Comments on: Why Search Sucks/ Why Search Rocks http://www.searchenginejournal.com/why-search-sucks-why-search-rocks/4704/ Tue, 14 Feb 2012 17:43:21 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v= By: Raj Dash http://www.searchenginejournal.com/why-search-sucks-why-search-rocks/4704/comment-page-1/#comment-451059 Raj Dash Tue, 24 Apr 2007 05:24:46 +0000 http://www.searchenginejournal.com/why-search-sucks-why-search-rocks/4704/#comment-451059 @Carl: Thanks for the tip. I'm finding a lot of fascinating new search paradigms being used, and no doubt we'll continue to see more. @Carl: Thanks for the tip. I’m finding a lot of fascinating new search paradigms being used, and no doubt we’ll continue to see more.

]]> By: Carl Williams http://www.searchenginejournal.com/why-search-sucks-why-search-rocks/4704/comment-page-1/#comment-446424 Carl Williams Tue, 17 Apr 2007 15:25:19 +0000 http://www.searchenginejournal.com/why-search-sucks-why-search-rocks/4704/#comment-446424 Search engine can be frustrating to use, especially Google- who I call the mafia of the internet. If you are looking for an alternative, try Quintura. We reviewed it last week. Check it out at our company blog: http://www.odinjobs.com/blogs/page/thatsinteresting Search engine can be frustrating to use, especially Google- who I call the mafia of the internet. If you are looking for an alternative, try Quintura. We reviewed it last week. Check it out at our company blog: http://www.odinjobs.com/blogs/page/thatsinteresting

]]> By: Raj Dash http://www.searchenginejournal.com/why-search-sucks-why-search-rocks/4704/comment-page-1/#comment-443506 Raj Dash Fri, 13 Apr 2007 17:44:30 +0000 http://www.searchenginejournal.com/why-search-sucks-why-search-rocks/4704/#comment-443506 @Jaan: Good point. I didn't want to get too complex with the diagram. NY Times is an example of one of those sites that are both visible and invisible, depending on which version of the URL you use for a story, etc. @Jaan: Good point. I didn’t want to get too complex with the diagram. NY Times is an example of one of those sites that are both visible and invisible, depending on which version of the URL you use for a story, etc.

]]> By: Jaan Kanellis http://www.searchenginejournal.com/why-search-sucks-why-search-rocks/4704/comment-page-1/#comment-443502 Jaan Kanellis Fri, 13 Apr 2007 17:40:05 +0000 http://www.searchenginejournal.com/why-search-sucks-why-search-rocks/4704/#comment-443502 Aren't we seeing the subscription web appear often in the SERPs? NY Times for example? I would assume that would fall into part of the visible web, yet at the same time invisible without paying....:( Aren’t we seeing the subscription web appear often in the SERPs? NY Times for example? I would assume that would fall into part of the visible web, yet at the same time invisible without paying….:(

]]> By: Raj Dash http://www.searchenginejournal.com/why-search-sucks-why-search-rocks/4704/comment-page-1/#comment-443323 Raj Dash Fri, 13 Apr 2007 14:01:34 +0000 http://www.searchenginejournal.com/why-search-sucks-why-search-rocks/4704/#comment-443323 @Brandon: I don't honestly know. Maybe it's the diagram. I'll have to test the next post. Thanks for bringing it to our attention. @Brandon: I don’t honestly know. Maybe it’s the diagram. I’ll have to test the next post. Thanks for bringing it to our attention.

]]> By: brandon http://www.searchenginejournal.com/why-search-sucks-why-search-rocks/4704/comment-page-1/#comment-443317 brandon Fri, 13 Apr 2007 13:55:29 +0000 http://www.searchenginejournal.com/why-search-sucks-why-search-rocks/4704/#comment-443317 why is the page shifted to the left ? ps. im on ie6 why is the page shifted to the left ?
ps. im on ie6

]]> By: Raj Dash http://www.searchenginejournal.com/why-search-sucks-why-search-rocks/4704/comment-page-1/#comment-443286 Raj Dash Fri, 13 Apr 2007 12:50:05 +0000 http://www.searchenginejournal.com/why-search-sucks-why-search-rocks/4704/#comment-443286 @Rajesh: Thanks. It's not completely accurate, but I had a hard time express the intersections of social bookmarking and web 2.0. Maybe I need to re-look at the article Charles pointed above. @Rajesh: Thanks. It’s not completely accurate, but I had a hard time express the intersections of social bookmarking and web 2.0. Maybe I need to re-look at the article Charles pointed above.

]]> By: Rajesh Kumar http://www.searchenginejournal.com/why-search-sucks-why-search-rocks/4704/comment-page-1/#comment-443277 Rajesh Kumar Fri, 13 Apr 2007 12:29:52 +0000 http://www.searchenginejournal.com/why-search-sucks-why-search-rocks/4704/#comment-443277 Very interesting. I like the diagram. Very interesting. I like the diagram.

]]> By: Raj Dash http://www.searchenginejournal.com/why-search-sucks-why-search-rocks/4704/comment-page-1/#comment-442908 Raj Dash Thu, 12 Apr 2007 23:16:19 +0000 http://www.searchenginejournal.com/why-search-sucks-why-search-rocks/4704/#comment-442908 @Charles: Yes, I have seen it but had forgotten. Thanks for reminding me. @Charles: Yes, I have seen it but had forgotten. Thanks for reminding me.

]]> By: Charles Knight http://www.searchenginejournal.com/why-search-sucks-why-search-rocks/4704/comment-page-1/#comment-442879 Charles Knight Thu, 12 Apr 2007 22:13:44 +0000 http://www.searchenginejournal.com/why-search-sucks-why-search-rocks/4704/#comment-442879 Raj, Have you seen the whole list of 100 Alternative Search Engines on Read/WriteWeb? It's here: http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/top_100_alternative_search_engines_mar07.php Raj,

Have you seen the whole list of 100 Alternative Search Engines on Read/WriteWeb? It’s here:

http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/top_100_alternative_search_engines_mar07.php

]]>