<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Search Engine Journal Not Indexed in Microsoft&#8217;s Live&#160;Search</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.searchenginejournal.com/search-engine-journal-not-indexed-in-microsofts-live-search/4321/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/search-engine-journal-not-indexed-in-microsofts-live-search/4321/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 22:19:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/search-engine-journal-not-indexed-in-microsofts-live-search/4321/comment-page-1/#comment-478929</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2007 10:32:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=4321#comment-478929</guid>
		<description>I am also having this problem with our website:
http://www.footballtransferleague.co.uk
The site is obviously NOT spam, I have no idea why it is blocked. I have contacted Microsoft at webspam@microsoft.com for re-inclusion but heard nothing from them in over a month. Our site is still not indexed! Has anyone else used this route successfully? If so how long does it take?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am also having this problem with our website:<br />
<a href="http://www.footballtransferleague.co.uk" rel="nofollow">http://www.footballtransferleague.co.uk</a><br />
The site is obviously NOT spam, I have no idea why it is blocked. I have contacted Microsoft at <a href="mailto:webspam@microsoft.com">webspam@microsoft.com</a> for re-inclusion but heard nothing from them in over a month. Our site is still not indexed! Has anyone else used this route successfully? If so how long does it take?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: VPS</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/search-engine-journal-not-indexed-in-microsofts-live-search/4321/comment-page-1/#comment-386424</link>
		<dc:creator>VPS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Feb 2007 16:00:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=4321#comment-386424</guid>
		<description>Hey Carsten, can&#039;t you mind your language. I think MSN made people crazy about the bugs he created in the search.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Carsten, can&#8217;t you mind your language. I think MSN made people crazy about the bugs he created in the search.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CarstenCumbrowski</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/search-engine-journal-not-indexed-in-microsofts-live-search/4321/comment-page-1/#comment-376691</link>
		<dc:creator>CarstenCumbrowski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Jan 2007 08:15:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=4321#comment-376691</guid>
		<description>Sam: you are a hopeless optimist :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sam: you are a hopeless optimist :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/search-engine-journal-not-indexed-in-microsofts-live-search/4321/comment-page-1/#comment-375541</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jan 2007 10:22:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=4321#comment-375541</guid>
		<description>At last they have found a bug. I hope they will not repeat the same things in future.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At last they have found a bug. I hope they will not repeat the same things in future.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CarstenCumbrowski</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/search-engine-journal-not-indexed-in-microsofts-live-search/4321/comment-page-1/#comment-375307</link>
		<dc:creator>CarstenCumbrowski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jan 2007 06:36:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=4321#comment-375307</guid>
		<description>Search Engines are making more and more errors and get false positives regarding what is spam and what is not. 

I had a legit blog at blogger flagged as spam for reasons still not disclosed last year. 

Yeah, blogger got some heat and probably decided to risk flagging a lot of legit blogs just to get some of the more sophisticated spam out of their index. 

This thought worries me a lot. This goes also hand in hand with the increased fear by webmasters to do something wrong and lose in the search engine game because of that. 

I am not talking about manipulations with the intend to trick search engines, but normal website development and content creation. It is easier nowadays to see your site disappear from the search results without doing anything bad.

This trend continues with how you write the content itself if you use contextual advertising to monetize your site. The wrong word in the text and before you know it turn the income generating Ads to unpaid PSA messages.

The Search Engines did a good job that webmasters have them more and more in mind when designing a website rather than the user. 

Much more than they did and had to in the past.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Search Engines are making more and more errors and get false positives regarding what is spam and what is not. </p>
<p>I had a legit blog at blogger flagged as spam for reasons still not disclosed last year. </p>
<p>Yeah, blogger got some heat and probably decided to risk flagging a lot of legit blogs just to get some of the more sophisticated spam out of their index. </p>
<p>This thought worries me a lot. This goes also hand in hand with the increased fear by webmasters to do something wrong and lose in the search engine game because of that. </p>
<p>I am not talking about manipulations with the intend to trick search engines, but normal website development and content creation. It is easier nowadays to see your site disappear from the search results without doing anything bad.</p>
<p>This trend continues with how you write the content itself if you use contextual advertising to monetize your site. The wrong word in the text and before you know it turn the income generating Ads to unpaid PSA messages.</p>
<p>The Search Engines did a good job that webmasters have them more and more in mind when designing a website rather than the user. </p>
<p>Much more than they did and had to in the past.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Li Evans</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/search-engine-journal-not-indexed-in-microsofts-live-search/4321/comment-page-1/#comment-374893</link>
		<dc:creator>Li Evans</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jan 2007 00:03:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=4321#comment-374893</guid>
		<description>Wow Loren!  SEJ is spam... *shakes head*  .... no wonder why Live/MSN Search can&#039;t get things right.  Legitimate sites labeled spam.... and spam is mostly what comes up in their results..... yeesh!

