Comments on: The Google Feedburner Rumor http://www.searchenginejournal.com/the-google-feedburner-rumor/4944/ Tue, 14 Feb 2012 13:23:24 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v= By: Raj Dash http://www.searchenginejournal.com/the-google-feedburner-rumor/4944/comment-page-1/#comment-467889 Raj Dash Sun, 20 May 2007 04:31:52 +0000 http://www.searchenginejournal.com/the-google-feedburner-rumor/4944/#comment-467889 We need to band together and create our own replacements. But each service is at least a few years old. So can they be self-sustaining enough to earn money? It'd take a lot of effort, and few people will bother. Hence many of us will keep using Google even if we don't want to. We need to band together and create our own replacements. But each service is at least a few years old. So can they be self-sustaining enough to earn money? It’d take a lot of effort, and few people will bother. Hence many of us will keep using Google even if we don’t want to.

]]> By: Seo Refugee Blog http://www.searchenginejournal.com/the-google-feedburner-rumor/4944/comment-page-1/#comment-467887 Seo Refugee Blog Sun, 20 May 2007 04:27:14 +0000 http://www.searchenginejournal.com/the-google-feedburner-rumor/4944/#comment-467887 Please, for the love of everything that is good in this world, will people stop selling out to Google? I realize it's a lot of money and I know I'd probably do the same thing if I were in their shoes... but I'm not. Google doesn't need to get it's hands on any more information or any more services that I use. Please, for the love of everything that is good in this world, will people stop selling out to Google? I realize it’s a lot of money and I know I’d probably do the same thing if I were in their shoes… but I’m not. Google doesn’t need to get it’s hands on any more information or any more services that I use.

]]> By: Raj Dash http://www.searchenginejournal.com/the-google-feedburner-rumor/4944/comment-page-1/#comment-467224 Raj Dash Sat, 19 May 2007 04:18:36 +0000 http://www.searchenginejournal.com/the-google-feedburner-rumor/4944/#comment-467224 Even as a long-time contributor to Performancing, I can't see any value for Google in the site. Pheedo, on the other hand, might be. But if Google gets Feedburner, that's yet another serious property that someone else should have bought first. Anyone for preemptive strikes on other companies? Wireless operators? What does Google want? Go buy that first :) Even as a long-time contributor to Performancing, I can’t see any value for Google in the site. Pheedo, on the other hand, might be.

But if Google gets Feedburner, that’s yet another serious property that someone else should have bought first. Anyone for preemptive strikes on other companies? Wireless operators? What does Google want? Go buy that first :)

]]> By: fo.unta.in http://www.searchenginejournal.com/the-google-feedburner-rumor/4944/comment-page-1/#comment-467196 fo.unta.in Sat, 19 May 2007 03:48:41 +0000 http://www.searchenginejournal.com/the-google-feedburner-rumor/4944/#comment-467196 Makes sense, and its fun to see all this game around advertising : doubleclick: google 1. MS 0. aquantive: google 1. MS 1. Feedburner:google 2. MS 1. whos next? performancing? pheedo? Makes sense, and its fun to see all this game around advertising : doubleclick: google 1. MS 0. aquantive: google 1. MS 1. Feedburner:google 2. MS 1.

whos next? performancing? pheedo?

]]> By: Raj Dash http://www.searchenginejournal.com/the-google-feedburner-rumor/4944/comment-page-1/#comment-467029 Raj Dash Fri, 18 May 2007 23:27:05 +0000 http://www.searchenginejournal.com/the-google-feedburner-rumor/4944/#comment-467029 ah, crap, not again. ah, crap, not again.

]]> By: Deaf Musician http://www.searchenginejournal.com/the-google-feedburner-rumor/4944/comment-page-1/#comment-467024 Deaf Musician Fri, 18 May 2007 23:12:54 +0000 http://www.searchenginejournal.com/the-google-feedburner-rumor/4944/#comment-467024 Ooooh, that's going to be nice, if it did happen! That's cheap though, 100 mill? That's it? Ooooh, that’s going to be nice, if it did happen! That’s cheap though, 100 mill? That’s it?

]]>