start page and would never use a single start page again. Why choose just one when you can have them all?</p>
<p>go squeba!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wayne Smallman</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/yahoo-cedes-victory-to-google/5038/comment-page-1/#comment-483561</link>
		<dc:creator>Wayne Smallman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jun 2007 14:35:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/yahoo-cedes-victory-to-google/5038/#comment-483561</guid>
		<description>I used to use iGoogle, but then I found Netvibes. Didn&#039;t really looked back.

Especially with the Box.net widget...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I used to use iGoogle, but then I found Netvibes. Didn&#8217;t really looked back.</p>
<p>Especially with the Box.net widget&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: liam</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/yahoo-cedes-victory-to-google/5038/comment-page-1/#comment-483554</link>
		<dc:creator>liam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jun 2007 14:22:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/yahoo-cedes-victory-to-google/5038/#comment-483554</guid>
		<description>Personalization is definitely the future for the web, but who&#039;s going to use yahoo with iGoogle around?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Personalization is definitely the future for the web, but who&#8217;s going to use yahoo with iGoogle around?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wayne Smallman</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/yahoo-cedes-victory-to-google/5038/comment-page-1/#comment-483411</link>
		<dc:creator>Wayne Smallman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jun 2007 11:46:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/yahoo-cedes-victory-to-google/5038/#comment-483411</guid>
		<description>Personally, I think Y! are doing the right thing.

They&#039;ve been branching out into specialist social portals, such as Yahoo! OurCities, more commercial ventures such as the Brand Universe properties, as well as deals with Dash in-car Sat-Nav.

If getting into the whole social web thing is the way to go, then could we argue that Google are playing catch-up to Yahoo!?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Personally, I think Y! are doing the right thing.</p>
<p>They&#8217;ve been branching out into specialist social portals, such as Yahoo! OurCities, more commercial ventures such as the Brand Universe properties, as well as deals with Dash in-car Sat-Nav.</p>
<p>If getting into the whole social web thing is the way to go, then could we argue that Google are playing catch-up to Yahoo!?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MG Siegler</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/yahoo-cedes-victory-to-google/5038/comment-page-1/#comment-482001</link>
		<dc:creator>MG Siegler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 08:13:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/yahoo-cedes-victory-to-google/5038/#comment-482001</guid>
		<description>I agree, I&#039;m a bit disappointed with Yahoo stepping back and rethinking search - I saw them as a great alternative to Google. But this probably is the smart move on their part - no one is going to catch the G-men despite Microsoft&#039;s willingness to throw money at any problem, at any time. 

At least by taking it in another direction, Yahoo has a chance of uncovering the next big thing that we&#039;ll all be talking about in 10 years.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree, I&#8217;m a bit disappointed with Yahoo stepping back and rethinking search &#8211; I saw them as a great alternative to Google. But this probably is the smart move on their part &#8211; no one is going to catch the G-men despite Microsoft&#8217;s willingness to throw money at any problem, at any time. </p>
<p>At least by taking it in another direction, Yahoo has a chance of uncovering the next big thing that we&#8217;ll all be talking about in 10 years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Raj Dash</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/yahoo-cedes-victory-to-google/5038/comment-page-1/#comment-481817</link>
		<dc:creator>Raj Dash</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 02:26:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/yahoo-cedes-victory-to-google/5038/#comment-481817</guid>
		<description>Pablo, I agree. I think Yahoo&#039;s CEO (can&#039;t remember her name) is so stockholder-centric that the whole company loses sight of the important person: the end user. They&#039;ve got something Google doesn&#039;t: Yahoo Pipes. But Google has all those great web 2.0 apps.

Yahoo: Stop competing with Google and just come out with more great apps.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pablo, I agree. I think Yahoo&#8217;s CEO (can&#8217;t remember her name) is so stockholder-centric that the whole company loses sight of the important person: the end user. They&#8217;ve got something Google doesn&#8217;t: Yahoo Pipes. But Google has all those great web 2.0 apps.</p>
<p>Yahoo: Stop competing with Google and just come out with more great apps.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pablo Palatnik</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/yahoo-cedes-victory-to-google/5038/comment-page-1/#comment-481802</link>
		<dc:creator>Pablo Palatnik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 02:22:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/yahoo-cedes-victory-to-google/5038/#comment-481802</guid>
		<description>It seems like Yahoo! is in a constant struggle trying to switch directions from where Google is headed. I think a lot of it has to do with its dissapointing Q1 with it&#039;s shareholders...First it&#039;s all about connectiong people..now it&#039;s all about personalization. I think these are all good plans, but  I think they do still compete with Google in search and releasing statements, etc. for stockholders and future stockholders, hoping to jump on board and hopefully get thier stock to rise.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems like Yahoo! is in a constant struggle trying to switch directions from where Google is headed. I think a lot of it has to do with its dissapointing Q1 with it&#8217;s shareholders&#8230;First it&#8217;s all about connectiong people..now it&#8217;s all about personalization. I think these are all good plans, but  I think they do still compete with Google in search and releasing statements, etc. for stockholders and future stockholders, hoping to jump on board and hopefully get thier stock to rise.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