Sure hope whatever they did clears up this little snafu!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow Loren!  SEJ is spam&#8230; *shakes head*  &#8230;. no wonder why Live/MSN Search can&#8217;t get things right.  Legitimate sites labeled spam&#8230;. and spam is mostly what comes up in their results&#8230;.. yeesh!</p>
<p>Sure hope whatever they did clears up this little snafu!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sushubh</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/search-engine-journal-not-indexed-in-microsofts-live-search/4321/comment-page-1/#comment-374719</link>
		<dc:creator>Sushubh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jan 2007 21:35:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=4321#comment-374719</guid>
		<description>umm. it&#039;s weird. if they block a site from indexing considering it to be webspam... then how come they still show the related incoming links to the blocked domain!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>umm. it&#8217;s weird. if they block a site from indexing considering it to be webspam&#8230; then how come they still show the related incoming links to the blocked domain!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Loren Baker, Editor</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/search-engine-journal-not-indexed-in-microsofts-live-search/4321/comment-page-1/#comment-374703</link>
		<dc:creator>Loren Baker, Editor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jan 2007 21:26:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=4321#comment-374703</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;I just received this from Microsoft Live Search:&lt;/b&gt;

Hi there,

Thanks for pointing this out -- we appreciate it. Turns out that your site was identified as spam by our software, when it clearly shouldn&#039;t have been. This has been fixed, and your site should be picked up in our next crawl.

Reading the comments I realize there are others that might be wondering why their site isn&#039;t in our index -- and there&#039;s no one universal answer.
 
If they suspect they&#039;ve been blacklisted inappropriately they can e-mail
webspam@microsoft.com for re-inclusion.

Thanks again for the heads-up,

Aaswath
Program Manager, Live Search</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>I just received this from Microsoft Live Search:</b></p>
<p>Hi there,</p>
<p>Thanks for pointing this out &#8212; we appreciate it. Turns out that your site was identified as spam by our software, when it clearly shouldn&#8217;t have been. This has been fixed, and your site should be picked up in our next crawl.</p>
<p>Reading the comments I realize there are others that might be wondering why their site isn&#8217;t in our index &#8212; and there&#8217;s no one universal answer.</p>
<p>If they suspect they&#8217;ve been blacklisted inappropriately they can e-mail<br />
<a href="mailto:webspam@microsoft.com">webspam@microsoft.com</a> for re-inclusion.</p>
<p>Thanks again for the heads-up,</p>
<p>Aaswath<br />
Program Manager, Live Search</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sushubh</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/search-engine-journal-not-indexed-in-microsofts-live-search/4321/comment-page-1/#comment-374610</link>
		<dc:creator>Sushubh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jan 2007 20:04:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=4321#comment-374610</guid>
		<description>yup. i had like to know the reason too. so that i can fix up my site to get indexed by Live Search.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yup. i had like to know the reason too. so that i can fix up my site to get indexed by Live Search.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Loren Baker, Editor</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/search-engine-journal-not-indexed-in-microsofts-live-search/4321/comment-page-1/#comment-374597</link>
		<dc:creator>Loren Baker, Editor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jan 2007 19:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=4321#comment-374597</guid>
		<description>Eytan,

Thank you. Could you please update me and our readers as to when the problem is fixed and what the issue is.

Thanks, Loren</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Eytan,</p>
<p>Thank you. Could you please update me and our readers as to when the problem is fixed and what the issue is.</p>
<p>Thanks, Loren</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

