So, if you don’t pay the people you have working for you, they’ll find ways to pay themselves. Jason Calacanis comments on Top 50 Digg Users accepting money from Public Relations firms:
A PR/marketing firm confirmed with me that they had a number of the top 50 users on digg now on the payroll–and this wasn’t a totally insignificant firm.
The problems that digg is facing now is that a portion–certainly not all–of the top users feel like they should be getting paid for the 3-4 hours they spend on the site each day. Since digg will not pay them for their work they are finding other ways to get compensated.
My prediction is social news sites without a paid staff of editors cleaning the site up will be less trusted than ones with editorial staffs.
So, what works better? Volunteer editors or paid staff? Seems that this argument has been alive in the search directory sector for years. Thinking DMOZ vs. BOTW business model.