<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rumor: Microsoft to Acquire Semantic Search Engine&#160;Powerset</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.searchenginejournal.com/rumor-microsoft-to-acquire-semantic-search-engine-powerset/7220/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/rumor-microsoft-to-acquire-semantic-search-engine-powerset/7220/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 22:19:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Bo</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/rumor-microsoft-to-acquire-semantic-search-engine-powerset/7220/comment-page-1/#comment-1081799</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Bo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 09:42:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/rumor-microsoft-to-acquire-semantic-search-engine-powerset/7220/#comment-1081799</guid>
		<description>Its important that search applications emphasize the myriad subtleties in information classification to cater to different user characteristics. When these differences power search engines, we’ll get closer to perfect representation. Take a look at http://www.topodia.com = interesting approach</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Its important that search applications emphasize the myriad subtleties in information classification to cater to different user characteristics. When these differences power search engines, we’ll get closer to perfect representation. Take a look at <a href="http://www.topodia.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.topodia.com</a> = interesting approach</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Luiz</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/rumor-microsoft-to-acquire-semantic-search-engine-powerset/7220/comment-page-1/#comment-1081754</link>
		<dc:creator>Luiz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jun 2008 21:25:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/rumor-microsoft-to-acquire-semantic-search-engine-powerset/7220/#comment-1081754</guid>
		<description>I know Powerset possibilities and I really believe that MS has much to gain if this transaction in fact occurs. 

Relevancy, this is the graal of search engines. As much MS will be able to offer more useful results, it might naturally bring users, and that&#039;s why I partially disagree with the comment above.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know Powerset possibilities and I really believe that MS has much to gain if this transaction in fact occurs. </p>
<p>Relevancy, this is the graal of search engines. As much MS will be able to offer more useful results, it might naturally bring users, and that&#8217;s why I partially disagree with the comment above.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick Stamoulis</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/rumor-microsoft-to-acquire-semantic-search-engine-powerset/7220/comment-page-1/#comment-1081750</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Stamoulis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jun 2008 12:52:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/rumor-microsoft-to-acquire-semantic-search-engine-powerset/7220/#comment-1081750</guid>
		<description>It would not surprise me if Microsoft did acquire Powerset, but I think MS should focus less on technology and more on bringing over users.  Why does the mass market use Google and Yahoo! only to search?  Technology yes, but it goes much deeper than that, comfort level, brand, etc...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It would not surprise me if Microsoft did acquire Powerset, but I think MS should focus less on technology and more on bringing over users.  Why does the mass market use Google and Yahoo! only to search?  Technology yes, but it goes much deeper than that, comfort level, brand, etc&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

