Comments on: Wikipedia Article Quality Assessment and Ranking Tips for Users and Search Engine Engineers http://www.searchenginejournal.com/wikipedia-article-quality-assessment-and-ranking-tips-for-users-and-search-engine-engineers/6002/ Wed, 15 Feb 2012 00:21:59 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v= By: Andi http://www.searchenginejournal.com/wikipedia-article-quality-assessment-and-ranking-tips-for-users-and-search-engine-engineers/6002/comment-page-1/#comment-1092112 Andi Wed, 14 Jan 2009 16:11:44 +0000 http://www.searchenginejournal.com/wikipedia-article-quality-assessment-and-ranking-tips-for-users-and-search-engine-engineers/6002/#comment-1092112 This isn't a discussion on what Wikipedia is or isn't. It is however a well written article on how to use Wikipedia effectively and more reliably. If you are irritated by wikipedia, be more specific in searches, or use an advanced search and put wikipedia or wiki in the 'But don't show pages that have' box... simple really :) This isn’t a discussion on what Wikipedia is or isn’t. It is however a well written article on how to use Wikipedia effectively and more reliably.

If you are irritated by wikipedia, be more specific in searches, or use an advanced search and put wikipedia or wiki in the ‘But don’t show pages that have’ box… simple really :)

]]> By: Simlock verwijderen http://www.searchenginejournal.com/wikipedia-article-quality-assessment-and-ranking-tips-for-users-and-search-engine-engineers/6002/comment-page-1/#comment-873664 Simlock verwijderen Wed, 16 Jan 2008 15:25:40 +0000 http://www.searchenginejournal.com/wikipedia-article-quality-assessment-and-ranking-tips-for-users-and-search-engine-engineers/6002/#comment-873664 WikiPedia is only a library, a sort-of enclyclopedy. WikiPedia is only a library, a sort-of enclyclopedy.

]]> By: Choowldyelo http://www.searchenginejournal.com/wikipedia-article-quality-assessment-and-ranking-tips-for-users-and-search-engine-engineers/6002/comment-page-1/#comment-841662 Choowldyelo Tue, 01 Jan 2008 05:54:42 +0000 http://www.searchenginejournal.com/wikipedia-article-quality-assessment-and-ranking-tips-for-users-and-search-engine-engineers/6002/#comment-841662 Hello, I'm new! How are you? Hello,
I’m new! How are you?

]]> By: Igor Berger http://www.searchenginejournal.com/wikipedia-article-quality-assessment-and-ranking-tips-for-users-and-search-engine-engineers/6002/comment-page-1/#comment-789847 Igor Berger Sat, 15 Dec 2007 05:55:49 +0000 http://www.searchenginejournal.com/wikipedia-article-quality-assessment-and-ranking-tips-for-users-and-search-engine-engineers/6002/#comment-789847 WikiPedia is a library nothing more nothing less! WikiPedia is a library nothing more nothing less!

]]> By: Malignant Ignition http://www.searchenginejournal.com/wikipedia-article-quality-assessment-and-ranking-tips-for-users-and-search-engine-engineers/6002/comment-page-1/#comment-789845 Malignant Ignition Sat, 15 Dec 2007 05:49:17 +0000 http://www.searchenginejournal.com/wikipedia-article-quality-assessment-and-ranking-tips-for-users-and-search-engine-engineers/6002/#comment-789845 It is somewhat irritating that Wikipedia pages rank high for very competitive keywords. Wikipedia's costing many webmasters thousands if not more in revenue. It is somewhat irritating that Wikipedia pages rank high for very competitive keywords. Wikipedia’s costing many webmasters thousands if not more in revenue.

]]> By: CarstenCumbrowski http://www.searchenginejournal.com/wikipedia-article-quality-assessment-and-ranking-tips-for-users-and-search-engine-engineers/6002/comment-page-1/#comment-769353 CarstenCumbrowski Fri, 07 Dec 2007 10:59:41 +0000 http://www.searchenginejournal.com/wikipedia-article-quality-assessment-and-ranking-tips-for-users-and-search-engine-engineers/6002/#comment-769353 Thanks Igor. Did you see my recent post? http://www.searchenginejournal.com/how-to-add-content-to-wikipedia-the-white-hat-way/6067/ Thanks Igor. Did you see my recent post?

http://www.searchenginejournal.com/how-to-add-content-to-wikipedia-the-white-hat-way/6067/

]]> By: Igor Berger http://www.searchenginejournal.com/wikipedia-article-quality-assessment-and-ranking-tips-for-users-and-search-engine-engineers/6002/comment-page-1/#comment-768293 Igor Berger Thu, 06 Dec 2007 23:14:57 +0000 http://www.searchenginejournal.com/wikipedia-article-quality-assessment-and-ranking-tips-for-users-and-search-engine-engineers/6002/#comment-768293 Googd job Roy, keep up the good work , in teaching people about Wikipedia. Googd job Roy, keep up the good work , in teaching people about Wikipedia.

]]> By: CarstenCumbrowski http://www.searchenginejournal.com/wikipedia-article-quality-assessment-and-ranking-tips-for-users-and-search-engine-engineers/6002/comment-page-1/#comment-731755 CarstenCumbrowski Fri, 23 Nov 2007 04:25:07 +0000 http://www.searchenginejournal.com/wikipedia-article-quality-assessment-and-ranking-tips-for-users-and-search-engine-engineers/6002/#comment-731755 Thanks Durova. Happy Thanksgiving! Cheers! Thanks Durova. Happy Thanksgiving! Cheers!

]]> By: Durova http://www.searchenginejournal.com/wikipedia-article-quality-assessment-and-ranking-tips-for-users-and-search-engine-engineers/6002/comment-page-1/#comment-731580 Durova Fri, 23 Nov 2007 00:40:48 +0000 http://www.searchenginejournal.com/wikipedia-article-quality-assessment-and-ranking-tips-for-users-and-search-engine-engineers/6002/#comment-731580 That's a good dissection of basic Wikipedia article anatomy. Well researched with sharp image use. I like it, Carsten. Cheers. That’s a good dissection of basic Wikipedia article anatomy. Well researched with sharp image use. I like it, Carsten. Cheers.

]]>