<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The ROI of PPC Beats Most Advertising&#160;Opportunities</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.searchenginejournal.com/the-roi-of-ppc-beats-most-advertising-opportunities/10475/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/the-roi-of-ppc-beats-most-advertising-opportunities/10475/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 22:19:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Boston SEO</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/the-roi-of-ppc-beats-most-advertising-opportunities/10475/comment-page-1/#comment-1118911</link>
		<dc:creator>Boston SEO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 15:57:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=10475#comment-1118911</guid>
		<description>As an employee of a company that uses PPC among other SEO techniques for its clients I would like to divide SEO into two categories -on page optimization and off page optimization. PPC would fall into the second category. Our company has found that the best approach is to continuously change the client&#039;s website based on the types of users that our going to that website. How do we know who those users are? Because we can check which of our off-page links brough them to the site and what sites they were looking at before hand.  Keeping the site up-to-date with who is looking at it, in turn affects the  channels we focus more on to attract those types of users.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As an employee of a company that uses PPC among other SEO techniques for its clients I would like to divide SEO into two categories -on page optimization and off page optimization. PPC would fall into the second category. Our company has found that the best approach is to continuously change the client&#8217;s website based on the types of users that our going to that website. How do we know who those users are? Because we can check which of our off-page links brough them to the site and what sites they were looking at before hand.  Keeping the site up-to-date with who is looking at it, in turn affects the  channels we focus more on to attract those types of users.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan London</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/the-roi-of-ppc-beats-most-advertising-opportunities/10475/comment-page-1/#comment-1100503</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan London</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 20:47:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=10475#comment-1100503</guid>
		<description>Site targeted: depends on the bid type... ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Site targeted: depends on the bid type&#8230; ;-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Carter</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/the-roi-of-ppc-beats-most-advertising-opportunities/10475/comment-page-1/#comment-1100491</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Carter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 18:30:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=10475#comment-1100491</guid>
		<description>Dan, Branded always does better than General on ROAS basis for us, but that&#039;s also part of the sales cycle... I have plenty to say on that in a future article. 

Haven&#039;t tested image campaigns extensively- my limited experience suggested it would be similar to lack of performance from banner ads- have you seen something else?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dan, Branded always does better than General on ROAS basis for us, but that&#8217;s also part of the sales cycle&#8230; I have plenty to say on that in a future article. </p>
<p>Haven&#8217;t tested image campaigns extensively- my limited experience suggested it would be similar to lack of performance from banner ads- have you seen something else?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan London</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/the-roi-of-ppc-beats-most-advertising-opportunities/10475/comment-page-1/#comment-1100490</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan London</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 18:19:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=10475#comment-1100490</guid>
		<description>Great post and some really key points you listed.

I&#039;m curious to know how branded terms did compared to general terms and if you used and site-targeted image campaigns.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post and some really key points you listed.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m curious to know how branded terms did compared to general terms and if you used and site-targeted image campaigns.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

