Comments on: Stale vs Fresh Document as Defined by Google

By: cemal

cemal — Tue, 04 Aug 2009 14:46:49 +0000

By: KDye Vertical Leap

KDye Vertical Leap — Thu, 09 Oct 2008 13:53:29 +0000

@afewtips – yes, this is true in a way, but if you have ever found your site ranking for something really random to your main subject, you’ll find that it does drop down over time as people choose the more relevant results around it in preference.

By: CEMAL

CEMAL — Thu, 09 Oct 2008 09:01:33 +0000

MUSKARA TRAVEL AGENCY Cappadocia tours, cappadocia hotels, turkey tours privite tours, istanbul city tours, adventure tours, cultural tours, anzac day tour, blue voyage, rent a car, balloon tour, jeep safari tour

By: afewtips.com

afewtips.com — Tue, 07 Oct 2008 16:33:08 +0000

Google contradicts itself – because how does something that is ranked high fall off? It continues to get clicked, which in turn never makes it stale. Even though the story is from old info.

By: Toma

Toma — Sun, 05 Oct 2008 18:01:57 +0000

Hi,

Interesting information. I always put a related articles or last articles at the end of a post so that the page looks a little different for the search engines. Of course that the main content remains unchanged but it’s worth a shot.

By: Cooking

Cooking — Sat, 04 Oct 2008 11:05:36 +0000

As always a very informative article. Thanks for the great stuff.

By: Fred

Fred — Thu, 02 Oct 2008 19:02:12 +0000

I think it’s interesting that while document creation date/date updated is listed as a factor in the stale/freshness quotient, it’s not one of the primary four metrics analyzed in the patent.

I guess it stands to reason that a frequently updated document no one likes is less relevant than a timeless work which people continue to find relevance in.

By: Seo Web Design Services

Seo Web Design Services — Thu, 02 Oct 2008 11:46:59 +0000

Interesting, you tend to think that once a webpage is up you never need to think about it again.

Thanks Again Ann