<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: WordPress Plugin Hurting Google&#160;Rankings?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.searchenginejournal.com/wordpress-plugin-hurting-google-rankings/5178/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/wordpress-plugin-hurting-google-rankings/5178/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 16:48:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy Moore</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/wordpress-plugin-hurting-google-rankings/5178/comment-page-1/#comment-512469</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Moore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2007 09:34:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/wordpress-plugin-hurting-google-rankings/5178/#comment-512469</guid>
		<description>Try my version of a WordPress Mobile Plugin, it&#039;s more SEO friendly than the others.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Try my version of a WordPress Mobile Plugin, it&#8217;s more SEO friendly than the others.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Single Grain</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/wordpress-plugin-hurting-google-rankings/5178/comment-page-1/#comment-506522</link>
		<dc:creator>Single Grain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2007 16:12:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/wordpress-plugin-hurting-google-rankings/5178/#comment-506522</guid>
		<description>I had the same problem with the print page plugin.  Google gives you a penality for dupe content.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had the same problem with the print page plugin.  Google gives you a penality for dupe content.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sherwin</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/wordpress-plugin-hurting-google-rankings/5178/comment-page-1/#comment-506051</link>
		<dc:creator>Sherwin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2007 05:40:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/wordpress-plugin-hurting-google-rankings/5178/#comment-506051</guid>
		<description>Hey I hadn&#039;t come here for a little bit. I love those icons at the end of the article. Can I steal the idea? :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey I hadn&#8217;t come here for a little bit. I love those icons at the end of the article. Can I steal the idea? :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sushubh</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/wordpress-plugin-hurting-google-rankings/5178/comment-page-1/#comment-504716</link>
		<dc:creator>Sushubh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2007 23:24:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/wordpress-plugin-hurting-google-rankings/5178/#comment-504716</guid>
		<description>i guess in the end it depends upon the user. how he implements the plugin and checks the end result... most plugins are not tested on a wider platform and search engine friendliness is not a major criteria for all...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i guess in the end it depends upon the user. how he implements the plugin and checks the end result&#8230; most plugins are not tested on a wider platform and search engine friendliness is not a major criteria for all&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sushubh</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/wordpress-plugin-hurting-google-rankings/5178/comment-page-1/#comment-504714</link>
		<dc:creator>Sushubh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2007 23:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/wordpress-plugin-hurting-google-rankings/5178/#comment-504714</guid>
		<description>i think the same issue exists with the print page plugin. it gets indexed by google and you might get penalized for content duplication...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i think the same issue exists with the print page plugin. it gets indexed by google and you might get penalized for content duplication&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Hearne</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/wordpress-plugin-hurting-google-rankings/5178/comment-page-1/#comment-504627</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Hearne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2007 21:12:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/wordpress-plugin-hurting-google-rankings/5178/#comment-504627</guid>
		<description>Hi Loren

The apparent fix for this comes in the guise of a patch file for the database:
http://wurfl.sourceforge.net/web_browsers_patch.xml

More info on the patch file can be found at:
http://wurfl.sourceforge.net/patchfile.php

I haven&#039;t been able to test it as my hosting isn&#039;t happy with the file permissions.

This plugin is just a little too touchy, so if you&#039;re not at ease dealing with file permissions and applying the patch you may want to give it a wide berth.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Loren</p>
<p>The apparent fix for this comes in the guise of a patch file for the database:<br />
<a href="http://wurfl.sourceforge.net/web_browsers_patch.xml" rel="nofollow">http://wurfl.sourceforge.net/web_browsers_patch.xml</a></p>
<p>More info on the patch file can be found at:<br />
<a href="http://wurfl.sourceforge.net/patchfile.php" rel="nofollow">http://wurfl.sourceforge.net/patchfile.php</a></p>
<p>I haven&#8217;t been able to test it as my hosting isn&#8217;t happy with the file permissions.</p>
<p>This plugin is just a little too touchy, so if you&#8217;re not at ease dealing with file permissions and applying the patch you may want to give it a wide berth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

