<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Update : Blogging Prize Now Over $10,000 in Search Marketing&#160;Services</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.searchenginejournal.com/update-blogging-prize-now-over-10000-in-search-marketing-services/6688/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/update-blogging-prize-now-over-10000-in-search-marketing-services/6688/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 00:21:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ogs</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/update-blogging-prize-now-over-10000-in-search-marketing-services/6688/comment-page-1/#comment-1073857</link>
		<dc:creator>ogs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Apr 2008 22:25:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/update-blogging-prize-now-over-10000-in-search-marketing-services/6688/#comment-1073857</guid>
		<description>Traffic should NOT be a consideration - only quality.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Traffic should NOT be a consideration &#8211; only quality.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: charles sarjeant</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/update-blogging-prize-now-over-10000-in-search-marketing-services/6688/comment-page-1/#comment-1073239</link>
		<dc:creator>charles sarjeant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Apr 2008 00:50:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/update-blogging-prize-now-over-10000-in-search-marketing-services/6688/#comment-1073239</guid>
		<description>Dear frend, do you or anyone you know 
have cancer, or HIV/AIDS?

If your answer is yes,  then you should click on the link and start reading up on this fantastic new product.

It will change your life forever.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear frend, do you or anyone you know<br />
have cancer, or HIV/AIDS?</p>
<p>If your answer is yes,  then you should click on the link and start reading up on this fantastic new product.</p>
<p>It will change your life forever.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hans</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/update-blogging-prize-now-over-10000-in-search-marketing-services/6688/comment-page-1/#comment-1073195</link>
		<dc:creator>Hans</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 16:46:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/update-blogging-prize-now-over-10000-in-search-marketing-services/6688/#comment-1073195</guid>
		<description>Do we need to submit the article in a particular format? Simple text? Doc? HTML?

Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do we need to submit the article in a particular format? Simple text? Doc? HTML?</p>
<p>Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Loren Baker, Editor</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/update-blogging-prize-now-over-10000-in-search-marketing-services/6688/comment-page-1/#comment-1073187</link>
		<dc:creator>Loren Baker, Editor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 16:24:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/update-blogging-prize-now-over-10000-in-search-marketing-services/6688/#comment-1073187</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ll look into this and add a human touch to the overall judging.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll look into this and add a human touch to the overall judging.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gyutae Park</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/update-blogging-prize-now-over-10000-in-search-marketing-services/6688/comment-page-1/#comment-1073175</link>
		<dc:creator>Gyutae Park</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 14:41:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/update-blogging-prize-now-over-10000-in-search-marketing-services/6688/#comment-1073175</guid>
		<description>Perhaps a panel of judges to complement the voting would be a good idea?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps a panel of judges to complement the voting would be a good idea?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gyutae Park</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/update-blogging-prize-now-over-10000-in-search-marketing-services/6688/comment-page-1/#comment-1073174</link>
		<dc:creator>Gyutae Park</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 14:40:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/update-blogging-prize-now-over-10000-in-search-marketing-services/6688/#comment-1073174</guid>
		<description>I agree with the first commenter in that the system is likely to be gamed.  I recently ran a pretty big contest at WinningtheWeb.com with over $14,000 in prizes and I discovered that people will go to great lengths when real incentives are involved.

I&#039;m not saying that this contest will be a major flop - in fact, I will probably enter myself.  However, there is a big risk that the voting system will be gamed, a winner will be selected &quot;unfairly&quot;, and a big uproar stirred up here on SEJ.  Not an impossible situation since the rules are a bit ambiguous.

Nevertheless, great idea.  Good luck!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with the first commenter in that the system is likely to be gamed.  I recently ran a pretty big contest at WinningtheWeb.com with over $14,000 in prizes and I discovered that people will go to great lengths when real incentives are involved.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not saying that this contest will be a major flop &#8211; in fact, I will probably enter myself.  However, there is a big risk that the voting system will be gamed, a winner will be selected &#8220;unfairly&#8221;, and a big uproar stirred up here on SEJ.  Not an impossible situation since the rules are a bit ambiguous.</p>
<p>Nevertheless, great idea.  Good luck!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Search Engine Optimization Journal</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/update-blogging-prize-now-over-10000-in-search-marketing-services/6688/comment-page-1/#comment-1073132</link>
		<dc:creator>Search Engine Optimization Journal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 17:06:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/update-blogging-prize-now-over-10000-in-search-marketing-services/6688/#comment-1073132</guid>
		<description>Sounds like a decent contest - love the prize ideas but the last commenter DOES have some good points.  It may just be one big popularity contest in the end.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sounds like a decent contest &#8211; love the prize ideas but the last commenter DOES have some good points.  It may just be one big popularity contest in the end.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SearcH◆ EngineS WEB</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/update-blogging-prize-now-over-10000-in-search-marketing-services/6688/comment-page-1/#comment-1073130</link>
		<dc:creator>SearcH◆ EngineS WEB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 16:14:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/update-blogging-prize-now-over-10000-in-search-marketing-services/6688/#comment-1073130</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;/// &lt;i&gt;4. Judging of the articles will be a multi-tier process looking at social media voting, reader voting, traffic of the individual posts and links to the posts. The voting will be measured 2 weeks after the initial publishing date.
SEJ user voting at post level + Stumbles + Comments + Sphinns + Diggs + Unique Users + Page Views (Google Analytics) + Mixx Votes + Incoming Links (as measured by Yahoo) = Final Tally &lt;/i&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&lt;b&gt;This is the absolute WORST thing you could have done&lt;/b&gt;

Just saying you do not &#039;encourage&#039; people to game the system, will have absolutely NO effect (duh)

Traffic should NOT be a consideration - only quality.

People WILL game the system because of the publicity they will receive from being a winner and well as the backlinks!

They may buy votes using those new services designed to promote a submission on social networks....

They may even solicit top members to advocate for them...

They will buy backlinks and use other gray hat tactics....

What started off as a good idea with tons of potential, will now be ruined due to ambition</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>/// <i>4. Judging of the articles will be a multi-tier process looking at social media voting, reader voting, traffic of the individual posts and links to the posts. The voting will be measured 2 weeks after the initial publishing date.<br />
SEJ user voting at post level + Stumbles + Comments + Sphinns + Diggs + Unique Users + Page Views (Google Analytics) + Mixx Votes + Incoming Links (as measured by Yahoo) = Final Tally </i></p></blockquote>
<p><b>This is the absolute WORST thing you could have done</b></p>
<p>Just saying you do not &#8216;encourage&#8217; people to game the system, will have absolutely NO effect (duh)</p>
<p>Traffic should NOT be a consideration &#8211; only quality.</p>
<p>People WILL game the system because of the publicity they will receive from being a winner and well as the backlinks!</p>
<p>They may buy votes using those new services designed to promote a submission on social networks&#8230;.</p>
<p>They may even solicit top members to advocate for them&#8230;</p>
<p>They will buy backlinks and use other gray hat tactics&#8230;.</p>
<p>What started off as a good idea with tons of potential, will now be ruined due to ambition</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

