<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Most SEOs Can’t Do Reputation&#160;Management</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.searchenginejournal.com/seo-online-reputation-management/6667/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/seo-online-reputation-management/6667/</link>
	<description>Latest Search Engine News from the Search Engine Journal</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 13:04:30 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Søgemaskineoptimering</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/seo-online-reputation-management/6667/comment-page-1/#comment-1075270</link>
		<dc:creator>Søgemaskineoptimering</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Apr 2008 17:56:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/why-most-seos-can%e2%80%99t-do-reputation-management/6667/#comment-1075270</guid>
		<description>Does somebody know of linking from poor pages / bad neighbourhoods which point into pages we wish to disappear from Google</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does somebody know of linking from poor pages / bad neighbourhoods which point into pages we wish to disappear from Google</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: john andrews</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/seo-online-reputation-management/6667/comment-page-1/#comment-1073149</link>
		<dc:creator>john andrews</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 06:58:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/why-most-seos-can%e2%80%99t-do-reputation-management/6667/#comment-1073149</guid>
		<description>&quot;Most SEOs Can’t Do Reputation Management&quot; is correct. But these days it seems most SEOs cant do SEO either. I think these observations might be related.

As for the rest, as far as search results go it&#039;s just good SEO. Keep in mind that good SEO addresses all of the things that might influence sites going up, sites going down, etc. 

Now finding a good SEO.... that can be a challenge.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Most SEOs Can’t Do Reputation Management&#8221; is correct. But these days it seems most SEOs cant do SEO either. I think these observations might be related.</p>
<p>As for the rest, as far as search results go it&#8217;s just good SEO. Keep in mind that good SEO addresses all of the things that might influence sites going up, sites going down, etc. </p>
<p>Now finding a good SEO&#8230;. that can be a challenge.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brett Borders</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/seo-online-reputation-management/6667/comment-page-1/#comment-1073135</link>
		<dc:creator>Brett Borders</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 18:57:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/why-most-seos-can%e2%80%99t-do-reputation-management/6667/#comment-1073135</guid>
		<description>Online reputation management is more difficult and labor intensive than SEO, no doubt about it...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Online reputation management is more difficult and labor intensive than SEO, no doubt about it&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/seo-online-reputation-management/6667/comment-page-1/#comment-1073095</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 02:18:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/why-most-seos-can%e2%80%99t-do-reputation-management/6667/#comment-1073095</guid>
		<description>Maybe this site could help everyone..? http://reputationhq.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe this site could help everyone..? <a href="http://reputationhq.com" rel="nofollow">http://reputationhq.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jaan Kanellis</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/seo-online-reputation-management/6667/comment-page-1/#comment-1073075</link>
		<dc:creator>Jaan Kanellis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 20:29:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/why-most-seos-can%e2%80%99t-do-reputation-management/6667/#comment-1073075</guid>
		<description>&quot;No they are not. Each of these requires different application of various SEO techniques. You cant actually think that moving a site UP in the rankings is the “same thing” as moving it DOWN.&quot;

OK well semantics aside if I am getting websites to rank above yours I am moving them down.

&quot;Good SEOs will not be trying to get multiple sites listed in the same SERP unless they are working in a conflict of interest with a multiple clients or are wearing the darker shade of hat. Either way I would not personally classify these folks as “reputable”.&quot;

WOW?

So making sure my linkedin profile page, my personal blog, my company website, mybloglog profile page, etc rank well for my company name, personal name is a BAD thing?  I would not think so.  This is what I meant by ranking multiple websites for a phrase.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;No they are not. Each of these requires different application of various SEO techniques. You cant actually think that moving a site UP in the rankings is the “same thing” as moving it DOWN.&#8221;</p>
<p>OK well semantics aside if I am getting websites to rank above yours I am moving them down.</p>
<p>&#8220;Good SEOs will not be trying to get multiple sites listed in the same SERP unless they are working in a conflict of interest with a multiple clients or are wearing the darker shade of hat. Either way I would not personally classify these folks as “reputable”.&#8221;</p>
<p>WOW?</p>
<p>So making sure my linkedin profile page, my personal blog, my company website, mybloglog profile page, etc rank well for my company name, personal name is a BAD thing?  I would not think so.  This is what I meant by ranking multiple websites for a phrase.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Carcutt</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/seo-online-reputation-management/6667/comment-page-1/#comment-1073073</link>
		<dc:creator>John Carcutt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 20:17:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/why-most-seos-can%e2%80%99t-do-reputation-management/6667/#comment-1073073</guid>
		<description>@ Jaan

&gt; &quot;These are the same thing right?&quot;

No they are not. Each of these requires different application of various SEO techniques. You cant actually think that moving a site UP in the rankings is the &quot;same thing&quot; as moving it DOWN.

&gt; &quot;Once again why would this be any different for any reputable SEO?&quot;

You focus on an important factor that may not have been clear in the article. What I am talking about here is multiple sites in a single SERP.

