<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 5 Reasons Why Link Building through Guest Posts is Bad&#160;Strategy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.searchenginejournal.com/why-link-building-guest-posts-is-bad-strategy/17586/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/why-link-building-guest-posts-is-bad-strategy/17586/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 17:43:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ivan</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/why-link-building-guest-posts-is-bad-strategy/17586/comment-page-1/#comment-1271522</link>
		<dc:creator>ivan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 May 2010 19:13:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=17586#comment-1271522</guid>
		<description>u have no freaking clue what you&#039;re talking about. Do some SEO before writing about SEO.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>u have no freaking clue what you&#39;re talking about. Do some SEO before writing about SEO.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ivan</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/why-link-building-guest-posts-is-bad-strategy/17586/comment-page-1/#comment-1257614</link>
		<dc:creator>ivan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 May 2010 14:13:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=17586#comment-1257614</guid>
		<description>u have no freaking clue what you&#039;re talking about. Do some SEO before writing about SEO.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>u have no freaking clue what you&#39;re talking about. Do some SEO before writing about SEO.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave G</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/why-link-building-guest-posts-is-bad-strategy/17586/comment-page-1/#comment-1199792</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave G</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 05:30:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=17586#comment-1199792</guid>
		<description>In my view the 5 listed points are algo chasing nonsense. I disagree that the those points would hurt a guest post on a decently ranked blog page, even a so-called semantically irrelevant post.

If a page rank 6 technology blog has a post about mens&#039; dress shirts  (and a clean link out to the shirt guy) are you telling me the engines are going to penalize the link? I don&#039;t buy it. That would contradict the whole premise of page rank, which is Google&#039;s determination of the value (and implicit trust) of the host blog page.

A straight  link out of a highly rank page gets juice. A link from a lowly page doesn&#039;t matter. The rest is just arrhythmic long tail.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In my view the 5 listed points are algo chasing nonsense. I disagree that the those points would hurt a guest post on a decently ranked blog page, even a so-called semantically irrelevant post.</p>
<p>If a page rank 6 technology blog has a post about mens&#8217; dress shirts  (and a clean link out to the shirt guy) are you telling me the engines are going to penalize the link? I don&#8217;t buy it. That would contradict the whole premise of page rank, which is Google&#8217;s determination of the value (and implicit trust) of the host blog page.</p>
<p>A straight  link out of a highly rank page gets juice. A link from a lowly page doesn&#8217;t matter. The rest is just arrhythmic long tail.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: @HRMargo</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/why-link-building-guest-posts-is-bad-strategy/17586/comment-page-1/#comment-1199688</link>
		<dc:creator>@HRMargo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 02:35:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=17586#comment-1199688</guid>
		<description>I chuckled when I read your post.  It&#039;s interesting when the comments are as compelling as the post.  I think your critics are being just a little too hard on you.  You&#039;ve made some good points here, and deserve praise, not braze.  So there snarky commenters.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I chuckled when I read your post.  It&#8217;s interesting when the comments are as compelling as the post.  I think your critics are being just a little too hard on you.  You&#8217;ve made some good points here, and deserve praise, not braze.  So there snarky commenters.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kenny</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/why-link-building-guest-posts-is-bad-strategy/17586/comment-page-1/#comment-1199355</link>
		<dc:creator>Kenny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 18:11:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=17586#comment-1199355</guid>
		<description>I enjoyed the article - catchy title, and then I kept reading to the end and had to laugh at the humor.  
And Danny did succeed in creating some dialogue in the comments.  
It&#039;s all in what you take away from the experience.
I feel like I want to buy a new shirt.  :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I enjoyed the article &#8211; catchy title, and then I kept reading to the end and had to laugh at the humor.<br />
And Danny did succeed in creating some dialogue in the comments.<br />
It&#8217;s all in what you take away from the experience.<br />
I feel like I want to buy a new shirt.  :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gerald Weber</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/why-link-building-guest-posts-is-bad-strategy/17586/comment-page-1/#comment-1197248</link>
		<dc:creator>Gerald Weber</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 03:42:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=17586#comment-1197248</guid>
		<description>You are now contradicting yourself. Your point in the post was that guest blogging is not an effective link building strategy if the host site is an SEO blog written by a blogger that sells T shirts. Now you are saying it&#039;s an effective strategy. 

