Comments on: The latest on update Austin (Google’s January update) http://www.searchenginejournal.com/the-latest-on-update-austin-googles-january-update/237/ Wed, 15 Feb 2012 00:21:59 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v= By: viagra http://www.searchenginejournal.com/the-latest-on-update-austin-googles-january-update/237/comment-page-1/#comment-34810 viagra Mon, 17 Jan 2005 06:16:22 +0000 http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=237#comment-34810 Very good webpage you have here, and best greetings to all your visitors Very good webpage you have here, and best greetings to all your visitors

]]> By: phentermine http://www.searchenginejournal.com/the-latest-on-update-austin-googles-january-update/237/comment-page-1/#comment-33791 phentermine Sat, 15 Jan 2005 12:29:17 +0000 http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=237#comment-33791 Thank you for opening a wonderfully new sight..I wish you the best of luck with your new venture. Thank you for opening a wonderfully new sight..I wish you the best of luck with your new venture.

]]> By: Jewelry http://www.searchenginejournal.com/the-latest-on-update-austin-googles-january-update/237/comment-page-1/#comment-22134 Jewelry Mon, 20 Dec 2004 20:39:59 +0000 http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=237#comment-22134 I really, truly am glad I found this site. It has answered so many questions for me. I will be back. Thank You I really, truly am glad I found this site. It has answered so many questions for me. I will be back. Thank You

]]> By: William Cross http://www.searchenginejournal.com/the-latest-on-update-austin-googles-january-update/237/comment-page-1/#comment-95 William Cross Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000 http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=237#comment-95 This person obviously has no idea. He is stating things as if they are hard and fast facts in that article, not theories. There have been NO conclusive tests yet to verify the existence of a hilltop expert system being used. In fact most of the leading "experts" are leaning more towards TSPR as the underlying algo now, since some tests have shown that the expert system (hilltop) does not cover all aspects of the changes in serps for differant types of searches that we are seeing, while TSPR does address them in a much more rational way. Why do people think they have to make people think they know what they are doing by trying to sound as if they actually know something as fact when they have no clue and are just re-iterating something they read somewhere else? This person obviously has no idea. He is stating things as if they are hard and fast facts in that article, not theories. There have been NO conclusive tests yet to verify the existence of a hilltop expert system being used. In fact most of the leading “experts” are leaning more towards TSPR as the underlying algo now, since some tests have shown that the expert system (hilltop) does not cover all aspects of the changes in serps for differant types of searches that we are seeing, while TSPR does address them in a much more rational way.

Why do people think they have to make people think they know what they are doing by trying to sound as if they actually know something as fact when they have no clue and are just re-iterating something they read somewhere else?

]]>