<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: URLs and SEO: Various Strategies for URL File&#160;Names</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.searchenginejournal.com/urls-and-seo/16417/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/urls-and-seo/16417/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 03:49:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: balls</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/urls-and-seo/16417/comment-page-1/#comment-1270968</link>
		<dc:creator>balls</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Apr 2010 03:10:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=16417#comment-1270968</guid>
		<description>So Website URL &quot;SPAMMERS&quot; never use hyphens to separate words? Only periods and commas? This seems like a fabricated reason not to use other unreserved characters as word separators.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So Website URL &#8220;SPAMMERS&#8221; never use hyphens to separate words? Only periods and commas? This seems like a fabricated reason not to use other unreserved characters as word separators.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: balls</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/urls-and-seo/16417/comment-page-1/#comment-1239286</link>
		<dc:creator>balls</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Apr 2010 22:10:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=16417#comment-1239286</guid>
		<description>So Website URL &quot;SPAMMERS&quot; never use hyphens to separate words? Only periods and commas? This seems like a fabricated reason not to use other unreserved characters as word separators.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So Website URL &#8220;SPAMMERS&#8221; never use hyphens to separate words? Only periods and commas? This seems like a fabricated reason not to use other unreserved characters as word separators.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shack</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/urls-and-seo/16417/comment-page-1/#comment-1185617</link>
		<dc:creator>Shack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 22:57:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=16417#comment-1185617</guid>
		<description>I am about a month into SEO, inactive for a number of years, so I appologize for my lack of recent knowledge.

You may have answered this, but is it a SEO negative to use a database driven dynamically configured site with links like
www.something.com/shop?cat=432?  

If so, I can redirect which is easy, but causes other problems(double click back and others), or rewrite the ASP for our major landing pages to be pages with out the arguments(a pain but doable).

What do you suggest?

Thanks/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am about a month into SEO, inactive for a number of years, so I appologize for my lack of recent knowledge.</p>
<p>You may have answered this, but is it a SEO negative to use a database driven dynamically configured site with links like<br />
<a href="http://www.something.com/shop?cat=432?" rel="nofollow">http://www.something.com/shop?cat=432?</a>  </p>
<p>If so, I can redirect which is easy, but causes other problems(double click back and others), or rewrite the ASP for our major landing pages to be pages with out the arguments(a pain but doable).</p>
<p>What do you suggest?</p>
<p>Thanks/</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barrie</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/urls-and-seo/16417/comment-page-1/#comment-1184407</link>
		<dc:creator>Barrie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 16:51:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=16417#comment-1184407</guid>
		<description>&quot;seeing an .htlm&quot;? ;)

Good article, as always Ann</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;seeing an .htlm&#8221;? ;)</p>
<p>Good article, as always Ann</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SEO Agentur</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/urls-and-seo/16417/comment-page-1/#comment-1184299</link>
		<dc:creator>SEO Agentur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 10:23:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=16417#comment-1184299</guid>
		<description>although obvious and well known, thanx for bringing it to the point again!

Regards
Nico</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>although obvious and well known, thanx for bringing it to the point again!</p>
<p>Regards<br />
Nico</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chameleon Copywriter</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/urls-and-seo/16417/comment-page-1/#comment-1183242</link>
		<dc:creator>Chameleon Copywriter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 11:26:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=16417#comment-1183242</guid>
		<description>Good article, it&#039;s always good to remark the importance of the URL structure. It is worth to spend few minutes thinking about the keywords we want to use in url, as they really affect results in SERP.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good article, it&#8217;s always good to remark the importance of the URL structure. It is worth to spend few minutes thinking about the keywords we want to use in url, as they really affect results in SERP.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven van Vessum</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/urls-and-seo/16417/comment-page-1/#comment-1183223</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven van Vessum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 10:46:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=16417#comment-1183223</guid>
		<description>Good article Ann. Especially the point about case-sensitive URL&#039;s. Not a lot of people know about that, but using Google Webmaster Tools --&gt; Diagnosis --&gt; HTML suggestions you&#039;ll find out soon enough if you&#039;ve got any duplicate content because of that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good article Ann. Especially the point about case-sensitive URL&#8217;s. Not a lot of people know about that, but using Google Webmaster Tools &#8211;&gt; Diagnosis &#8211;&gt; HTML suggestions you&#8217;ll find out soon enough if you&#8217;ve got any duplicate content because of that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arrow SEO</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/urls-and-seo/16417/comment-page-1/#comment-1182995</link>
		<dc:creator>Arrow SEO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jan 2010 23:05:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=16417#comment-1182995</guid>
		<description>The space separator is the worst to use in filenames. Its good to know hyphens are SEO friendly and looks better as well. Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The space separator is the worst to use in filenames. Its good to know hyphens are SEO friendly and looks better as well. Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/urls-and-seo/16417/comment-page-1/#comment-1182961</link>
		<dc:creator>Don</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jan 2010 22:35:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=16417#comment-1182961</guid>
		<description>Ann, I see a lot of sites adding an extra subdirectory in the URL structure to get in a primary keyword.  Do you find that root/keyword/topic.html much better than root/topic.html?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ann, I see a lot of sites adding an extra subdirectory in the URL structure to get in a primary keyword.  Do you find that root/keyword/topic.html much better than root/topic.html?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ann Smarty</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/urls-and-seo/16417/comment-page-1/#comment-1182947</link>
		<dc:creator>Ann Smarty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jan 2010 21:37:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=16417#comment-1182947</guid>
		<description>Right you are! edited the table</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Right you are! edited the table</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