Not trying to bust your balls or anything but you should have thought that one through a bit more.

Let me just say you would never catch me guest posting on a blog about men&#039;s fashion. Being as I&#039;m an SEO. ;-) It just doesn&#039;t make sense.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are now contradicting yourself. Your point in the post was that guest blogging is not an effective link building strategy if the host site is an SEO blog written by a blogger that sells T shirts. Now you are saying it&#8217;s an effective strategy. </p>
<p>Not trying to bust your balls or anything but you should have thought that one through a bit more.</p>
<p>Let me just say you would never catch me guest posting on a blog about men&#8217;s fashion. Being as I&#8217;m an SEO. ;-) It just doesn&#8217;t make sense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arnie K</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/why-link-building-guest-posts-is-bad-strategy/17586/comment-page-1/#comment-1195963</link>
		<dc:creator>Arnie K</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 21:10:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=17586#comment-1195963</guid>
		<description>Agree, I think this &quot;guest Post&quot; slipped through the editorial cracks at SEJ.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agree, I think this &#8220;guest Post&#8221; slipped through the editorial cracks at SEJ.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Danny Wong</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/why-link-building-guest-posts-is-bad-strategy/17586/comment-page-1/#comment-1195366</link>
		<dc:creator>Danny Wong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 03:43:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=17586#comment-1195366</guid>
		<description>Gerald, 

Links from high-PR websites, regardless of relevance add SEO power to your website.

Consider the logic this way.... the President recommends you purchase Steaks from the Butcher on Lexington St. You, and whoever else received the message would take that as a positive referral. Obama isn&#039;t a Steak expert (well, maybe he is, but let&#039;s say he wasn&#039;t), but because he&#039;s an &#039;authority&#039; figure you&#039;d be more trusting of the Butcher on Lexington.

Same case here. SEJ is an authority in cyberspace, specifically in SEO, but because SEJ is an authority, the link I receive from SEJ is like a positive referral to Blank Label (in the eyes of Google), even though we&#039;re in separate areas in cyberspace.

I mean, wouldn&#039;t you love to have a backlink from a PR9 website, even if it&#039;s content was about diapers? I&#039;m fairly confident that you&#039;d be more than ecstatic to have a website of that caliber linking to you, and that Google would see that as a positive &#039;vote.&#039;

I meant to write this post to stir up more critical thinking on the logic behind Google&#039;s Search algo. While my points might not have the strongest arguments, they are a starter for deeper conversation.

Cheers,
Danny</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gerald, </p>
<p>Links from high-PR websites, regardless of relevance add SEO power to your website.</p>
<p>Consider the logic this way&#8230;. the President recommends you purchase Steaks from the Butcher on Lexington St. You, and whoever else received the message would take that as a positive referral. Obama isn&#8217;t a Steak expert (well, maybe he is, but let&#8217;s say he wasn&#8217;t), but because he&#8217;s an &#8216;authority&#8217; figure you&#8217;d be more trusting of the Butcher on Lexington.</p>
<p>Same case here. SEJ is an authority in cyberspace, specifically in SEO, but because SEJ is an authority, the link I receive from SEJ is like a positive referral to Blank Label (in the eyes of Google), even though we&#8217;re in separate areas in cyberspace.</p>
<p>I mean, wouldn&#8217;t you love to have a backlink from a PR9 website, even if it&#8217;s content was about diapers? I&#8217;m fairly confident that you&#8217;d be more than ecstatic to have a website of that caliber linking to you, and that Google would see that as a positive &#8216;vote.&#8217;</p>
<p>I meant to write this post to stir up more critical thinking on the logic behind Google&#8217;s Search algo. While my points might not have the strongest arguments, they are a starter for deeper conversation.</p>
<p>Cheers,<br />
Danny</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gerald Weber</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/why-link-building-guest-posts-is-bad-strategy/17586/comment-page-1/#comment-1195361</link>
		<dc:creator>Gerald Weber</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 03:36:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=17586#comment-1195361</guid>
		<description>Oh I get it now!

