ss_blog_claim=ad249198800d1f7ffa32ece7d4a2d95a
Loren Baker, Editor

Social Search Engines Having the Answers?

July 18th, 2006 by Loren Baker, Editor | 3 Comments

Social Search Engines Having the Answers?

The LA Times is featuring an Associated Press article which addresses the question of social search & social media and whether the human powered suggestion and citation model will grow to become more useful than, or a cherished and fact checking partner to more ‘traditional’ bot & link based search algorithms.

The article, Do ‘Social’ Search Engines Have the Answers?, goes beyond the happenings at Yahoo Social Media and Google with a featurette on PreFound.com;

At PreFound, launched this year, users contribute to the knowledge pool by submitting clusters of websites that they believe would appeal to like-minded people. As an incentive, the largest contributors even get a share of PreFound’s advertising money.

A visitor looking for information on, say, New Jersey beaches can get the user-recommended sites, grouped by users. One user’s cluster gives you restaurants, Internet cafes and other information on the coastal town of Ventnor City, N.J.

The more people contribute sites, the better the results.

The article also discusses the adaptation of social search over the last year by Google and how Yahoo has repositioned its search offering and presence to a mantra of Social Search. Recently Yahoo launched what might be their most user friendly, revenue building and relevant social media product to date, Yahoo Trip Planner which is chocked full of searchable travel blogs, photos, ratings and suggestions.

More on Yahoo:

Eckart Walther, vice president of product management for Yahoo, said that although traditional search technology could be refined, it would probably remain best for fact-based searches. Social search, he said, provides the promise of answers to more subjective questions.

“If you asked me what the best hotel in San Francisco is, we’re different people, have different friends and different opinions,” Walther said. “Search engines are terrible at answering these kinds of questions.”




Comments

3 responses so far ↓

  • Lee Odden on Jul 18, 2006 at 8:12 am

    Hey Loren, I looks like great minds think alike!
    http://www.toprankblog.com/2006/07/social-search/

    That post also includes an article on social search and tagging by iProspect.

  • Turin Shroud Group on Jul 18, 2006 at 4:28 pm

    While we agree, in general, with the premise as stated at PreFound: “We believe that communities of knowledgeable, interested people can identify relevant sites with greater accuracy than a search engine that depends on computer programs,” it is certainly to early to tell if the concept will work.

    There is a great danger that the bias of those interested in helping to build to site will be too influential.

    Bias will be particularly significant on controversial topics.

    Lets see what how it develops.

  • Blackbeard on Jul 18, 2006 at 4:49 pm

    So, better results via social networks? After watching Digg for the last 6 months, I can say that “social networks of intelligent people” don’t give you intelligent results. It might help at first, but if it becomes widespread, search engine marketers will buy people/votes instead of links(votes). As long as there is a monetary incentive to ranking high, then spam and bad results will always exist. Period.

Leave a Comment