Comments on: 9 Semantic Search Engines That Will Change the World of Search http://www.searchenginejournal.com/semantic-search-engines/9832/ Tue, 14 Feb 2012 09:28:52 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v= By: Intelegencia http://www.searchenginejournal.com/semantic-search-engines/9832/comment-page-1/#comment-1271158 Intelegencia Wed, 24 Mar 2010 12:51:45 +0000 http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=9832#comment-1271158 Great Article...I am surprised you are unaware of Goldfire since it is deployed in hundreds of companies for Semantic Search of both internal and external content.<br><br>-----------------<br><a href="http://www.intelegencia.com" rel="nofollow">www.intelegencia.com</a> Great Article…I am surprised you are unaware of Goldfire since it is deployed in hundreds of companies for Semantic Search of both internal and external content.

—————–
http://www.intelegencia.com

]]> By: Intelegencia http://www.searchenginejournal.com/semantic-search-engines/9832/comment-page-1/#comment-1230654 Intelegencia Wed, 24 Mar 2010 07:51:45 +0000 http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=9832#comment-1230654 Great Article...I am surprised you are unaware of Goldfire since it is deployed in hundreds of companies for Semantic Search of both internal and external content.<br><br>-----------------<br><a href="http://www.intelegencia.com" rel="nofollow">www.intelegencia.com</a> Great Article…I am surprised you are unaware of Goldfire since it is deployed in hundreds of companies for Semantic Search of both internal and external content.

—————–
http://www.intelegencia.com

]]> By: Van http://www.searchenginejournal.com/semantic-search-engines/9832/comment-page-1/#comment-1174081 Van Wed, 06 Jan 2010 03:58:45 +0000 http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=9832#comment-1174081 I like the powerset wikipedia article search. It certainly cuts down the time from having to search for the right article. I havent given the others a test drive as ye but might have to have a look. Thanks I like the powerset wikipedia article search. It certainly cuts down the time from having to search for the right article. I havent given the others a test drive as ye but might have to have a look. Thanks

]]> By: sam dizines http://www.searchenginejournal.com/semantic-search-engines/9832/comment-page-1/#comment-1156405 sam dizines Sat, 05 Dec 2009 19:59:26 +0000 http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=9832#comment-1156405 I agree that semantic search would be good. But I did a quick visit to the above sites, and even though they produced some results on certain situations, they are no good most of the instances. I see the results for my keywords much better in Google than any one of them mentioned above. I agree that semantic search would be good. But I did a quick visit to the above sites, and even though they produced some results on certain situations, they are no good most of the instances.

I see the results for my keywords much better in Google than any one of them mentioned above.

]]> By: Gregman2 http://www.searchenginejournal.com/semantic-search-engines/9832/comment-page-1/#comment-1131222 Gregman2 Fri, 23 Oct 2009 00:18:28 +0000 http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=9832#comment-1131222 Yebol is better than Bing (formerly Powerset). Check it out: http://www.yebol.com Yebol is better than Bing (formerly Powerset). Check it out: http://www.yebol.com

]]> By: Ashish http://www.searchenginejournal.com/semantic-search-engines/9832/comment-page-1/#comment-1105785 Ashish Mon, 20 Jul 2009 16:41:19 +0000 http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=9832#comment-1105785 Interesting to know about all those semantic engines! However as it's said before, I don't see people leaving Google to use any of these engines. Google's algorithm is much advanced than a single LSI concept and returns far superior results. Look at its PageRank technology which itself considers 500 million variables and 2 billion terms. Absolutely no competition there. Interesting to know about all those semantic engines!

However as it’s said before, I don’t see people leaving Google to use any of these engines. Google’s algorithm is much advanced than a single LSI concept and returns far superior results.

Look at its PageRank technology which itself considers 500 million variables and 2 billion terms.

Absolutely no competition there.

]]> By: louis vuitton gift http://www.searchenginejournal.com/semantic-search-engines/9832/comment-page-1/#comment-1103907 louis vuitton gift Tue, 30 Jun 2009 15:09:54 +0000 http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=9832#comment-1103907 Interesting article! Interesting article!

]]> By: louis vuitton http://www.searchenginejournal.com/semantic-search-engines/9832/comment-page-1/#comment-1103360 louis vuitton Wed, 24 Jun 2009 02:42:24 +0000 http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=9832#comment-1103360 Very informative post Arun! waiting for the other ones Very informative post Arun! waiting for the other ones

]]> By: louis vuitton sale http://www.searchenginejournal.com/semantic-search-engines/9832/comment-page-1/#comment-1103246 louis vuitton sale Mon, 22 Jun 2009 16:05:06 +0000 http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=9832#comment-1103246 New Search will come from Semantic AND Social. Because Sense cant be handle alone in so many informations <a href="http://www.louisvuitton2u.com" rel="nofollow">Cheap Louis Vuitton</a> New Search will come from Semantic AND Social. Because Sense cant be handle alone in so many informations Cheap Louis Vuitton

]]> By: Marx http://www.searchenginejournal.com/semantic-search-engines/9832/comment-page-1/#comment-1101943 Marx Sun, 07 Jun 2009 07:58:49 +0000 http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=9832#comment-1101943 Nice post Arun, Keep it up! ( are u indian? :) if yes, special thanks ) Nice post Arun, Keep it up! ( are u indian? :) if yes, special thanks )

]]>