<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wikipedia Better Watch Its Back, Here Comes Google&#160;Knol</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.searchenginejournal.com/wikipedia-better-watch-its-back-here-comes-googles-knol/6108/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/wikipedia-better-watch-its-back-here-comes-googles-knol/6108/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 00:21:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tandem Paragliding</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/wikipedia-better-watch-its-back-here-comes-googles-knol/6108/comment-page-1/#comment-800087</link>
		<dc:creator>Tandem Paragliding</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2007 22:24:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/wikipedia-better-watch-its-back-here-comes-googles-knol/6108/#comment-800087</guid>
		<description>It will be good for Wikipedia to have some competition . I wonder how knol pages will rank compared to wikipedia pages ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It will be good for Wikipedia to have some competition . I wonder how knol pages will rank compared to wikipedia pages ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thorsten</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/wikipedia-better-watch-its-back-here-comes-googles-knol/6108/comment-page-1/#comment-791839</link>
		<dc:creator>Thorsten</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Dec 2007 19:26:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/wikipedia-better-watch-its-back-here-comes-googles-knol/6108/#comment-791839</guid>
		<description>Nice idea, but much to late. I don´t think that wiki editors will move to Google Knol. Another problem is, that the rankings are easy to fake by not very popular articles.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice idea, but much to late. I don´t think that wiki editors will move to Google Knol. Another problem is, that the rankings are easy to fake by not very popular articles.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/wikipedia-better-watch-its-back-here-comes-googles-knol/6108/comment-page-1/#comment-791006</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Dec 2007 18:57:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/wikipedia-better-watch-its-back-here-comes-googles-knol/6108/#comment-791006</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s a good concept. Let everyone write their own article and users can vote the best up to be the authoritative source on a specific topic. It&#039;s a bit like PR. 

I wonder whether Wikipedia will lose it&#039;s preferential rankings once Google decides to let Knol of the leash. Pretty unsexy name btw - Knol...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a good concept. Let everyone write their own article and users can vote the best up to be the authoritative source on a specific topic. It&#8217;s a bit like PR. </p>
<p>I wonder whether Wikipedia will lose it&#8217;s preferential rankings once Google decides to let Knol of the leash. Pretty unsexy name btw &#8211; Knol&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

