<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Semantic Web &amp; Its Implications on Search&#160;Marketing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.searchenginejournal.com/the-semantic-web-its-implications-on-search-marketing/5390/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/the-semantic-web-its-implications-on-search-marketing/5390/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 00:21:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Web Hosting Singapore</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/the-semantic-web-its-implications-on-search-marketing/5390/comment-page-1/#comment-1076902</link>
		<dc:creator>Web Hosting Singapore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 12:14:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/the-semantic-web-its-implications-on-search-marketing/5390/#comment-1076902</guid>
		<description>My guess is once Semantic Search is implemented, all the spammy SEO users or black hat users will start to use it to their advantage again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My guess is once Semantic Search is implemented, all the spammy SEO users or black hat users will start to use it to their advantage again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Crane Trader</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/the-semantic-web-its-implications-on-search-marketing/5390/comment-page-1/#comment-1018196</link>
		<dc:creator>Crane Trader</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2008 03:26:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/the-semantic-web-its-implications-on-search-marketing/5390/#comment-1018196</guid>
		<description>I think Semantic implementation is going to take a while to happen though. The philosophy of the Semantic Web has been discussed for a while now but has any of the SEs implemented it yet? 
SERPs will definitely going to be impacted in a big way once any implementation starts.  Not sure if i welcome this idea though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Semantic implementation is going to take a while to happen though. The philosophy of the Semantic Web has been discussed for a while now but has any of the SEs implemented it yet?<br />
SERPs will definitely going to be impacted in a big way once any implementation starts.  Not sure if i welcome this idea though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wayne Smallman</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/the-semantic-web-its-implications-on-search-marketing/5390/comment-page-1/#comment-540175</link>
		<dc:creator>Wayne Smallman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jul 2007 22:21:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/the-semantic-web-its-implications-on-search-marketing/5390/#comment-540175</guid>
		<description>We&#039;re already implementing the philosophy of the Semantic Web right now.

In a very real sense, mashups are drawing disparate data sources together into something much more meaningful.

However, the problems with personalized search are a little more complex; to get more out of the SEs , we have to put more in.

I call this the Google Information Paradox.

So the problem is, we would need to &#039;tweak&#039; our search preferences to tune the SEs -- tell them what we like, where we go, what we eat, when, who with, where we work et cetera.

Right now, Google, MSN, Ask, Yahoo! et cetera just don&#039;t have the applications to gather all of that information into one place.

Plus, there are genuine privacy concerns about gathering such information.

This is indeed a tangled web we weave...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We&#8217;re already implementing the philosophy of the Semantic Web right now.</p>
<p>In a very real sense, mashups are drawing disparate data sources together into something much more meaningful.</p>
<p>However, the problems with personalized search are a little more complex; to get more out of the SEs , we have to put more in.</p>
<p>I call this the Google Information Paradox.</p>
<p>So the problem is, we would need to &#8216;tweak&#8217; our search preferences to tune the SEs &#8212; tell them what we like, where we go, what we eat, when, who with, where we work et cetera.</p>
<p>Right now, Google, MSN, Ask, Yahoo! et cetera just don&#8217;t have the applications to gather all of that information into one place.</p>
<p>Plus, there are genuine privacy concerns about gathering such information.</p>
<p>This is indeed a tangled web we weave&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Belanger</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/the-semantic-web-its-implications-on-search-marketing/5390/comment-page-1/#comment-540109</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Belanger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jul 2007 19:05:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/the-semantic-web-its-implications-on-search-marketing/5390/#comment-540109</guid>
		<description>Yours is still a legacy model. Optimization is a two edge blade. It’s the joint-personalization need of both user and supplier. Personalization is always local jargon. Semantic personalization to both a user&#039;s contextual intent and a supplier’s “message” is a solved problem from a sub-ontology technology prospective. There is no future need for &quot;content-index-holding search engines&quot; as we understand them today. Google, MSN, Ask and Yahoo can be challenged successfully without competing with more massive datacenters. The sub-graph matching distributed hash indexing architecture is “the stone” on the way toward the current search Gooliath’s from www.jarg.com &#039;s patent portfolio sling.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yours is still a legacy model. Optimization is a two edge blade. It’s the joint-personalization need of both user and supplier. Personalization is always local jargon. Semantic personalization to both a user&#8217;s contextual intent and a supplier’s “message” is a solved problem from a sub-ontology technology prospective. There is no future need for &#8220;content-index-holding search engines&#8221; as we understand them today. Google, MSN, Ask and Yahoo can be challenged successfully without competing with more massive datacenters. The sub-graph matching distributed hash indexing architecture is “the stone” on the way toward the current search Gooliath’s from <a href="http://www.jarg.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.jarg.com</a> &#8216;s patent portfolio sling.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: egorych</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/the-semantic-web-its-implications-on-search-marketing/5390/comment-page-1/#comment-539246</link>
		<dc:creator>egorych</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jul 2007 18:00:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/the-semantic-web-its-implications-on-search-marketing/5390/#comment-539246</guid>
		<description>This can be a problem for some SEOs, because a lot of them have good traffic from spelling errors (google,gogle,googl and so on) :). Search improves, that&#039;s good. Now Google can answer some questions, not only give a SERP according to a few keywords. Fine.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This can be a problem for some SEOs, because a lot of them have good traffic from spelling errors (google,gogle,googl and so on) :). Search improves, that&#8217;s good. Now Google can answer some questions, not only give a SERP according to a few keywords. Fine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Internet Marketing Singapore</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/the-semantic-web-its-implications-on-search-marketing/5390/comment-page-1/#comment-539237</link>
		<dc:creator>Internet Marketing Singapore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jul 2007 17:49:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/the-semantic-web-its-implications-on-search-marketing/5390/#comment-539237</guid>
		<description>Semantic search is definitely going to play a bigger part on SEO as Google and the other Search Engines are going to do their best to have the right websites appearing in search results.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Semantic search is definitely going to play a bigger part on SEO as Google and the other Search Engines are going to do their best to have the right websites appearing in search results.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

