<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wikipedia Thinking Advertising : Google, Yahoo or&#160;Who?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.searchenginejournal.com/wikipedia-thinking-advertising-google-yahoo-or-who/2721/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/wikipedia-thinking-advertising-google-yahoo-or-who/2721/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 03:49:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Refinance Quotes WebLog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Google Expands Advertising Monetization Program</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/wikipedia-thinking-advertising-google-yahoo-or-who/2721/comment-page-1/#comment-533838</link>
		<dc:creator>Refinance Quotes WebLog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Google Expands Advertising Monetization Program</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jul 2007 01:50:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=2721#comment-533838</guid>
		<description>[...] Wikipedia Thinking Advertising : Google, Yahoo or Who? Wikipedia Thinking Advertising : Google, Yahoo or Who? &#8230; the charitable mission could be supported by money raised through advertising. &#8230; ridiculous ’shoot the monkey, win a free iPod &#8230; http://www.searchenginejournal.com/wikipedia-thinking-advertising-google-yahoo-or-who/2721/ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Wikipedia Thinking Advertising : Google, Yahoo or Who? Wikipedia Thinking Advertising : Google, Yahoo or Who? &#8230; the charitable mission could be supported by money raised through advertising. &#8230; ridiculous ’shoot the monkey, win a free iPod &#8230; <a href="http://www.searchenginejournal.com/wikipedia-thinking-advertising-google-yahoo-or-who/2721/" rel="nofollow">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/wikipedia-thinking-advertising-google-yahoo-or-who/2721/</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wattinne</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/wikipedia-thinking-advertising-google-yahoo-or-who/2721/comment-page-1/#comment-57192</link>
		<dc:creator>Wattinne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2006 15:49:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=2721#comment-57192</guid>
		<description>I heard that a company is offering a technology similar to Google Adsense and Adword but on a private label basis, meaning that the owner of the platform manage and control the advertisers (content of ads, pricing...)..why Wikipedia would not take that opportunity to recruit its advertisers with its own &quot;business&quot; rules ? The company name is www.ads-click.com. What would be better for an non profit organisation than being independent from big money maker ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I heard that a company is offering a technology similar to Google Adsense and Adword but on a private label basis, meaning that the owner of the platform manage and control the advertisers (content of ads, pricing&#8230;)..why Wikipedia would not take that opportunity to recruit its advertisers with its own &#8220;business&#8221; rules ? The company name is <a href="http://www.ads-click.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.ads-click.com</a>. What would be better for an non profit organisation than being independent from big money maker ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patty Dukes</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/wikipedia-thinking-advertising-google-yahoo-or-who/2721/comment-page-1/#comment-57182</link>
		<dc:creator>Patty Dukes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2006 14:27:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=2721#comment-57182</guid>
		<description>I approve of ads. I am not sure about U.S. users, but accessing Wikipedia from Japan takes a long time and often returns error messages. Any company needs money to grow and provide better services. If ads means that I can get faster access due to upgraded servers, then they have my vote.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I approve of ads. I am not sure about U.S. users, but accessing Wikipedia from Japan takes a long time and often returns error messages. Any company needs money to grow and provide better services. If ads means that I can get faster access due to upgraded servers, then they have my vote.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rock</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/wikipedia-thinking-advertising-google-yahoo-or-who/2721/comment-page-1/#comment-57164</link>
		<dc:creator>Rock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2006 09:27:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=2721#comment-57164</guid>
		<description>2) Sorry for forgetting to add my second point.. but uh if I remember correctly Jimmy Wales assured people on Wikipedia that it would never run ads. If you say something and do something else, you are a hypocrite - plain and simple</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>2) Sorry for forgetting to add my second point.. but uh if I remember correctly Jimmy Wales assured people on Wikipedia that it would never run ads. If you say something and do something else, you are a hypocrite &#8211; plain and simple</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stevo</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/wikipedia-thinking-advertising-google-yahoo-or-who/2721/comment-page-1/#comment-57149</link>
		<dc:creator>Stevo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2006 07:13:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=2721#comment-57149</guid>
		<description>Since when is throwing an ad-banner on a webpage &quot;selling out?&quot; I may be one of the growing few with this opinion, but it&#039;s not like the Wikipedia founder can just stash the cash generated from ads anyway. Wakeup, skeptics--has anybody forgotten that Wikipedia is a non-profit organization?

Even without the understanding of what Wikipedia&#039;s non-profit nature represents, there&#039;s still a worthwhile argument to make about advertising in wikipedia: Unless wikipedia penny&amp;dollar contributors are willing to keep up with &amp; reach beyond the pace of expenses that it costs to run this great encyclopedia, &quot;Jimbo&quot; has to face reality--whether skeptical Wikitopeans want it or not. If donations don&#039;t suffice, Wikipedia will fall.. unless there is another better means of finding revenue to keep it&#039;s blood flowing.

