Comments on: Want a More Organized Search Results? Google Square It

By: Nair Satheesh

Nair Satheesh — Thu, 20 Aug 2009 16:58:53 +0000

Google Squared appears to be similar to my patent application:

Frankly, I am getting a Déjà vu effect while going through the “Google Squared” application because it appears to be very similar in function to my United States patent application which was filed on April 12, 2007 and as publicly disclosed by the United States Patent and Trademark Office on October 16, 2008, when the patent application was published.

My patent application is titled as “Method And System For Research Using Computer Based Simultaneous Comparison And Contrasting Of A Multiplicity Of Subjects Having Specific Attributes Within Specific Contexts” bearing Document Number “20080256023” and Inventor name “Nair Satheesh” which may be viewed at http://patft.uspto.gov/ upon Patent Applications: Quick Search.

Google Squared appears to be using at least some if not many of the same methods and systems as set forth by me more than two years ago in my patent application. In fact there are many more methods and systems disclosed in my patent application which I believe will help resolve certain inaccuracies found in current Google Squared application.

I have issued legal notices to Google through my Patent Attorney in the US but Google has not responded yet to any of my notices.

By: Tag44

Tag44 — Tue, 09 Jun 2009 12:28:45 +0000

Thanks Arnold, thanks for the post and for the useful information, keep it up..:)

By: Find Tips

Find Tips — Sat, 06 Jun 2009 22:25:03 +0000

I coudn’t agree more Patricia. There’s something about simplicity that has always been very appealing to me personally. While other engines crowd their homepages, Google has always managed to keep things relatively uncluttered. I hope this doesn’t start changing or I’ll be looking elsewhere for search.

By: Patricia Skinner

Patricia Skinner — Fri, 05 Jun 2009 19:39:07 +0000

All things considered, I think I’d rather stick with ordinary, common or garden Google, and try out Bing for comparison: all this exotic stuff does make it rather complicated. Thanks for the explanation though Arnold–at least I know what I’m missing. :)

By: Alan Bleiweiss

Alan Bleiweiss — Fri, 05 Jun 2009 05:52:34 +0000

Google Squared is like Cuill meets Wolfram Alpha or, for us urbanites, google on Crack

My results for anything I would normally search were totally off kilter. Some brought back completely irrelevant info

Totally a useless resource for all but a small slice of the world, I just don’t know who that slice would be since it’s completely wacked.

And as Svetlana ( @Profy ) found, G^2 thinks living people are dead. http://bit.ly/EboxA

By: Tom Gibbs

Tom Gibbs — Thu, 04 Jun 2009 19:34:29 +0000

This should come in handy for search engine optimizing your website or blog.

By: Stephan Miller

Stephan Miller — Thu, 04 Jun 2009 15:02:10 +0000

Google has really been giving away the keys to the kingdom lately with this, related searches and Wonder Wheel. A lot of good tools for SEO’s.

By: Noodle Squares

Noodle Squares — Thu, 04 Jun 2009 14:34:08 +0000

The G^2 results rarely make any sense. This kind of thing still needs to have some human intelligence mixed in; compare with Noodle Squares.com that is part human intelligence and part automated. Compare:

Cameras
http://www.google.com/squared/search?q=cameras
http://noodlesquares.com/Cameras.html

[disclaimer: associated with noodlesquares]