Good SEOs will not be trying to get multiple sites listed in the same SERP unless they are working in a conflict of interest with a multiple clients or are wearing the darker shade of hat. Either way I would not personally classify these folks as &quot;reputable&quot;.

&gt; &quot;Sure you do, by pushing your pages above the negative websites you essential control them by pushing them down.&quot;

I think you misunderstand. What I am talking about here is the ability to modify a site to influence its rankings. This is a staple of standard SEO, changing content, fixing technical issues etc., here you have no access to change or modify anything on the site you are trying to move.


@Elizabeth Able

I Agree 100%</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Jaan</p>
<p>&gt; &#8220;These are the same thing right?&#8221;</p>
<p>No they are not. Each of these requires different application of various SEO techniques. You cant actually think that moving a site UP in the rankings is the &#8220;same thing&#8221; as moving it DOWN.</p>
<p>&gt; &#8220;Once again why would this be any different for any reputable SEO?&#8221;</p>
<p>You focus on an important factor that may not have been clear in the article. What I am talking about here is multiple sites in a single SERP.</p>
<p>Good SEOs will not be trying to get multiple sites listed in the same SERP unless they are working in a conflict of interest with a multiple clients or are wearing the darker shade of hat. Either way I would not personally classify these folks as &#8220;reputable&#8221;.</p>
<p>&gt; &#8220;Sure you do, by pushing your pages above the negative websites you essential control them by pushing them down.&#8221;</p>
<p>I think you misunderstand. What I am talking about here is the ability to modify a site to influence its rankings. This is a staple of standard SEO, changing content, fixing technical issues etc., here you have no access to change or modify anything on the site you are trying to move.</p>
<p>@Elizabeth Able</p>
<p>I Agree 100%</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elizabeth Able</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/seo-online-reputation-management/6667/comment-page-1/#comment-1073059</link>
		<dc:creator>Elizabeth Able</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 17:30:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/why-most-seos-can%e2%80%99t-do-reputation-management/6667/#comment-1073059</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s REALLY hard to tell a SEO that social media is *not* about traffic.  It&#039;s about relationships.  Social media platforms facilitate relationships.  A SEO-based marketer will listen to this and say all forms of &quot;yes, but,&quot; and then skip to theorizing different tactics for how to manage an algo&#039;s possible interpretation of human action, in order to do helpful things with traffic.  But, it&#039;s not about the traffic.  It&#039;s about relationships fueled by human nature, facilitated by infrastructure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s REALLY hard to tell a SEO that social media is *not* about traffic.  It&#8217;s about relationships.  Social media platforms facilitate relationships.  A SEO-based marketer will listen to this and say all forms of &#8220;yes, but,&#8221; and then skip to theorizing different tactics for how to manage an algo&#8217;s possible interpretation of human action, in order to do helpful things with traffic.  But, it&#8217;s not about the traffic.  It&#8217;s about relationships fueled by human nature, facilitated by infrastructure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CheckIT</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/seo-online-reputation-management/6667/comment-page-1/#comment-1073048</link>
		<dc:creator>CheckIT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 14:27:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/why-most-seos-can%e2%80%99t-do-reputation-management/6667/#comment-1073048</guid>
		<description>See &#039;eSports Partners&#039; in the serps and see why this is valuable.

Great post John.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>See &#8216;eSports Partners&#8217; in the serps and see why this is valuable.</p>
<p>Great post John.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WithHat</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/seo-online-reputation-management/6667/comment-page-1/#comment-1073047</link>
		<dc:creator>WithHat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 14:20:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/why-most-seos-can%e2%80%99t-do-reputation-management/6667/#comment-1073047</guid>
		<description>WOW Jaan, I think you illustrated his point perfectly...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WOW Jaan, I think you illustrated his point perfectly&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jaan Kanellis</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/seo-online-reputation-management/6667/comment-page-1/#comment-1073033</link>
		<dc:creator>Jaan Kanellis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 07:05:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/why-most-seos-can%e2%80%99t-do-reputation-management/6667/#comment-1073033</guid>
		<description>I disagree:

SEO - Moving one site UP in the rankings
ORM - Moving multiple sites DOWN in the rankings

These are the same thing right?

SEO - Managing one site for a set of keywords
ORM - Managing multiple sites for a set of keywords

Once again why would this be any different for any reputable SEO?

SEO - You have control of your site
ORM - You have no control over the negative sites

Sure you do, by pushing your pages above the negative websites you essential control them by pushing them down.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I disagree:</p>
<p>SEO &#8211; Moving one site UP in the rankings<br />
ORM &#8211; Moving multiple sites DOWN in the rankings</p>
<p>These are the same thing right?</p>
<p>SEO &#8211; Managing one site for a set of keywords<br />
ORM &#8211; Managing multiple sites for a set of keywords</p>
<p>Once again why would this be any different for any reputable SEO?</p>
<p>SEO &#8211; You have control of your site<br />
ORM &#8211; You have no control over the negative sites</p>
<p>Sure you do, by pushing your pages above the negative websites you essential control them by pushing them down.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
