<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How to Predict Traffic from&#160;Google</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.searchenginejournal.com/predict-traffic-google/16168/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/predict-traffic-google/16168/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 09:28:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: executive coaching</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/predict-traffic-google/16168/comment-page-1/#comment-1247669</link>
		<dc:creator>executive coaching</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Apr 2010 07:37:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=16168#comment-1247669</guid>
		<description>This is a very good article with many good tips, thank you for that - now I am wiser in this subject.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a very good article with many good tips, thank you for that &#8211; now I am wiser in this subject.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mikemarketing1</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/predict-traffic-google/16168/comment-page-1/#comment-1244539</link>
		<dc:creator>mikemarketing1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Apr 2010 22:57:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=16168#comment-1244539</guid>
		<description>This is a very interesting post and a problem that all SEO people have struggled with. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I&#039;ve personally used several tools to try to get an understanding of this.  One that I find tto have a lot of value is market samurai.  It&#039;s slick, fast and intuitive.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I was looking closely at the numbers from your screenshot example and the numbers didn&#039;t add up for me.  I could very possible be missing something.  Here is an example of what I mean.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Day 1 had about 5% of the traffic for that month, which results in about 125K searches.  At position 7, you stated that you received 250 hits, which calculated to around 20%.  A couple things with this:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;1. 20% of 125K is 25K&lt;br&gt;2. 20% of all traffic for position #7 seems way too high.  Everything i&#039;ve read and experienced has shown postion #7 to be around 2-3%.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Could the percentage be two decimal points off or am I missing something incredibly obvious?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Mike</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a very interesting post and a problem that all SEO people have struggled with. </p>
<p>I&#39;ve personally used several tools to try to get an understanding of this.  One that I find tto have a lot of value is market samurai.  It&#39;s slick, fast and intuitive.  </p>
<p>I was looking closely at the numbers from your screenshot example and the numbers didn&#39;t add up for me.  I could very possible be missing something.  Here is an example of what I mean.</p>
<p>Day 1 had about 5% of the traffic for that month, which results in about 125K searches.  At position 7, you stated that you received 250 hits, which calculated to around 20%.  A couple things with this:</p>
<p>1. 20% of 125K is 25K<br />2. 20% of all traffic for position #7 seems way too high.  Everything i&#39;ve read and experienced has shown postion #7 to be around 2-3%.</p>
<p>Could the percentage be two decimal points off or am I missing something incredibly obvious?</p>
<p>Thanks,</p>
<p>Mike</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: coach bags outlet</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/predict-traffic-google/16168/comment-page-1/#comment-1239577</link>
		<dc:creator>coach bags outlet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Apr 2010 06:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=16168#comment-1239577</guid>
		<description>The &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.discount-coach.com/&quot; title=&quot;coach purses for sale&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;coach purses for sale&lt;/a&gt; really inspired all sorts of strong opinions. I love floral prints but I’m not sure what to think of the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.discount-coach.com/&quot; title=&quot;coach outlet purses&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;coach outlet purses&lt;/a&gt; sotres…the gold handles are distracting me. On the right person with the right kind of personality and outfit, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.discount-coach.com/&quot; title=&quot;Discount Coach Handbags&lt;br&gt;&quot;&gt;Discount Coach Handbags&lt;/a&gt; could be cute.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The <a href="http://www.discount-coach.com/" title="coach purses for sale" rel="nofollow">coach purses for sale</a> really inspired all sorts of strong opinions. I love floral prints but I’m not sure what to think of the <a href="http://www.discount-coach.com/" title="coach outlet purses" rel="nofollow">coach outlet purses</a> sotres…the gold handles are distracting me. On the right person with the right kind of personality and outfit, &lt;a href=&#8221;http://www.discount-coach.com/&#8221; title=&#8221;Discount Coach Handbags<br />&#8220;&gt;Discount Coach Handbags could be cute.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arrow SEO</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/predict-traffic-google/16168/comment-page-1/#comment-1188527</link>
		<dc:creator>Arrow SEO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 23:19:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=16168#comment-1188527</guid>
		<description>Wow. This is great. Thanks Shane.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow. This is great. Thanks Shane.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sascha</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/predict-traffic-google/16168/comment-page-1/#comment-1177841</link>
		<dc:creator>Sascha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 08:26:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=16168#comment-1177841</guid>
		<description>Perfect timing. Was just sitting over an excel sheet (well actually it&#039;s numbers) myself. Great input. Thx a lot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perfect timing. Was just sitting over an excel sheet (well actually it&#8217;s numbers) myself. Great input. Thx a lot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Claire Jarrett</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/predict-traffic-google/16168/comment-page-1/#comment-1177198</link>
		<dc:creator>Claire Jarrett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 18:38:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=16168#comment-1177198</guid>
		<description>Wow, a real use for a Pivot Table :-) I will have a go, thanks for this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, a real use for a Pivot Table :-) I will have a go, thanks for this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shane</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/predict-traffic-google/16168/comment-page-1/#comment-1177073</link>
		<dc:creator>Shane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 08:43:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=16168#comment-1177073</guid>
		<description>@Michael - Good point will give that a try

@Onerab - it was correct within around +/- 2% on some of the live data that I used to test it with.

@Alex - I think i must have been having a blind day when I missed the link on that. Thanks :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Michael &#8211; Good point will give that a try</p>
<p>@Onerab &#8211; it was correct within around +/- 2% on some of the live data that I used to test it with.</p>
<p>@Alex &#8211; I think i must have been having a blind day when I missed the link on that. Thanks :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/predict-traffic-google/16168/comment-page-1/#comment-1176883</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 00:32:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=16168#comment-1176883</guid>
		<description>Nice article. Well put together.

Have been doing this for some time - with some additional steps (naturally).

PS. Yes you *can* download Google Insights -&gt; top right hand corner &quot;Download as CSV&quot;.

peace. alex</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice article. Well put together.</p>
<p>Have been doing this for some time &#8211; with some additional steps (naturally).</p>
<p>PS. Yes you *can* download Google Insights -&gt; top right hand corner &#8220;Download as CSV&#8221;.</p>
<p>peace. alex</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Onerab</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/predict-traffic-google/16168/comment-page-1/#comment-1176689</link>
		<dc:creator>Onerab</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 15:49:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=16168#comment-1176689</guid>
		<description>Very interesting article. Have you tried to verify the estimated traffic with the actual traffic and if so, how close are they?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very interesting article. Have you tried to verify the estimated traffic with the actual traffic and if so, how close are they?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Thomson</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginejournal.com/predict-traffic-google/16168/comment-page-1/#comment-1176688</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Thomson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 15:47:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=16168#comment-1176688</guid>
		<description>Nice article Shane. Used a very similar technique myself.

Once thing, you may wish to consider changing &quot;Match Type&quot; to &quot;Exact&quot; in GAKT - I always find &quot;Broad&quot; artificially inflates the numbers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice article Shane. Used a very similar technique myself.</p>
<p>Once thing, you may wish to consider changing &#8220;Match Type&#8221; to &#8220;Exact&#8221; in GAKT &#8211; I always find &#8220;Broad&#8221; artificially inflates the numbers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

