<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Target.com Sued Over Lack of ALT Tags&#160;(Attributes)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.searchenginejournal.com/targetcom-sued-over-lack-of-alt-tags/2922/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/targetcom-sued-over-lack-of-alt-tags/2922/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 17:43:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: bbrian017</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/targetcom-sued-over-lack-of-alt-tags/2922/comment-page-1/#comment-1100891</link>
		<dc:creator>bbrian017</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 May 2009 15:49:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=2922#comment-1100891</guid>
		<description>This is so silly! I don&#039;t think it&#039;s right! Does this mean any website owner can be sued?

Did you do a follow up article on this  I can read?

Cheers,

Brian</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is so silly! I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s right! Does this mean any website owner can be sued?</p>
<p>Did you do a follow up article on this  I can read?</p>
<p>Cheers,</p>
<p>Brian</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sac ekimi</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/targetcom-sued-over-lack-of-alt-tags/2922/comment-page-1/#comment-877749</link>
		<dc:creator>Sac ekimi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 16:42:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=2922#comment-877749</guid>
		<description>i think no one is responsible for this situation. I think they have just forgetten. Because their software is huge so they spent their times to flexibility and security, not for seo.

Mehmet</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i think no one is responsible for this situation. I think they have just forgetten. Because their software is huge so they spent their times to flexibility and security, not for seo.</p>
<p>Mehmet</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Law May Require Webistes To Be Accessible To Disabled Users &#124; SEOdisco</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/targetcom-sued-over-lack-of-alt-tags/2922/comment-page-1/#comment-680255</link>
		<dc:creator>Law May Require Webistes To Be Accessible To Disabled Users &#124; SEOdisco</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Oct 2007 19:52:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=2922#comment-680255</guid>
		<description>[...] of accessibility to visually impaired internet users. Loren covered this issue last year over at Search Engine Journal:  The suit is centered around Target.com’s lack of ALT text in its site’s images. Wonder [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of accessibility to visually impaired internet users. Loren covered this issue last year over at Search Engine Journal:  The suit is centered around Target.com’s lack of ALT text in its site’s images. Wonder [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick Bostic - Real Estate Marketing &#187; RMLS In Need of an Overhaul to Help Portland Real Estate</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/targetcom-sued-over-lack-of-alt-tags/2922/comment-page-1/#comment-490845</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Bostic - Real Estate Marketing &#187; RMLS In Need of an Overhaul to Help Portland Real Estate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jun 2007 01:51:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=2922#comment-490845</guid>
		<description>[...] and it&#8217;s not accessible to those who may not be able to read the screen like many of us can. Target was sued because their site wasn&#8217;t accessible. This is the first step in an already confusing process and now blind people are being given an [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] and it&#8217;s not accessible to those who may not be able to read the screen like many of us can. Target was sued because their site wasn&#8217;t accessible. This is the first step in an already confusing process and now blind people are being given an [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: blake</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/targetcom-sued-over-lack-of-alt-tags/2922/comment-page-1/#comment-325755</link>
		<dc:creator>blake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2006 07:20:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=2922#comment-325755</guid>
		<description>IE wrongly causes ALT attributes to display in a &quot;tooltip&quot; style fashion. This can actually be annoying and even work against usability/accessibility but cover other information on the page. It is supposed to be an ALTERNATIVE to an image. 

The TITLE attribute is the one that is supposed to (and does in Firefox and Safari) function as a tooltip.

I like mors idea. Let&#039;s starting suing sites for being IE only and the like.

Ironically, a lot of the assistive technology that blind folks would use doesn&#039;t support IE 7.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>IE wrongly causes ALT attributes to display in a &#8220;tooltip&#8221; style fashion. This can actually be annoying and even work against usability/accessibility but cover other information on the page. It is supposed to be an ALTERNATIVE to an image. </p>
<p>The TITLE attribute is the one that is supposed to (and does in Firefox and Safari) function as a tooltip.</p>
<p>I like mors idea. Let&#8217;s starting suing sites for being IE only and the like.</p>
<p>Ironically, a lot of the assistive technology that blind folks would use doesn&#8217;t support IE 7.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joy</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/targetcom-sued-over-lack-of-alt-tags/2922/comment-page-1/#comment-86268</link>
		<dc:creator>joy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Apr 2006 23:58:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=2922#comment-86268</guid>
		<description>You&#039;ll want to change the webstandards.org link to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.webstandards.org/2006/02/09/taking-aim-at-targetcom/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.webstandards.org/2006/02/09/taking-aim-at-targetcom/&lt;/a&gt; for some reason, your original link merely redirects to their main page.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;ll want to change the webstandards.org link to <a href="http://www.webstandards.org/2006/02/09/taking-aim-at-targetcom/" rel="nofollow">http://www.webstandards.org/2006/02/09/taking-aim-at-targetcom/</a> for some reason, your original link merely redirects to their main page.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IzxVnaAkHJ</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/targetcom-sued-over-lack-of-alt-tags/2922/comment-page-1/#comment-63798</link>
		<dc:creator>IzxVnaAkHJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2006 11:36:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=2922#comment-63798</guid>
		<description>JwUyKsvCcFx buo41tps12p cpfo1ACKoQk</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JwUyKsvCcFx buo41tps12p cpfo1ACKoQk</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mors</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/targetcom-sued-over-lack-of-alt-tags/2922/comment-page-1/#comment-63609</link>
		<dc:creator>mors</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Feb 2006 02:31:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=2922#comment-63609</guid>
		<description>How about start suing ALL website that block browsers ?!? That would make more sense.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How about start suing ALL website that block browsers ?!? That would make more sense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Derek Andrews</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/targetcom-sued-over-lack-of-alt-tags/2922/comment-page-1/#comment-63197</link>
		<dc:creator>Derek Andrews</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2006 13:57:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=2922#comment-63197</guid>
		<description>Nathan, I have never heard of Alt tags for IE, but no doubt this is just another toy that Microsoft added in an attempt to win the browser wars. Any sensible web designer will ignore it and stick to standards compliant code that can be understood by any browser.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nathan, I have never heard of Alt tags for IE, but no doubt this is just another toy that Microsoft added in an attempt to win the browser wars. Any sensible web designer will ignore it and stick to standards compliant code that can be understood by any browser.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nathan Weinberg</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/targetcom-sued-over-lack-of-alt-tags/2922/comment-page-1/#comment-63018</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathan Weinberg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2006 05:23:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=2922#comment-63018</guid>
		<description>Actually, there are ALT tags, they just don&#039;t work in Firefox or Opera, just IE (and don&#039;t ask me how they screwed THAT up).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, there are ALT tags, they just don&#8217;t work in Firefox or Opera, just IE (and don&#8217;t ask me how they screwed THAT up).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