As a *heavy* wikipedia user and small-time contributor myself, I personally wouldn&#039;t mind an unobtrusive adspace on wikipedia. If the advertising system provides relevant ads to the Wiki content--rather than some annoyingly ridiculous &#039;shoot the monkey, win a free iPod&#039; brainless banner, then nothing is lost in Wikipedia&#039;s compromise for survival and thriving. The knowledge is still free (in every sense of the word), and the founding organization will not only have enough revenue to keep Wikipedia going, they&#039;ll have enough to make it even better (expanding Wikimedia &amp; other projects).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since when is throwing an ad-banner on a webpage &#8220;selling out?&#8221; I may be one of the growing few with this opinion, but it&#8217;s not like the Wikipedia founder can just stash the cash generated from ads anyway. Wakeup, skeptics&#8211;has anybody forgotten that Wikipedia is a non-profit organization?</p>
<p>Even without the understanding of what Wikipedia&#8217;s non-profit nature represents, there&#8217;s still a worthwhile argument to make about advertising in wikipedia: Unless wikipedia penny&#038;dollar contributors are willing to keep up with &#038; reach beyond the pace of expenses that it costs to run this great encyclopedia, &#8220;Jimbo&#8221; has to face reality&#8211;whether skeptical Wikitopeans want it or not. If donations don&#8217;t suffice, Wikipedia will fall.. unless there is another better means of finding revenue to keep it&#8217;s blood flowing.</p>
<p>As a *heavy* wikipedia user and small-time contributor myself, I personally wouldn&#8217;t mind an unobtrusive adspace on wikipedia. If the advertising system provides relevant ads to the Wiki content&#8211;rather than some annoyingly ridiculous &#8216;shoot the monkey, win a free iPod&#8217; brainless banner, then nothing is lost in Wikipedia&#8217;s compromise for survival and thriving. The knowledge is still free (in every sense of the word), and the founding organization will not only have enough revenue to keep Wikipedia going, they&#8217;ll have enough to make it even better (expanding Wikimedia &#038; other projects).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jean</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/wikipedia-thinking-advertising-google-yahoo-or-who/2721/comment-page-1/#comment-57119</link>
		<dc:creator>Jean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2006 02:32:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=2721#comment-57119</guid>
		<description>Wikipedia &lt;b&gt;NOT&lt;/b&gt; Thinking Advertising now...

Please read updates from Jimmy Wales user talk page
&lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Jimbo_Wales#Say_it_ain.27t_so.2C_Jimbo.21&quot; title=&quot;Say it ain&#039;t so, Jimbo!&quot;&gt;Say it ain&#039;t so, Jimbo!&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt;, Advertising is not what there is on his mind now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wikipedia <b>NOT</b> Thinking Advertising now&#8230;</p>
<p>Please read updates from Jimmy Wales user talk page<br />
<b><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Jimbo_Wales#Say_it_ain.27t_so.2C_Jimbo.21" title="Say it ain't so, Jimbo!">Say it ain&#8217;t so, Jimbo!</a></b>, Advertising is not what there is on his mind now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sfondi cell</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/wikipedia-thinking-advertising-google-yahoo-or-who/2721/comment-page-1/#comment-57106</link>
		<dc:creator>Sfondi cell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2006 00:43:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=2721#comment-57106</guid>
		<description>The wiki was built by a a core of hired guides, I am quite sure the scope is commercial and yes MSN i love it but how does it fit Microsoft own encyclopedia.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The wiki was built by a a core of hired guides, I am quite sure the scope is commercial and yes MSN i love it but how does it fit Microsoft own encyclopedia.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/wikipedia-thinking-advertising-google-yahoo-or-who/2721/comment-page-1/#comment-57081</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2006 21:30:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=2721#comment-57081</guid>
		<description>Go Bill...  I don&#039;t blame anyone &quot;selling out&quot; a little. Even CList charges for some jobs ads....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Go Bill&#8230;  I don&#8217;t blame anyone &#8220;selling out&#8221; a little. Even CList charges for some jobs ads&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MILKI</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/wikipedia-thinking-advertising-google-yahoo-or-who/2721/comment-page-1/#comment-57072</link>
		<dc:creator>MILKI</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2006 20:37:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=2721#comment-57072</guid>
		<description>I WOULD PREFER MSN SINCE THEY SEEM TO DELIVER BETTER ADS. THEY BASE ADS ON AGE GROUPS, SO A 13RD WOULDN&#039;T SEE AN AD FOR MASTERS DEGREE. THEY SHOULD OPT FOR RSS/XML STYLE ADS WHICH DELIVER CONTENT BASED ADS.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I WOULD PREFER MSN SINCE THEY SEEM TO DELIVER BETTER ADS. THEY BASE ADS ON AGE GROUPS, SO A 13RD WOULDN&#8217;T SEE AN AD FOR MASTERS DEGREE. THEY SHOULD OPT FOR RSS/XML STYLE ADS WHICH DELIVER CONTENT BASED ADS.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

