Comments on: V7N Contextual Links : Link Buying Service for SEO & Bloggers

By: Methew

Methew — Thu, 28 Feb 2008 12:56:51 +0000

I offer directory submission service.

Can you provide me 6 permanent contextual links from 6 different websites or blogs (seo friendly) in $100 (max budget) related to seo, sem, internet marketing ?

When I say a contextual link, I mean that It should be crawlable by google and other search engines, it should not be blocked. It should be in between a paragraph which talk about manual directory submission service and have a anchor text as “manual directory submission service” to our website. And the website or blog should be (SEO/SEM) theme. It should pass value to my site by
google. Also If it is a blog post, it should not have word like review, sponsor, sponsored, advertisement, ad etc since it looks like paid review or advertisement.

I require it urgently by next 3-4 hours only. If delayed, maximum by tomorrow morning it should be delivered. I do not have more budget than this ($100 for 6 contextual links) and if possible from different class c ip.

If you can, let me know the url from where you will give a contextual text link (do follow) and position on that page as well so that I can decide and let you know immediately.

Regards
Mathew Barclay
mathewbarclay@gmail.com

By: John Scott

John Scott — Thu, 15 Feb 2007 01:19:57 +0000

No, none were paid. But thank you for making my point, that most of what people say on blogs is based upon absolute bullshit conjecture.

By: Hornswaggled

Hornswaggled — Wed, 31 Jan 2007 17:41:33 +0000

iwebtools is paid. That post was nonsense btw.

I dont have any problem with PPP or reviewme, I know people who are using it to target bloggers directly and market to them. The search engines are a secondary incentive but not the main one.

PPP sucks as that its filled with spam blog sites, Reviewme sucks in that it takes forever to find and order a review. Right now there is not a site that is doing this correctly for advertisers, maybe bloggers but not advertisers. Creamaid and blogitive are out there, haven’t tried them though.

People you need to keep the advertisers happy otherwise the money will dry up. There is still a need for a better service.

By: John Scott

John Scott — Fri, 26 Jan 2007 02:01:37 +0000

“Probably because they were detected.”

http://www.v7n.com/forums/v7-inc-support-forum/46682-undetectable.html

If you think they are detectable, then detect which link on this page is paid:

http://www.seo-herald.com/2007/01/pagerank_vs_pepsi.html

Only one of those links is paid.

Ok, ok, two are.

Nope, three are.

Nope, none are.

They are undetectable as paid because they are placed as organic links would be. The only way to discover that they are not organic would be to access my PayPal account.

By: Loren Baker, Editor

Loren Baker, Editor — Thu, 25 Jan 2007 21:29:29 +0000

Brian,

On the other side of the coin, I have some older blog posts which attract thousands of users on a monthly basis.

If someone were to pay me (the hypothetical me) for links in those blog posts to relevant services or businesses, I’d say that in the same way that traditional link buying works, those ads would pay for themselves for the advertiser AND continue to bring in more traffic and revenue over the lifetime of those blog posts.

Not to say that I would pimp out links in old high traffic posts for $10 a pop (on the publisher side), but I’m sure that there is more to benefit from in terms of link advertising, within any link network or directory, than just ‘Google/Yahoo/MSN Juice’

By: Dread Pirate Robert

Dread Pirate Robert — Thu, 25 Jan 2007 20:37:17 +0000

Hey, that was fast. That “/why.php” has been changed and no longer claims their links are undetectable. Probably because they were detected.

By: Andrea

Andrea — Thu, 25 Jan 2007 17:52:48 +0000

Wouldn’t it be easy for someone at Google to purchase links and from there put together a list of those blogs for which outbound links should be devalued?

By: Brian

Brian — Thu, 25 Jan 2007 16:57:35 +0000

If you know even a little about search you know this is total BS!

By: Sam

Sam — Thu, 25 Jan 2007 13:29:34 +0000

Hey, Loren it wasn’t that bad, it was close to. It happens sometime, need not to worry. I must say you are doing a great job. I love to visit your blogs. Gives me great, authentic information.

What John G is saying is quite tricky, will love to hear more on this. Thanks

By: John Gall

John Gall — Wed, 24 Jan 2007 22:13:28 +0000

With the high speed nature of change as it relates to SEO and the SERPS I don’t see how anyone can claim anything is “undetectable.” Eventually all thigs get detected.