Comments on: Shall We Prop Up Propeller.com?

By: cooltop

cooltop — Tue, 06 Jan 2009 02:44:34 +0000

I agree: just stick with Digg. Phil Hughes, Esteli, Nicaragua

By: Steve

Steve — Wed, 17 Sep 2008 00:41:58 +0000

They don’t have nofollow tags which is good, but there’s no way to add text to a link either. Or am I missing something. What are the SEO benefits other than a non-relevat link back to the source?

By: CBR

CBR — Fri, 05 Sep 2008 01:09:09 +0000

The old version needed to be fixed and the new version redircts links so I guess the link juice is not passed. I am voting with my feet and going back to Digg.

By: Kat

Kat — Wed, 06 Aug 2008 18:57:51 +0000

I am not a fan of the new aesthetics. Sort of loses some street cred points in my book. I tend to agree with @RyanNagy in that moving to niche communities will garner more targeted traffic and will hopefully build long term relationships.

By: cohnsey

cohnsey — Tue, 05 Aug 2008 21:06:27 +0000

propeller kinda stinks. i like stumbleupon the best

By: Ryan Nagy

Ryan Nagy — Tue, 05 Aug 2008 20:47:15 +0000

Hmmm. I must admit that I had never heard of propellor until I read your post! Shall I hang my head in shame? They seem to have a high page rank (8). Personally, I have been moving into smaller and smaller Web 2.0 sites in order to get more targeted traffic. But propellor does look interesting.

cheers – Ryan

By: busby seo

busby seo — Tue, 05 Aug 2008 12:23:43 +0000

refer recd.us like that Propeller it too has a big changes in interface

By: seo

seo — Tue, 05 Aug 2008 10:22:04 +0000

I observed that also that Propeller has a big changes in interface but maybe on the navigation

By: Web Design Romania

Web Design Romania — Tue, 05 Aug 2008 08:33:10 +0000

Maybe Propeller needs money so bad that the ads are the priority now

By: Burgo

Burgo — Tue, 05 Aug 2008 00:42:30 +0000

Darrell, you might want to do some editing on that post… there seem to be quite a few grammatical errors there. Just sayin’ is all… :P