<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Search Engine News Review &#8211; Fri May 11,&#160;2007</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.searchenginejournal.com/search-engine-news-review-fri-may-11-2007/4904/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/search-engine-news-review-fri-may-11-2007/4904/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 17:43:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: CarstenCumbrowski</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/search-engine-news-review-fri-may-11-2007/4904/comment-page-1/#comment-463029</link>
		<dc:creator>CarstenCumbrowski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 May 2007 07:36:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/search-engine-news-review-fri-may-11-2007/4904/#comment-463029</guid>
		<description>The GMail filters are learning filters. With a few exceptions is it doing actually a pretty good job. It does filter out a lot of tricky spam, but I was frustrated after flagging a newsletter from the same source as NOT SPAM multiple times and it continued to mark it as spam instead of white listing it. 

The Spam increased for sure and more spam slipped through, but Gmail is learning again and better with filtering it out every day. That&#039;s my observation.


You point already to Danny&#039;s post about the Google tag-line. I left a comment there already. There is nothing left for me to say regarding this subject hehe.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The GMail filters are learning filters. With a few exceptions is it doing actually a pretty good job. It does filter out a lot of tricky spam, but I was frustrated after flagging a newsletter from the same source as NOT SPAM multiple times and it continued to mark it as spam instead of white listing it. </p>
<p>The Spam increased for sure and more spam slipped through, but Gmail is learning again and better with filtering it out every day. That&#8217;s my observation.</p>
<p>You point already to Danny&#8217;s post about the Google tag-line. I left a comment there already. There is nothing left for me to say regarding this subject hehe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

