<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Windows Live Search Gets an Interactive Interface, Sort&#160;of</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.searchenginejournal.com/windows-live-search-gets-an-interactive-interface-sort-of/7389/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/windows-live-search-gets-an-interactive-interface-sort-of/7389/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 22:19:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erik Cunningham</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/windows-live-search-gets-an-interactive-interface-sort-of/7389/comment-page-1/#comment-1083441</link>
		<dc:creator>Erik Cunningham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 14:14:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/windows-live-search-gets-an-interactive-interface-sort-of/7389/#comment-1083441</guid>
		<description>Personally, I like the photo and the hotspots.  Unfortunately they have nothing to do with my search topic.  I can see this technique adding value to a site like National Geographic or the Travel Channel, but not on the homepage of a major search engine.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Personally, I like the photo and the hotspots.  Unfortunately they have nothing to do with my search topic.  I can see this technique adding value to a site like National Geographic or the Travel Channel, but not on the homepage of a major search engine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MelC</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/windows-live-search-gets-an-interactive-interface-sort-of/7389/comment-page-1/#comment-1083425</link>
		<dc:creator>MelC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 08:38:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/windows-live-search-gets-an-interactive-interface-sort-of/7389/#comment-1083425</guid>
		<description>@Alphane Moon - You can see it if you change your Live Search location setting: http://www.melcarson.com/new-live-search-homepage-for-the-us.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Alphane Moon &#8211; You can see it if you change your Live Search location setting: <a href="http://www.melcarson.com/new-live-search-homepage-for-the-us.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.melcarson.com/new-live-search-homepage-for-the-us.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Farley - AmplifySEO</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/windows-live-search-gets-an-interactive-interface-sort-of/7389/comment-page-1/#comment-1083423</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Farley - AmplifySEO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 07:24:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/windows-live-search-gets-an-interactive-interface-sort-of/7389/#comment-1083423</guid>
		<description>We&#039;re definitely seeing a trend towards creativity in simplicity.  Google&#039;s home page has always been simple.  Simple is good.  Simple is easy to grasp.  Simple works for everyone short of the a Rockstar fueled technophile.

I however think it&#039;s time for more, not a Yahoo!esk version of more but a creative yet simple more.  A tasteful interface.  Cuil is a great example of this and what Microsoft is doing with Live Search is another example.

I for one am ready for the change.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We&#8217;re definitely seeing a trend towards creativity in simplicity.  Google&#8217;s home page has always been simple.  Simple is good.  Simple is easy to grasp.  Simple works for everyone short of the a Rockstar fueled technophile.</p>
<p>I however think it&#8217;s time for more, not a Yahoo!esk version of more but a creative yet simple more.  A tasteful interface.  Cuil is a great example of this and what Microsoft is doing with Live Search is another example.</p>
<p>I for one am ready for the change.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alphane Moon</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/windows-live-search-gets-an-interactive-interface-sort-of/7389/comment-page-1/#comment-1083422</link>
		<dc:creator>Alphane Moon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 07:16:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/windows-live-search-gets-an-interactive-interface-sort-of/7389/#comment-1083422</guid>
		<description>&quot;Today we&#039;re releasing the new home page in the U.S. only&quot;, so I can&#039;t see it today ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Today we&#8217;re releasing the new home page in the U.S. only&#8221;, so I can&#8217;t see it today &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/windows-live-search-gets-an-interactive-interface-sort-of/7389/comment-page-1/#comment-1083419</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 04:48:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/windows-live-search-gets-an-interactive-interface-sort-of/7389/#comment-1083419</guid>
		<description>Okay, I get that you don&#039;t like it, but instead of peppering your pseudo-reporting with snarky &quot;(not!)&quot; and &quot;really&quot; (as if you&#039;re some sort of bad SNL skit), why don&#039;t you actually explain what you think and why think that way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay, I get that you don&#8217;t like it, but instead of peppering your pseudo-reporting with snarky &#8220;(not!)&#8221; and &#8220;really&#8221; (as if you&#8217;re some sort of bad SNL skit), why don&#8217;t you actually explain what you think and why think that way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

