<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Putting An End To Supplemental Hell Because Of Site Moves, Site Restructure Or Big Site&#160;Launch</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.searchenginejournal.com/putting-an-end-to-supplemental-hell-because-of-site-moves-site-restructure-or-big-site-launch/4436/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/putting-an-end-to-supplemental-hell-because-of-site-moves-site-restructure-or-big-site-launch/4436/</link>
	<description>Latest Search Engine News from the Search Engine Journal</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 07:45:52 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: CarstenCumbrowski</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/putting-an-end-to-supplemental-hell-because-of-site-moves-site-restructure-or-big-site-launch/4436/comment-page-1/#comment-406400</link>
		<dc:creator>CarstenCumbrowski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2007 18:08:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=4436#comment-406400</guid>
		<description>Regarding launches of complete new sites with a lot of pages. You can take care of the issue today already. 
 
Tell people to upload a full site map to Google on the day of the launch or at least the option to specify how much pages the site contains (estimate). 
 
Webmasters that go through the registration process are no black hats. 
 
People would also not mind to provide business contact and emergency technical contact information if that is being used for good things that benefits them, such as providing advanced warning about major site changes, additions and launches. 
 
Google can then in return also contact a webmaster, if they see problems. Some of it can be automated (e.g. notifications about crawl issues), others by a human (questions regarding the hardware capabilities of the new launched site for example). 
 
You don&#039;t want to kill the new site, but the owner also does not want that you nag just the homepage for several weeks without even to attempt a deep crawl).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Regarding launches of complete new sites with a lot of pages. You can take care of the issue today already. </p>
<p>Tell people to upload a full site map to Google on the day of the launch or at least the option to specify how much pages the site contains (estimate). </p>
<p>Webmasters that go through the registration process are no black hats. </p>
<p>People would also not mind to provide business contact and emergency technical contact information if that is being used for good things that benefits them, such as providing advanced warning about major site changes, additions and launches. </p>
<p>Google can then in return also contact a webmaster, if they see problems. Some of it can be automated (e.g. notifications about crawl issues), others by a human (questions regarding the hardware capabilities of the new launched site for example). </p>
<p>You don&#8217;t want to kill the new site, but the owner also does not want that you nag just the homepage for several weeks without even to attempt a deep crawl).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Keegan</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/putting-an-end-to-supplemental-hell-because-of-site-moves-site-restructure-or-big-site-launch/4436/comment-page-1/#comment-400200</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Keegan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Feb 2007 00:02:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=4436#comment-400200</guid>
		<description>I have a site that I have wanted to move from one domain to another one but I am terrified of the penalties that would occur if I made the move. If Google were to accept your suggestions, then I&#039;d move. Otherwise I am staying put.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a site that I have wanted to move from one domain to another one but I am terrified of the penalties that would occur if I made the move. If Google were to accept your suggestions, then I&#8217;d move. Otherwise I am staying put.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
