<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Search Engines Can Read Macromedia FLASH&#160;SDK</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.searchenginejournal.com/search-engines-can-read-macromedia-flash-sdk/889/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/search-engines-can-read-macromedia-flash-sdk/889/</link>
	<description>Latest Search Engine News from the Search Engine Journal</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 23:59:17 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: energy certificate</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/search-engines-can-read-macromedia-flash-sdk/889/comment-page-1/#comment-1082729</link>
		<dc:creator>energy certificate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 15:40:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=889#comment-1082729</guid>
		<description>Very nice article thanks for excelent site with information 
thanks :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very nice article thanks for excelent site with information<br />
thanks :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: p&#111;k&#101;r</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/search-engines-can-read-macromedia-flash-sdk/889/comment-page-1/#comment-33697</link>
		<dc:creator>p&#111;k&#101;r</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Jan 2005 01:32:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=889#comment-33697</guid>
		<description>My English not so good but thank for lovely site with information I looking for and need also.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My English not so good but thank for lovely site with information I looking for and need also.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ph&#101;nt&#101;rm&#105;n&#101;</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/search-engines-can-read-macromedia-flash-sdk/889/comment-page-1/#comment-30884</link>
		<dc:creator>ph&#101;nt&#101;rm&#105;n&#101;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Jan 2005 03:21:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=889#comment-30884</guid>
		<description>YOU HAVE GOT SOME KIND OF CLASS IN THIS SITE. Good to see you up and around!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>YOU HAVE GOT SOME KIND OF CLASS IN THIS SITE. Good to see you up and around!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cr&#101;d&#105;t c&#97;rds</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/search-engines-can-read-macromedia-flash-sdk/889/comment-page-1/#comment-22279</link>
		<dc:creator>cr&#101;d&#105;t c&#97;rds</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Dec 2004 07:21:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=889#comment-22279</guid>
		<description>You have a great website. Keep up the good work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You have a great website. Keep up the good work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Dowdell</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/search-engines-can-read-macromedia-flash-sdk/889/comment-page-1/#comment-1890</link>
		<dc:creator>John Dowdell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Sep 2004 21:58:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=889#comment-1890</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;Last month, Macromedia introduced the FLASH Search Engine SDK....&lt;/em&gt;

A quick web search will confirm that this has actually been available for a few years now.

One of the things that the company &lt;em&gt;does&lt;/em&gt; need to do is to find a way to interact better with those selling search-engine placement advice. I hope to see progress on this over the next few months.

Regards,
John Dowdell
Macromedia Support</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Last month, Macromedia introduced the FLASH Search Engine SDK&#8230;.</em></p>
<p>A quick web search will confirm that this has actually been available for a few years now.</p>
<p>One of the things that the company <em>does</em> need to do is to find a way to interact better with those selling search-engine placement advice. I hope to see progress on this over the next few months.</p>
<p>Regards,<br />
John Dowdell<br />
Macromedia Support</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SorrowMan - Dark Sad Poems</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/search-engines-can-read-macromedia-flash-sdk/889/comment-page-1/#comment-1879</link>
		<dc:creator>SorrowMan - Dark Sad Poems</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Sep 2004 17:53:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=889#comment-1879</guid>
		<description>Flash do not make websites more &quot;interesting&quot; most cases. It can make them more annoying when some designers insist there are sounds and whatnots. 

Putting sound on page is one most annoying possibilities because generally it seems to be turned on, and oh the joy when you are listening already something and webpage sounds start - what a sweet cacophony it is.

Google has shown already couple of months results from certain flash movies in search results, but nice to see they are going even further.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Flash do not make websites more &#8220;interesting&#8221; most cases. It can make them more annoying when some designers insist there are sounds and whatnots. </p>
<p>Putting sound on page is one most annoying possibilities because generally it seems to be turned on, and oh the joy when you are listening already something and webpage sounds start &#8211; what a sweet cacophony it is.</p>
<p>Google has shown already couple of months results from certain flash movies in search results, but nice to see they are going even further.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
