<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Write For People, Not Search&#160;Engines</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.searchenginejournal.com/write-for-people-not-search-engines/10709/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/write-for-people-not-search-engines/10709/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 15:12:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: John S. Britsios (Webnauts)</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/write-for-people-not-search-engines/10709/comment-page-/#comment-1109615</link>
		<dc:creator>John S. Britsios (Webnauts)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 22:46:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=10709#comment-1109615</guid>
		<description>@links of london, if you were not attempting to drop a link here (spam), can you please explain what part do you not agree with?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@links of london, if you were not attempting to drop a link here (spam), can you please explain what part do you not agree with?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mariano</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/write-for-people-not-search-engines/10709/comment-page-1/#comment-1101872</link>
		<dc:creator>Mariano</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 21:42:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=10709#comment-1101872</guid>
		<description>Indeed, the basics are the basics and if you do not have good, human friendly, content then you can SEO &#039;till the cows come home to no avail since you will get traffic that quickly makes a u-turn.

aDios,
Mariano</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Indeed, the basics are the basics and if you do not have good, human friendly, content then you can SEO &#8217;till the cows come home to no avail since you will get traffic that quickly makes a u-turn.</p>
<p>aDios,<br />
Mariano</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/write-for-people-not-search-engines/10709/comment-page-1/#comment-1101785</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 00:15:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=10709#comment-1101785</guid>
		<description>I must admit to being someone that spends to long worrying about making the posts and copy of my page perfect rather than just worrying about content. A well written article .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I must admit to being someone that spends to long worrying about making the posts and copy of my page perfect rather than just worrying about content. A well written article .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jackie</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/write-for-people-not-search-engines/10709/comment-page-1/#comment-1101729</link>
		<dc:creator>Jackie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 14:02:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=10709#comment-1101729</guid>
		<description>Thank you.  I don&#039;t think you&#039;re saying it&#039;s all or nothing in regard to optimizing for SEO.  But I love hearing that writing with integrity to serve a sincere purpose can frequently achieve both obectives.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you.  I don&#8217;t think you&#8217;re saying it&#8217;s all or nothing in regard to optimizing for SEO.  But I love hearing that writing with integrity to serve a sincere purpose can frequently achieve both obectives.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Les</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/write-for-people-not-search-engines/10709/comment-page-1/#comment-1101720</link>
		<dc:creator>Les</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 12:50:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=10709#comment-1101720</guid>
		<description>I agree. People will get bored quickly with content that has repetitive words etc. 

Your point about frequent posts also holds true. 

I am doing much of what you mention above + using a few other choice WP plugins.

I am also experimenting with Disqus - for commenting etc. There is some good link juice there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree. People will get bored quickly with content that has repetitive words etc. </p>
<p>Your point about frequent posts also holds true. </p>
<p>I am doing much of what you mention above + using a few other choice WP plugins.</p>
<p>I am also experimenting with Disqus &#8211; for commenting etc. There is some good link juice there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tag44</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/write-for-people-not-search-engines/10709/comment-page-1/#comment-1101718</link>
		<dc:creator>Tag44</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 12:23:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=10709#comment-1101718</guid>
		<description>Thanks David for such useful information to keep in mind while writing the content of the site.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks David for such useful information to keep in mind while writing the content of the site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thebitbot</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/write-for-people-not-search-engines/10709/comment-page-1/#comment-1101701</link>
		<dc:creator>thebitbot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 10:03:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=10709#comment-1101701</guid>
		<description>Bravo! Nice read.  Search engines do not read for enjoyment anyway...:)

http://www.thebitbot.com - an enhanced Google custom search engine...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bravo! Nice read.  Search engines do not read for enjoyment anyway&#8230;:)</p>
<p><a href="http://www.thebitbot.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.thebitbot.com</a> &#8211; an enhanced Google custom search engine&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Susan</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/write-for-people-not-search-engines/10709/comment-page-1/#comment-1101674</link>
		<dc:creator>Susan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 01:17:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=10709#comment-1101674</guid>
		<description>Amen!!!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amen!!!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AJ Kohn</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/write-for-people-not-search-engines/10709/comment-page-1/#comment-1101631</link>
		<dc:creator>AJ Kohn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 17:19:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=10709#comment-1101631</guid>
		<description>I disagree for the most part, and here&#039;s why. 

Writing for people and writing for search engines is not mutually exclusive. Furthermore, who has the bigger audience, the subscribers to your blog or people searching for content on Google? 

The idea of SEO is to ensure that your content is delivered to the people who are seeking it out. This means you need to be concise and focused.

A person (or a search engine) needs to understand what the content is about to find and enjoy it. 

If you referred to Twitter as Twister you&#039;re not going to connect with the people who might be searching for your content. Sure, people might spread your content and you might get links but that&#039;s the type of thing that only happens *easily* for a small fraction of bloggers - of which you are one.