#2 you were talking about yourself. LOL

&lt;blockquote&gt;the guest posts are not always on domains that are relevant to what your website is all about (i.e. im posting on an SEO website, when my company makes custom men’s dress shirts)&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&lt;em&gt;This post was written by Danny Wong the Lead Evangelist for Blank Label, a provider of custom dress shirts consumers design with Blank Label’s virtual dress shirt design app.&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh I get it now!</p>
<p>#2 you were talking about yourself. LOL</p>
<blockquote><p>the guest posts are not always on domains that are relevant to what your website is all about (i.e. im posting on an SEO website, when my company makes custom men’s dress shirts)</p></blockquote>
<p><em>This post was written by Danny Wong the Lead Evangelist for Blank Label, a provider of custom dress shirts consumers design with Blank Label’s virtual dress shirt design app.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gerald Weber</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/why-link-building-guest-posts-is-bad-strategy/17586/comment-page-1/#comment-1195357</link>
		<dc:creator>Gerald Weber</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 03:26:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=17586#comment-1195357</guid>
		<description>While I agree that guest posting shouldn&#039;t be used only for link building purposes I&#039;m going to have to go ahead and disagree with most of your points here. I&#039;ll just explain on a couple.

&lt;blockquote&gt;# Website Semantic Irrelevance – the guest posts are not always on domains that are relevant to what your website is all about (i.e. im posting on an SEO website, when my company makes custom men’s dress shirts)&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Why the hell would you be posting on an SEO website if your company makes men&#039;s dress shirts? Does anyone really do this?

That would be an example of irrelevance but I don&#039;t think many intelligent bloggers would do this.

&lt;blockquote&gt;# It’s a Cheap Tactic – with good copy, and decent knowledge of a certain space, it’s not hard to guest post anywhere. Google may see this as a cheap tactic because of how easy it is for an SEO to guest post on a high-PR blog without that post being an unbiased editorial or mention of your company&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I have to disagree 100% here. If a bloggers takes the time to write a quality piece of original content that is useful and relevant, that is hardly considered a cheap tactic and I doubt Google view this as a cheap tactic either.

&lt;blockquote&gt;# Duplicate Content Complications – the byline with your self-serving links might be seen as ‘duplicate content’ (if you copy and paste your signatures for guest posts) that was plugged into all these other websites, therefore devaluing the links’ power. But this can be easily resolved by creating a unique byline each time which takes little to no effor&lt;/blockquote&gt;

This is a far shot. There is such a thing as duplicate content filter but there is no evidence I have ever seen that the same or similar byline takes away from the effectiveness of the link juice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While I agree that guest posting shouldn&#8217;t be used only for link building purposes I&#8217;m going to have to go ahead and disagree with most of your points here. I&#8217;ll just explain on a couple.</p>
<blockquote><p># Website Semantic Irrelevance – the guest posts are not always on domains that are relevant to what your website is all about (i.e. im posting on an SEO website, when my company makes custom men’s dress shirts)</p></blockquote>
<p>Why the hell would you be posting on an SEO website if your company makes men&#8217;s dress shirts? Does anyone really do this?</p>
<p>That would be an example of irrelevance but I don&#8217;t think many intelligent bloggers would do this.</p>
<blockquote><p># It’s a Cheap Tactic – with good copy, and decent knowledge of a certain space, it’s not hard to guest post anywhere. Google may see this as a cheap tactic because of how easy it is for an SEO to guest post on a high-PR blog without that post being an unbiased editorial or mention of your company</p></blockquote>
<p>I have to disagree 100% here. If a bloggers takes the time to write a quality piece of original content that is useful and relevant, that is hardly considered a cheap tactic and I doubt Google view this as a cheap tactic either.</p>
<blockquote><p># Duplicate Content Complications – the byline with your self-serving links might be seen as ‘duplicate content’ (if you copy and paste your signatures for guest posts) that was plugged into all these other websites, therefore devaluing the links’ power. But this can be easily resolved by creating a unique byline each time which takes little to no effor</p></blockquote>
<p>This is a far shot. There is such a thing as duplicate content filter but there is no evidence I have ever seen that the same or similar byline takes away from the effectiveness of the link juice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