For most of us, that just doesn&#039;t happen. And that&#039;s where writing in a way that benefits both the reader and the search engine is critical. 

Search Engines are like blind five year olds (http://www.blindfiveyearold.com/search-engines-are-like-blind-five-year-olds) they don&#039;t care how pretty your site is, and they need to be told a number of times what something is about and where to go next. And to be honest, this helps your average reader as well.

People have limited time and they *scan* articles. Make it easy for them to understand what your writing about and they&#039;ll a) read it b) understand it and c) pass it along. 

You can think about a blog post like a book in a library. (http://www.blindfiveyearold.com/seo-holy-trinity)

There are rows upon rows of books. An average person wandering in is going to look at the title on the spine to determine what that book is about - that&#039;s your browser title. 

Then they might take it down off the shelf and read the synopsis to see if it&#039;s really what they&#039;re looking for - that&#039;s the meta description. 

The URL is essentially the dewy decimal system in the analogy. 

But all three should be focused and informative so that anyone - at a glance - can understand that they&#039;ve found the right item. 

Shelve a horror book under technology and you&#039;re not going to get a lot of folks reading it.

Once opening the book you need to deliver great content and it should be of the same topic as your title and meta description or you&#039;ll chase readers off. 

You *do* want to write for the search engine because it also benefits your readers. I could go on and on but I&#039;ll stop and step off my soapbox.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I disagree for the most part, and here&#8217;s why. </p>
<p>Writing for people and writing for search engines is not mutually exclusive. Furthermore, who has the bigger audience, the subscribers to your blog or people searching for content on Google? </p>
<p>The idea of SEO is to ensure that your content is delivered to the people who are seeking it out. This means you need to be concise and focused.</p>
<p>A person (or a search engine) needs to understand what the content is about to find and enjoy it. </p>
<p>If you referred to Twitter as Twister you&#8217;re not going to connect with the people who might be searching for your content. Sure, people might spread your content and you might get links but that&#8217;s the type of thing that only happens *easily* for a small fraction of bloggers &#8211; of which you are one.</p>
<p>For most of us, that just doesn&#8217;t happen. And that&#8217;s where writing in a way that benefits both the reader and the search engine is critical. </p>
<p>Search Engines are like blind five year olds (<a href="http://www.blindfiveyearold.com/search-engines-are-like-blind-five-year-olds" rel="nofollow">http://www.blindfiveyearold.com/search-engines-are-like-blind-five-year-olds</a>) they don&#8217;t care how pretty your site is, and they need to be told a number of times what something is about and where to go next. And to be honest, this helps your average reader as well.</p>
<p>People have limited time and they *scan* articles. Make it easy for them to understand what your writing about and they&#8217;ll a) read it b) understand it and c) pass it along. </p>
<p>You can think about a blog post like a book in a library. (<a href="http://www.blindfiveyearold.com/seo-holy-trinity" rel="nofollow">http://www.blindfiveyearold.com/seo-holy-trinity</a>)</p>
<p>There are rows upon rows of books. An average person wandering in is going to look at the title on the spine to determine what that book is about &#8211; that&#8217;s your browser title. </p>
<p>Then they might take it down off the shelf and read the synopsis to see if it&#8217;s really what they&#8217;re looking for &#8211; that&#8217;s the meta description. </p>
<p>The URL is essentially the dewy decimal system in the analogy. </p>
<p>But all three should be focused and informative so that anyone &#8211; at a glance &#8211; can understand that they&#8217;ve found the right item. </p>
<p>Shelve a horror book under technology and you&#8217;re not going to get a lot of folks reading it.</p>
<p>Once opening the book you need to deliver great content and it should be of the same topic as your title and meta description or you&#8217;ll chase readers off. </p>
<p>You *do* want to write for the search engine because it also benefits your readers. I could go on and on but I&#8217;ll stop and step off my soapbox.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Melody Haines</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/write-for-people-not-search-engines/10709/comment-page-1/#comment-1101630</link>
		<dc:creator>Melody Haines</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 17:13:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=10709#comment-1101630</guid>
		<description>Thank you, David!  When I read &quot;So, if you’re not publishing to your blog often enough because you’re letting SEO concerns turn you into a paralyzed perfectionist, stop that right now. Make your post interesting and publish it.&quot;--it was like you were talking directly to me! :D I really needed to hear that right here, right now.  So thanks again, from the bottom of my heart.  What I really want to do is help people with my blog, and it&#039;s nice to know that that is what is most important, after all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you, David!  When I read &#8220;So, if you’re not publishing to your blog often enough because you’re letting SEO concerns turn you into a paralyzed perfectionist, stop that right now. Make your post interesting and publish it.&#8221;&#8211;it was like you were talking directly to me! :D I really needed to hear that right here, right now.  So thanks again, from the bottom of my heart.  What I really want to do is help people with my blog, and it&#8217;s nice to know that that is what is most important, after all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

